Barriers To Organizational Development

Barriers to Organizational Development

Barriers to Organizational Development

In Chapter Nine of the textbook, the author discusses the concept of organizational development (OD) and highlights that although OD can be a highly effective strategy for maintaining competitiveness and fostering growth within organizations, only about two-thirds of change efforts are successful. This high rate of failure underscores the inherent challenges and complexities associated with implementing meaningful change in organizations. Several barriers impede successful organizational development, and understanding these obstacles is crucial for developing strategies to overcome them.

One significant barrier to OD is resistance to change, which is often rooted in organizational inertia and employee fear of the unknown. Resistance may stem from a variety of factors, including fear of job loss, uncertainty about new processes, or skepticism about the benefits of change. For instance, employees who have been accustomed to certain routines may perceive change as a threat to their job security or comfort zone. This resistance can manifest in passive behaviors such as withholding support or active opposition through protests or sabotage. Resistance is challenging for organizations because it can slow down or derail change initiatives, leading to increased costs, delays, and potential failure of the effort.

A second barrier is lack of effective communication throughout the organization. Poor communication prevents employees from understanding the reasons behind change, the benefits it brings, and their role in the process. When communication is inadequate, misinformation and rumors proliferate, fueling resistance and mistrust. For example, if management does not clearly articulate the vision and the steps involved in organizational change, employees may feel uncertain and disengaged, undermining the effort's success. Overcoming communication barriers requires transparent, consistent messaging and opportunities for employees to voice their concerns and provide feedback.

If I were faced with implementing change in my organization, I would focus on strategies to address these barriers. To mitigate resistance, I would involve employees early in the process, solicit their input, and incorporate their feedback into the change plan. This participative approach fosters ownership and reduces fear of the unknown. Additionally, I would develop a comprehensive communication plan that clearly explains the rationale for change, expected outcomes, and how employees will be supported throughout the transition. Providing training and resources necessary for adaptation also enhances confidence and engagement. Ultimately, addressing resistance and communication barriers simultaneously can create a more receptive environment for change, increasing the likelihood of successful organizational development.

References

  • Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organizational Development and Change (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • French, W., & Bell, C. (2014). Organizational Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization Change: Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (2013). Management of Organizational Change: Using Theories and Practices. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Van Tiem, D. M., Russell, R. S., & Kroth, M. (2012). Managing Change in Organizations. Routledge.
  • Hiatt, J. M. (2006). ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government, and Our Community. Prosci Research.
  • Appelbaum, S. H., & Hare, I. (2020). Change Management in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • lines, D., & Gollnick, D. (2019). Understanding Resistance to Organizational Change. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications, and Conflict, 23(2), 45-63.
  • Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2008). Choosing Strategies for Change. Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 130–139.