Balanced Scorecard For Rasha Graham Posted N

Balanced Scorecard1orasha Graham Posted N

A new approach to strategic management was developed in the early 1990's by Drs. Robert Kaplan Harvard Business School and David Norton. They named this system the balanced scorecard. It points out some of the weaknesses and vagueness of previous management approaches; the balanced scorecard approach provides a precise prescription as to what companies should measure to balance the financial perspective. The balanced scorecard is a management system not only a measurement system that enables organizations to clarify their vision and strategy and translate them into action. It provides feedback around both the internal business processes and external outcomes to continuously improve strategic performance and results.

When fully deployed, the balanced scorecard transforms strategic planning from an academic exercise into the nerve center of an enterprise. The Balanced scorecard retains traditional financial measures. But financial measures tell the story of past events, an adequate account for industrial age companies for which investments in long-term capabilities and customer relationships were not critical for success. These financial measures are inadequate, however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age companies must make to create future value through investment in customers, suppliers, employees, processes, technology, and innovation. The balanced scorecard methodology builds on some fundamental concepts of previous management ideas such as Total Quality Management, including customer-defined quality, continuous improvement, employee empowerment, and primarily measurement-based management and feedback.

It calculates the major cost factors that go into performing each responsibility and reports the total cost and the percentage of your revenue that you spend on each obligation. This application allows owners and managers to assess how effective they are using their people, space, and financial resources for the activities necessary for their clinics. This expense analysis helps the owners better manage their entire practice, more confidently decide if they have to make operational changes, and more accurately determine whether they should keep activities in-house or outsource them. Identify and discuss the types of information that would be included in a balanced scorecard that would not be readily apparent on your financial statements.

Non-financial goals, Strengths, weakness, opportunities, and threats, How could you use the information from the balanced scorecard to improve operations and increase your division's profitability? Provide at least three specific examples. By using the Balanced Scorecard, I can identify the factors that are hurting my business and outline a strategic change that will bring better results. By listing out my plans and how to make a future difference, giving me a better chance at redirecting my company toward success. By bringing in new customers, my product uses in the sense of am I using too much message oil, linens, towels, keep track of my customers such as return customers Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management part I. Accounting Horizons (March): 87-104.

Paper For Above instruction

The balanced scorecard (BSC) has profoundly transformed the landscape of strategic management since its inception in the early 1990s by Robert Kaplan and David Norton. Unlike traditional management approaches that primarily relied on financial metrics, the BSC integrates both financial and non-financial measures to provide a more comprehensive view of organizational performance. This integration facilitates strategic clarity, operational efficiency, and continuous improvement, making it an indispensable tool for modern enterprise management.

Understanding the Balanced Scorecard

The core principle behind the BSC is that financial outcomes alone are insufficient to gauge future success. Financial measures tend to reflect past performance and may overlook critical drivers of future value such as customer satisfaction, internal processes, learning, and innovation. Accordingly, the BSC categorizes performance indicators into four perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal Business Processes, and Learning & Growth. This multidimensional approach ensures organizations are aligned not only toward financial goals but also strategic initiatives that foster sustainability and growth.

Non-Financial Information in a Balanced Scorecard

One of the strengths of the BSC lies in its ability to incorporate non-financial data that are vital for long-term success but are not readily visible in financial statements. These include customer satisfaction scores, employee engagement levels, process efficiency metrics, innovation rates, and brand reputation indicators. For example, customer loyalty and satisfaction data can reveal insights into service quality and future revenue potential, while employee training and development metrics reflect organizational capacity for innovation and adaptability. Such non-financial metrics provide early warning signals and help managers proactively address issues that could impact financial outcomes later.

Utilizing the Balance Scorecard for Operational Improvement

The strategic insights derived from a well-implemented BSC enable managers to identify operational inefficiencies and areas for improvement. For instance, if customer satisfaction scores decline, management can initiate targeted training programs or process improvements. If internal process measures indicate bottlenecks, workflow re-engineering can be undertaken to enhance productivity. Additionally, tracking employee engagement can lead to initiatives aimed at fostering a culture of continuous learning and innovation, vital for staying competitive in dynamic markets.

Three specific ways organizations can leverage BSC data include:

1. Enhancing Customer Service: By monitoring customer feedback scores and response times, businesses can tailor their service delivery to increase customer retention and acquisition.
2. Optimizing Operational Efficiency: Internal process metrics, such as cycle time and defect rates, highlight inefficiencies that, when improved, lead to cost reductions and faster turnaround times.
3. Fostering Innovation and Learning: Employee development metrics identify skills gaps and training needs, promoting innovation and adaptable workforce development.

Strategic Decision-Making and Future Planning

The BSC serves as a bridge between strategic planning and operational execution. Instead of viewing strategic plans as static documents, organizations can utilize BSC to monitor real-time performance against strategic objectives. This dynamic feedback loop enables timely adjustments to initiatives, resource allocations, and organizational priorities, ultimately driving better business outcomes.

For example, if the BSC reveals that customer acquisition metrics are stagnant, a company might invest more in marketing campaigns or revamp its value proposition. Conversely, if internal processes are inefficient, reengineering efforts or technological investments can be prioritized. Consequently, the BSC is not just a measurement tool but a strategic management system that ensures alignment, accountability, and continuous improvement across all organizational levels.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the balanced scorecard revolutionizes traditional performance measurement by integrating financial and non-financial indicators that matter for sustainable success. Its ability to provide a balanced view of organizational health makes it a pivotal tool for strategic management. By leveraging insights from the BSC, organizations can foster a proactive, aligned, and resilient enterprise capable of thriving in competitive and ever-changing environments.

References

• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87-104.
• Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E., & Brewer, P. C. (2014). Managerial Accounting (15th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Wild, J., Shaw, K., & Chiappetta, B. (2002). Fundamental Accounting Principles. McGraw-Hill.
• Goektuerk, H. (2005). Activity-Based Costing (ABC) - advantages and disadvantages. GRIN Verlag.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review.
• Mercer, G. (2014). Strategic management accounting: An overview. Journal of Business Strategy.
• Ebben, M., & Johnson, A. (2012). Implementing the balanced scorecard: Challenges and strategies. Management Decision.
• Niven, P. R. (2006). Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Ensuring Strategic Success. Wiley.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business Review.
• Parmenter, D. (2015). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. Wiley.