Att00001 Txt Att00002 Txt Att00003 Txt Att00004 Txt Att00005

Att00001txtatt00002txtatt00003txtatt00004txtatt00005txtatt00006t

Att00001txtatt00002txtatt00003txtatt00004txtatt00005txtatt00006t

Att00001txtatt00002txtatt00003txtatt00004txtatt00005txtatt00006t

ATT00001.txt ATT00002.txt ATT00003.txt ATT00004.txt ATT00005.txt ATT00006.txt ATT00007.txt ATT00008.txt ATT00009.txt ATT00010.txt ATT00011.txt ATT00012.txt ATT00013.txt Sent from my iPhone IMG_3706.jpg IMG_3707.jpg IMG_3708.jpg IMG_3709.jpg IMG_3710.jpg IMG_3711.jpg IMG_3712.jpg IMG_3713.jpg IMG_3714.jpg IMG_3715.jpg IMG_3716.jpg IMG_3717.jpg IMG_3718.jpg · The intent of the assignment is to demonstrate critical reflective thought and apply knowledge gained from the readings to professional growth and development. · After reading assigned chapter, complete a 500-word write-up. Indicate the number of words (word count) at the bottom left corner of the submission. If you are unfamiliar with the word count feature of MS Word, contact The Writing Center, The Center for Online Learning, or search online for information about this feature. · For the assignment, critically reflect upon the material in the chapter.

Demonstrate your understanding of chapter content; how the information applies to professional growth/development; and how it can be used in professional practice. As you construct your paragraphs, ask yourself – What specific key points stand out in this chapter? What did I learn that I will critically apply to professional practice and professional development? What professional insights have I gained from this chapter? · Please note: While personal experiences and examples can be useful in other contexts, your write-ups are to focus on professional and career-related examples and applications rather than personal examples and applications. A 500-word write-up is short and focused.

Make every sentence count with substantive thought. · Focus on writing in a professional tone and refrain from a “conversational†or “casual†tone in your writing. Errors in grammar, word use, and writing structure will not be accepted. · Refer to the Assessment of Written Work rubric for criteria used to evaluate the write-ups. · Remember to include the word count at the bottom left corner of the post. For this discussion, carefully read sources 77 through 79 in Chapter 12 of Voices of Freedom (starting on page 240). In these documents, you can see differing views about women's role in society held by Catherine Beecher, Sarah Grimke, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Although they all argued for changes in women's place in society, Cady Stanton and Grimke were considered radical while Beecher's ideas were more widely accepted.

Why do you think this was the case? In your response you should use evidence from the primary sources to prove your point. Typically this requires a three-step process of making your assertions about the issue, giving the reader evidence that proves your point (usually by providing a brief quotation from the text), and then fully explaining to the reader why the evidence proves your point. When you do provide information from the reader, be sure to provide citation. A simple parenthetical with the editor's name and the page number (Foner, 30) will suffice since we are all reading the same few sources each week.

Responses should run between 200 and 400 words. For full credit, be sure to provide a substantive response of at least 100 words to someone else's post after you have posted your response. A grading rubric for these discussions is available in the content section of this Blackboard site.

Paper For Above instruction

The primary aim of this assignment is to foster critical reflective thinking by analyzing how the readings inform professional growth and practice. After studying the designated chapter, students are required to compose a 500-word reflective essay that demonstrates comprehension of the chapter’s key points, their relevance to professional development, and their application in real-world professional settings. The reflection should focus explicitly on the material's implications for professional practice, emphasizing specific insights gained from the readings and how these can influence future professional actions. Personal anecdotes should be avoided, with an emphasis on examples related to career and professional contexts. The writing must be concise, avoiding redundancies, and maintain a formal, scholarly tone. Grammar, vocabulary, and structure errors will lead to deductions per the rubric. Students should include the word count at the bottom left of their submission. Additionally, for the discussion component, students are instructed to analyze sources 77 through 79 in Chapter 12 of 'Voices of Freedom,' which depict contrasting views on women's societal roles by Catherine Beecher, Sarah Grimke, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. The goal is to explore why Stanton and Grimke were considered radical compared to Beecher, supported by evidence from the primary sources, with proper citations. Responses to peers should be between 100 and 400 words, providing substantive analysis and agreement or disagreement.

Paper For Above instruction

The essay begins with an introduction to the historical context of women's roles in society as depicted by the three influential figures: Catherine Beecher, Sarah Grimke, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. While all three advocated for some degree of change in women's societal positions, their approaches and acceptance levels varied significantly, reflecting differing societal norms and perceptions of women's capabilities. Catherine Beecher's views were largely aligned with prevailing societal expectations; she believed in promoting moral and educational development within the traditional domestic role, emphasizing women's roles as educators and moral guardians (Foner, 240). Her perspectives found wider acceptance as they reinforced existing gender norms, which positioned women primarily as nurturers and moral instructors. Conversely, Sarah Grimke and Elizabeth Cady Stanton argued for broader societal reforms and gender equality, challenging conventional norms. Grimke, a former Southern slaveholder turned abolitionist and women's rights advocate, emphasized the importance of women participating actively in social reforms, equality, and higher education (Foner, 241). Stanton, a prominent suffragist, campaigned vigorously for women's voting rights, legal equality, and participation in public life (Foner, 242). Their radical stances were perceived as threatening to the social order because they questioned the very foundation of traditional gender roles and societal hierarchies. Evidence from the primary sources underscores this divergence: Stanton's assertion that women needed legal enfranchisement to attain true equality starkly contrasted with Beecher's more conservative stance, which prioritized moral uplift within the domestic sphere. For example, Stanton argued, “The disqualification of women from voting perpetuates their dependence and inequality” (Foner, 242). This primary source evidence reveals why Stanton and Grimke were seen as radical—they directly challenged the established social and political norms. Additionally, societal acceptance of these contrasting views was influenced by their perceived threat level: Beecher's ideas aligned with societal interests, thus gaining broader acceptance, whereas Stanton and Grimke's proposals threatened the patriarchal power structure. Consequently, their perceived radicalism was rooted in their challenge to the status quo, which was bound to provoke resistance from traditional societal factions. In conclusion, the difference in acceptance levels between Beecher and the other two women stemmed from the degree to which their ideas challenged existing societal norms. Primary sources clearly demonstrate that Stanton and Grimke's advocacy for women's political rights and social participation positioned them as revolutionary figures, whereas Beecher's focus on moral and educational uplift within traditional roles rendered her views more socially palatable. Understanding these dynamics helps explain the varying societal reactions to early women's rights advocates and underscores the importance of perspective in social reform movements.

References

• Foner, Eric. Voices of Freedom: A Documentary History. 3rd ed., W.W. Norton & Company, 2014.