Background Of International Projects Presented By Multinatio

Backgroundinternational Projects Present Multinational Corporations Wi

International projects present multinational corporations with complexities in organizing profitable transaction structures. Challenges include foreign exchange risk, credit risk, payment terms, and the certainty of realization. Additionally, negotiations with foreign entities, governments, agents, and intermediaries add layers of difficulty. An exemplary scenario illustrating the demanding environment for global financial activities is the case of “Avicular Controls and Pakistan Airlines,” found in Cases in International Finance on page 40.

This assignment requires reviewing the case carefully and addressing the following questions:

1. Consider the conflicting responsibilities within Avicular Controls’ organizational structure—between strategic management and the functional areas of marketing and finance. Explain how these responsibilities meshed to improve outcomes and how they diverged, causing problems that impeded financial management.

Paper For Above instruction

International projects are accompanied by an inherent complexity rooted in organizational, financial, and geopolitical factors. Multinational corporations (MNCs) like Avicular Controls (ACI) operate in an environment where strategic objectives often conflict with operational and financial priorities, especially when engaging in international deals requiring detailed coordination across various units and stakeholders. The case of ACI and its dealings with Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) exemplifies both the opportunities and challenges faced by MNCs in managing international transactions amid cross-cultural, legal, and financial uncertainties.

ACI, with roots dating back to 1903, had grown into a significant global enterprise by 1996, with a diverse portfolio including industrial process controls and avionics systems. Its expansion into international markets necessitated intricate organizational coordination, particularly between strategic management, which set organizational goals and policies, and functional departments such as marketing and finance, which execute on tactical levels. The conflicting responsibilities between these units often led to strategic misalignments and operational inefficiencies, especially in sensitive areas like currency risk management and profit margin preservation.

Strategic management within ACI was responsible for broad policy decisions, including entering new markets and setting long-term growth trajectories. Meanwhile, the marketing and finance functions were tasked with executing these strategies within operational constraints, such as local currency dealings, risk management, and sales profitability. The case highlights instances where these units experienced conflicting priorities; for example, while corporate treasury aimed to hedge currency risk and maintain margin integrity, local divisions often prioritized sales volume, which sometimes entailed accepting unfavorable currency terms or margin erosion.

This misalignment created problems for financial management, as the treasury's risk mitigation efforts (such as charging transfer fees or imposing currency hedging conditions) could frustrate local sales efforts, undermining revenue generation. Gabriel’s concern regarding the perils to return on sales underscores the tension between strategic financial policies designed to minimize risk and the operational realities of closing international deals. This discord hampers the company's profitability and operational agility, especially in emerging markets like Pakistan, where local currency management is more complex.

The organizational structure, depicted in the case, shows a dual hierarchy where strategic directives from corporate are sometimes at odds with local operational needs. For example, treasury's policy of passing currency risk to business units might limit flexible negotiations in foreign territories but aims to protect corporate profit centers. Conversely, local units and sales teams, focused on capturing market share, might bypass certain risk management protocols to close deals quickly, risking exposure to foreign exchange loss.

Furthermore, communication gaps between these functions exacerbate misalignments, leading to delayed decision-making and inconsistent policy implementation. As Gabriel’s remark indicates, the need for upper-level approval and detailed negotiations reflects the tension between strategic oversight and operational autonomy. When corporate management and functional units fail to synchronize their goals and policies effectively, financial inefficiencies and strategic misfires result.

To mitigate these issues, integrated organizational frameworks and clear communication channels are essential. Strategies such as decentralizing certain decision-making authority, aligning incentive structures, and establishing unified risk management policies can enhance coherence between strategic and operational levels. For instance, empowering local managers with risk mitigation tools tailored to market conditions can improve responsiveness while maintaining overall corporate risk controls.

In conclusion, the case of ACI illuminates how the meshing and divergence of responsibilities among strategic management, marketing, and finance departments can significantly influence the success of international projects. Proper alignment and communication are crucial to balancing risk and reward in complex global environments. Multinational corporations must foster organizational structures that support both strategic oversight and operational flexibility, ensuring profitable proceedings while managing the inherent risks of international commerce.

References

• Cho, M., & Ramanathan, S. (2007). International Business Strategies and Operations. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 563–578.
• Ellis, P., & Johnson, D. (2016). Managing Financial Risks in Multinational Corporations. Financial Management Journal, 42(2), 223-245.
• Hill, C. W. L. (2014). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Jensen, M. C. (2001). Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice. Financial Analysts Journal, 57(4), 35-45.
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What Firms Do: Coordination, Identity, and Learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.
• Peng, M. W. (2016). Global Strategy (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A Perspective on Regional and Global Strategies of Multinational Enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3–18.
• Shapiro, A. C. (2006). Multinational Financial Management (8th ed.). Wiley.
• Young, S. D., & Tavares, A. (2010). International Risk Management in Multinational Corporations. Business & Economic Review, 2(1), 45–60.
• Yip, G. S. (2003). Total Global Strategy: Managing for Worldwide Competitive Advantage. Prentice Hall.