Attention Please Do Not Place A Bid If You Are Not Satisfied

Attention Pleasedo Notplace A Bid If You Are Not Satisfied With Pr

Describe a performance evaluation system that promotes behaviors and outcomes aligned with organizational strategic objectives, considering the Two Sides of Performance Management (page 164, Figure 6.1). Discuss how individual and team performance assessments would be conducted, recommending appropriate tools such as MBO or 360-degree feedback, and justify your choices using scholarly sources. Additionally, examine how HRM practices and systems add value to a firm, considering the concept of Marginal Utility Analysis. Support your discussion with at least one scholarly source, addressing the argument for or against the proposition that HRM adds value to organizations.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective performance management is essential for aligning employee behaviors, roles, and work outcomes with an organization’s strategic objectives. As depicted in Figure 6.1 on page 164 of Hunt’s Common Sense Talent Management, performance management encompasses two critical sides: maintaining performance and developing performance. A comprehensive system must integrate these elements to foster continuous improvement, strategic alignment, and organizational agility.

A high-performing evaluation system that aligns with strategic goals would emphasize clarity in expectations, accountability, and ongoing feedback. It would integrate multiple performance criteria, including individual competencies, team collaboration, innovation, and customer satisfaction. To support this, organizations should adopt a performance appraisal process that combines quantitative metrics with qualitative assessments, ensuring fairness and comprehensiveness.

Performance assessments could be conducted through various tools, depending on the context and objectives. Management by Objectives (MBO) is a popular choice for aligning individual goals with organizational strategy because it emphasizes measurable outcomes and accountability. MBO involves setting specific, achievable objectives collaboratively, then reviewing progress periodically. Its strength lies in its focus on results, which directly supports strategic priorities.

Alternatively, 360-degree feedback offers a more holistic view by collecting performance opinions from supervisors, peers, subordinates, and even customers. This method enhances self-awareness and identifies areas for development, especially in leadership roles. Its comprehensive nature makes it suitable for developmental purposes but may be resource-intensive. A combination of MBO for goal-oriented assessment and 360-degree feedback for developmental insights can provide a balanced evaluation framework.

In practice, tools such as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS), and digital performance management systems can enhance accuracy and objectivity. Implementing regular feedback sessions, performance coaching, and continuous performance dialogues ensures alignment and agility, which are critical in a competitive environment.

The second part of the discussion revolves around the value of HRM practices and systems. Marginal Utility Analysis suggests that the value of HRM practices can be assessed by the incremental benefit they provide relative to their cost. By integrating strategic HR practices—such as talent acquisition, training, performance management, and employee engagement—firms can create a competitive advantage. These practices directly impact productivity, innovation, and employee retention, thereby adding value to the firm.

Supporters argue that strategic HRM enhances organizational performance by fostering a motivated, skilled, and aligned workforce, which leads to superior financial results and market positioning. For example, Schuler and Jackson (2007) emphasize that HRM practices contribute to organizational capabilities and sustainable competitive advantage. Conversely, critics might contend that HRM's value is often overstated without clear causal evidence linking HR practices to performance outcomes.

In conclusion, a performance management system aligned with organizational strategy incorporates comprehensive assessment tools like MBO and 360-degree feedback, which promote both results and developmental growth. HRM practices, supported by Marginal Utility Analysis, can add significant value to a firm by fostering strategic alignment, productivity, and innovation. Organizations that systematically integrate these practices are more likely to sustain competitive advantage over the long term.

References

• Hunt, S. T. (2014). Common sense talent management: Using strategic human resources to improve company performance. Ebook Central.
• Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S. E. (2007). Strategic human resource management. Manual of Human Resource Management, 23(1), 55-73.
• Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page.
• DeNisi, A., & Smith, D. (2014). Performance appraisal, performance management, and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 33, 41-68.
• Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and Human Resource Management. Palgrave.
• Bernardin, H. J., & Buckley, M. R. (2018). Performance appraisal: Assessing human potential and individual performance. Addison-Wesley.
• Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for global competence: Are we there yet? Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 282-297.
• Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2019). The HR value proposition: Why smart HR practices matter. Harvard Business Review.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.