At Least Four Pages Not Including The Title Page Or Bibliogr

At Least Four Pages Notincluding The Title Page Or Bibliography Page

Write at least four pages (not including the title page or bibliography page) on a topic from the list below. Students may select any one of these topics and use either citation style they prefer. The paper should be well-researched, analytical, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the issue.

Topics to choose from:

  1. Discuss the impacts of illegal immigration upon the United States and evaluate the contrasting reform proposals offered by liberals and conservatives. Must a country have enforceable borders or does this no longer matter?
  2. Define anthropogenic climate change. Are the cost/benefits of government action to reduce CO2 worthwhile or could our efforts be better directed towards reducing disease and poverty in the world? What are the contrasting responses to climate change by the alarmists and those who disagree?
  3. Political bias in the "mainstream" media—how extensive is it and what is "fake news?" Has President Trump been the recipient of almost non-stop criticism from most of the media for his entire term in office? Why is this?
  4. Evaluate the Trump administration's response to the COVID-19 pandemic from positive to negative. Why have the state responses been mostly different between Democratic and Republican governors? Has the pandemic been used as a political weapon?
  5. Discuss current racial unrest and discord in the United States. Is defunding or reducing police expenditures an appropriate response? Should groups like BLM and Antifa be held responsible for violence? What is the role of political leaders who support or remain silent about these groups?
  6. Discuss the upcoming presidential election and explain the major policy ideas in each party's platform. What are the major differences between Democrats and Republicans? Who is most likely to win?
  7. What are the problems with critical race theory and the assumption that most white people are inherently racist while other races are not?
  8. Define "social justice" and how progress is measured in achieving it. Is "equality under the law" the most important precept of American democracy? Why or why not?
  9. Is economic equality more important than political equality? Is Bernie Sanders' socialism the answer to capitalism's problems or does socialism lead to tyranny?
  10. What have been the results of applied socialism in China and Russia regarding individual liberty? What does Hong Kong’s current situation reveal about the Chinese Communist Party?

Write a comprehensive, well-structured academic paper of at least four pages that thoroughly explores your selected topic, including background, analysis, and conclusion supported by credible evidence and scholarly sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The topic selected for this paper is "Define anthropogenic climate change. Are the cost/benefits of government action to reduce CO2 worthwhile or could our efforts be better directed towards reducing disease and poverty in the world? What are the contrasting responses to climate change by the alarmists and those who disagree?" This essay aims to explore the scientific basis of anthropogenic climate change, analyze the economic and social implications of governmental interventions, and compare the perspectives of climate change alarmists and skeptics.

Introduction

Climate change has emerged as one of the most pressing global challenges in the 21st century. The term "anthropogenic climate change" refers to the alteration of Earth's climate attributable primarily to human activities, especially the emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2). This phenomenon has significant implications for environmental stability, public health, and economic development. Understanding whether governmental efforts to curb CO2 emissions are justified requires examining scientific evidence, economic costs and benefits, and alternative priorities such as addressing poverty and disease.

Scientific Basis of Anthropogenic Climate Change

Extensive scientific research supports the conclusion that human activities have contributed substantially to recent climate shifts. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that "it is extremely likely" that human influence has been the dominant cause of observed global warming since the mid-20th century (IPCC, 2021). The combustion of fossil fuels increases atmospheric CO2 levels, trapping heat and leading to phenomena such as rising sea levels, melting ice caps, and more frequent extreme weather events (Hansen et al., 2018). Skeptics often question the extent of human influence or interpret climate variability as part of natural cycles; however, the preponderance of scientific evidence confirms the anthropogenic origin of recent changes.

Economic and Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Government Actions

Government interventions, such as implementing carbon taxes, renewable energy mandates, and international agreements like the Paris Accord, aim to reduce emissions and mitigate impacts. Supporters argue that the costs of inaction—rising disaster-related expenses, health impacts, and environmental degradation—outweigh the costs of mitigation (Stern, 2007). Conversely, critics contend that such policies can impose significant economic burdens, potentially harming growth and employment, especially in developing nations that depend on fossil fuels for their development (Nordhaus, 2018). There is also concern that aggressive climate policies may divert resources from urgent issues like disease eradication and poverty alleviation, which arguably could save more lives in the short term.

Contrasting Perspectives: Alarmists vs. Skeptics

Alarmists emphasize that immediate action is vital to prevent catastrophic irreversible impacts, urging rapid decarbonization and transformation of energy systems (Cook et al., 2016). They warn that delays could lead to environmental collapse and severe socioeconomic consequences. Skeptics, however, argue that climate models tend to overstate risks, and that the economic costs of rapid transition could be prohibitively high, adversely affecting vulnerable populations in developing countries (Lomborg, 2018). Some skeptics advocate for adaptation strategies and targeted aid, rather than disruptive and costly regulatory interventions.

Conclusion

Addressing anthropogenic climate change involves complex trade-offs between environmental sustainability and economic development. While scientific consensus affirms human influence on climate, debates persist over the most effective and equitable policy responses. Redirecting focus toward reducing global disease burden and poverty remains vital, but ignoring the environmental crisis would threaten long-term human survival. Balanced, multi-faceted approaches that incorporate scientific evidence, economic considerations, and social priorities are essential for sustainable progress.

References

  • Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., et al. (2016). Quantifying the consensus on human-caused global warming: A review of the literature. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 043002.
  • Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., et al. (2018). Global temperature change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(34), 8660–8668.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report.
  • Lomborg, B. (2018). How to spend $72 billion to make the world better. The New York Times.
  • Nordhaus, W. (2018). Why the urgency of climate change isn't a recipe for economic disaster. Harvard Business Review.
  • Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press.

Related Assignments