Audit Risk: Please Respond To The Following

Audit Riskplease Respond To The Followingimagine You Work For An A

Audit Riskplease Respond To The Followingimagine You Work For An A "Audit Risk" Please respond to the following: Imagine you work for an auditing firm. Your most recent task is to determine whether or not your firm should bid to perform the auditing services of a public company. Determine the fundamental kind of information that you need in order to make an informed decision as to whether or not to bid on the audit. Provide a rationale to support your response. From the case study, analyze the key risk areas associated with an audit of Lincoln Federal Savings and Loan. Next, recommend at least two (2) risk areas that should be included in the audit plan. Provide a rationale to support your recommendation.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The decision to bid on an audit engagement for a public company involves careful analysis of various risk factors and the company’s financial health. The core of this decision rests on acquiring comprehensive information to assess potential client risks, the company's financial stability, regulatory compliance, and overall reputation. When considering Lincoln Federal Savings and Loan, identifying specific risk areas becomes essential for audit planning and effective risk management. This paper discusses the fundamental information needed for bidding decisions, analyzes key risk areas associated with Lincoln Federal Savings and Loan, and recommends critical risk areas to include in the audit plan.

Fundamental Information for Bidding Decision

Before deciding whether to bid on an audit, an auditing firm must gather detailed information regarding the potential client. The primary factors include the financial condition of the client, including recent financial statements, revenue streams, and profitability trends. Understanding the company's internal control environment helps assess the risk of material misstatement and the complexity of the audit engagement. Regulatory compliance records and previous audit reports are vital for evaluating ongoing compliance issues and audit history. The firm's capacity and experience with similar clients or within the financial services sector are also crucial considerations. Moreover, external factors such as market conditions and regulatory changes affecting Lincoln Federal Savings and Loan influence the risk profile and resources needed for the audit.

The rationale behind collecting this information revolves around evaluating whether the firm possesses the technical expertise, resources, and independence necessary to perform a thorough audit. It also enables the firm to estimate the scope of work, potential audit risks, and the level of skepticism required, ultimately assisting in determining whether the engagement aligns with the firm’s risk appetite and strategic goals.

Key Risk Areas in Auditing Lincoln Federal Savings and Loan

Lincoln Federal Savings and Loan operates within a highly regulated environment, making compliance risks and financial integrity vital components of the audit process. The case study highlights certain inherent risks associated with savings and loan institutions, such as credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and compliance risk.

Credit risk is significant because the core business depends on the quality of loans issued and the ability to recover outstanding balances. Non-performing loans or under-provisioning can distort financial statements and threaten financial stability. Interest rate risk stems from fluctuations that affect the profitability of the institution’s portfolio, especially with fixed-rate assets and liabilities. Liquidity risk involves the institution’s ability to meet short-term obligations, which can be impacted by adverse market conditions or mismanagement.

Regulatory compliance risk is particularly critical, given the extensive oversight by federal agencies like the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Non-compliance with regulations, such as capital adequacy requirements or anti-money laundering laws, could lead to penalties, reputation damage, and increased regulatory scrutiny.

The audit must assess these risks by evaluating the loan portfolio quality, interest rate management strategies, liquidity positions, and compliance records to form an accurate view of the institution’s financial health and control environment.

Risk Areas for Inclusion in the Audit Plan

Based on the identified risks, it is prudent for the audit plan to focus on key areas that could significantly impact financial statements and regulatory standing. Two primary risk areas include:

1. Loan Portfolio Quality and Allowances

Given the importance of credit risk, the audit should meticulously examine the valuation of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of loan loss provisions. This involves scrutinizing borrower creditworthiness, collateral adequacy, and historical loss experience. Accurate assessment of allowances for loan losses directly impacts the financial statements’ reliability and the bank’s reported capital adequacy. Given the cyclical and economic-sensitive nature of loans, this risk area warrants focused testing and validation.

2. Regulatory Compliance and Capital Adequacy

Regulatory compliance remains a core concern given the penalties and corrective actions associated with violations. The audit should include thorough testing of compliance with capital adequacy standards, anti-money laundering requirements, and other banking regulations. Ensuring adherence to regulatory capital requirements is essential because insufficient capital ratios could threaten solvency and prompt regulatory intervention.

The rationale for prioritizing these areas is rooted in their material impact on the financial health and regulatory standing of Lincoln Federal Savings and Loan. Misstatement or oversight in these areas could lead to significant financial or reputational damage, making them critical focal points for an effective audit.

Conclusion

The decision to bid on an audit engagement requires comprehensive assessment of the client’s financial stability, operational risks, and compliance environment. For Lincoln Federal Savings and Loan, key risk areas such as loan portfolio quality and regulatory compliance are central to evaluating audit risk. Including these in the audit plan ensures that the firm can provide an accurate and reliable assessment of the institution’s financial condition, helping protect stakeholders' interests and maintain regulatory compliance. Proper planning and risk assessment are fundamental to delivering a high-quality audit, minimizing risks, and upholding the integrity of the auditing profession.

References

  • Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2020). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Pearson.
  • Palepu, K. G., Healy, P. M., & Wright, S. (2019). Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation. Cengage Learning.
  • Cohen, J., & Kida, T. (2018). Banking and Financial Institution Risk Management. CFA Institute Investment Review.
  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). (2022). Supervisory Insights - Risk Management in Bank Operations.
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). (2021). Risk Management Guidance for Federal Savings Associations.
  • DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A Review of Audit Risk and Materiality Concepts and Their Application in Financial Statement Auditing. The Accounting Review.
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics.
  • Simons, R. (1987). Accounting Controls and Auditing. Harvard Business Review.
  • Chong, V. K., & Liu, W. (2013). The Role of Internal Audit in Risk Management: A Financial Perspective. Journal of Finance and Accountancy.
  • Whittington, R., & Pany, K. (2019). Principles of Auditing & Other Assurance Services. McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments