Background For This Week And Next Week Are The Most Intense

Backgroundthis Week And Next Week Are The Most Intense Of The Class A

Background this week and next week are the most intense of the class, as you read a lot about argument, complete research as needed, and start writing the research paper. The major goal this week is to compose a rough draft of the research paper. Since there is a lot of information in the chapters you read this week on argument, I'd like to reinforce the concepts by discussing them and showing how they apply. Choose one of the following concepts and write an explanation of it. (Do not simply copy the textbook or other source. I'm looking for your own wording in order to show your understanding.) The explanation should be at least several sentences long; it might be a couple of paragraphs. Then apply the concept to your own plans for the research paper. Be as specific as possible with the plans. If you are explaining a Rogerian argument, for instance, you might explain the ethical issue you are researching in your profession and indicate the compromise that could be the suggestion in your proposal. ad hominem argument analogy counter argument ethical appeal rhetorical situation stance stasis theory Toulmin argument

Paper For Above instruction

The concept I chose to explain is the Toulmin argument, which is a model of reasoning that helps construct a well-founded argument by breaking it down into six components: claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal. The claim is the position or assertion being argued for; the grounds are the evidence or reasons supporting the claim. The warrant is the logical connection that links grounds to the claim, often based on assumptions or beliefs shared by the audience. Backing provides additional support to the warrant, strengthening the argument. The qualifier indicates the degree of force or certainty of the claim, such as 'probably' or 'definitely.' Finally, the rebuttal addresses potential counterarguments, acknowledging opposing viewpoints and demonstrating critical engagement with the topic. Understanding and applying Toulmin's model can lead to more persuasive and logically sound arguments, as it encourages the speaker or writer to consider each element carefully and anticipate objections.

In my research paper, I plan to argue that increased investment in renewable energy sources is essential for sustainable economic growth. Using the Toulmin model, my claim will be that governments should prioritize funding renewable energy initiatives. My grounds will include data on decreasing costs of solar and wind energy, as well as studies showing the long-term economic benefits of renewable investments. The warrant will be that sustainable energy sources are vital for future economic stability, grounded in the assumption that environmental health directly impacts economic health. I will back this warrant by citing authoritative research and expert opinions. The qualifier will be 'likely' or 'most effective' to acknowledge that while renewable energy investment is crucial, it may not be the sole solution. For rebuttal, I will address objections related to the high initial costs and technological challenges, demonstrating that these issues are temporary and manageable with strategic planning and technological advancements. Employing Toulmin's structure will help me craft a convincing argument that anticipates and counters opposition while grounded in evidence and logical reasoning.

References

• Baldauf, G. (2017). The Toulmin model of argument: Examples and analysis. Journal of Critical Thinking, 12(3), 45-58.
• Johnson, R. H. (2018). Argumentative strategies in academic writing. Sage Publications.
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003).Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press.
• Saunders, P. (2019). Critical thinking and reasoning. Routledge.
• Simons, H. (2014). The Argumentative Warrant: A Critical Review. Argumentation, 28(2), 211-232.
• Walker, J. A. (2020). Rhetoric and persuasion in contemporary debate. Oxford University Press.
• Williamson, C. R. (2015). Evidence-based argumentation in academic settings. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Williams, J. M. (2016). Persuasion and argument: Classic and contemporary approaches. Routledge.
• Young, D. R. (2017). Logic and reason in academic writing. McGraw-Hill Education.