Background Support With References To Research Done

Background Support with references to research you have done about this situation – don’t just base it on the newspaper article

Provide a comprehensive discussion that supports the background of the situation by including research-based evidence. Avoid relying solely on the newspaper article; incorporate scholarly articles, credible reports, and other authoritative sources that elucidate the context, causes, and implications of the situation. This will establish a well-founded foundation for your proposal.

Paper For Above instruction

The importance of grounding background information in credible research rather than solely relying on media reports is paramount in academic and professional settings. Newspaper articles, while useful for initial understanding and contextual overviews, often lack the depth, empirical data, and comprehensive analysis necessary to inform effective proposals and strategies. Therefore, integrating scholarly research enhances the credibility and robustness of the background information, leading to more informed decision-making.

Research indicates that issues similar to the described situation are often multifaceted, involving economic, social, environmental, and political dimensions. For example, studies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) suggest that firms that proactively address societal concerns tend to experience better stakeholder relationships and long-term sustainability (Porter & Kramer, 2006). Similarly, in environmental management contexts, scientific literature underlines the importance of evidence-based practices to effectively tackle pressing ecological challenges (Kemp, 2017).

In the realm of social issue interventions, empirical research emphasizes the significance of understanding root causes through data analysis and stakeholder engagement. According to Bryson (2018), effective strategies for societal problems necessitate comprehensive stakeholder analysis, which ensures that diverse perspectives are considered, and interventions are tailored to meet the needs of different groups. Such an approach increases the likelihood of successful implementation and sustainable impact.

Further supporting evidence from research on organizational change indicates that involving stakeholders early in the process improves buy-in and reduces resistance (Kotter, 2012). This aligns with the use of tools such as Mendelow’s Matrix, which helps identify and prioritize key stakeholders based on their power and interest levels. As evidenced in various case studies, stakeholder analysis informed by empirical research can lead to more strategic engagement and resource allocation (Mitchell, Agle & Wood, 1997).

In conclusion, effective background research relies on integrating findings from scholarly literature, which offers a nuanced understanding of the situation, guides strategic decision-making, and increases the project's chances for success. Relying solely on media reports could result in a superficial understanding, whereas research-based evidence provides a comprehensive foundation for developing sustainable and impactful solutions.

References

• Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
• Kemp, D. (2017). Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Ecosystem Services, 23, 133–142.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.