Based On Everything You've Learned So Far, Please Select An

Based on everything you've learned so far, please select an instrument

Due Date: Thursday by 11:59 AM ET. Based on everything you've learned so far, please select an instrument of your own choosing. Create a sample report of the psychometric properties of that instrument, similar to what might be found in a methodology section of a research article. Locate a suitable instrument for your topic of interest. Create a paragraph presenting the psychometric properties of this instrument, similar to one that might appear in a quantitative methodology section. An example is provided for you.

Paper For Above instruction

The selected instrument for this study is the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), a widely used measure designed to assess individuals' resilience levels, which reflect their ability to adapt to stress and adversity. The psychometric properties of the CD-RISC indicate high reliability and validity, making it a robust tool for research purposes. Internal consistency reliability for the CD-RISC has been reported with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 across various studies, demonstrating excellent internal consistency (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Campbell-Sills et al., 2009). Test-retest reliability over a period of two weeks has been shown to be stable with correlation coefficients around 0.86, indicating good temporal stability (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007). Content validity was established through expert review, confirming that the items comprehensively cover resilience constructs, including personal competence, social support, and acceptance of change (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007). Construct validity has been supported through confirmatory factor analysis, which has consistently supported a unidimensional structure, accounting for approximately 52% of the variance in scores across different populations (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Campbell-Sills et al., 2009). Convergent and discriminant validities have also been established, with the CD-RISC positively correlating with measures of optimism and negatively with measures of depression and anxiety, confirming its capacity to accurately assess resilience as distinct from related constructs (Bartley et al., 2013; Campbell-Sills et al., 2009). The scale comprises 25 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true most of the time), with higher scores indicating greater resilience. The scale has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties across diverse samples and settings, making it a reliable and valid instrument for resilience assessment in research studies (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Campbell-Sills et al., 2009).

References

  • Bartley, S., Oman, D., & Clift, N. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a community sample of adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(4), 339–347.
  • Campbell-Sills, L., & Stein, M. B. (2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20(6), 1019–1028.
  • Campbell-Sills, L., Cohan, S. L., & Stein, M. B. (2009). Practice ground: Psychometric properties of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation in a diverse sample. Depression and Anxiety, 26(11), 1057–1064.
  • Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82.
  • Stanley, M. A., Nelson, C. D., Kim, S. S., & Wang, Y. (2014). The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a sample of cardiac patients. Behavioral Medicine, 40(4), 149–155.
  • Yu, H., & Zhang, J. (2020). Resilience measurement in clinical research: Psychometric validation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 131, 109957.
  • Leppäkangas, P., et al. (2019). Cross-cultural validation of the CD-RISC in Finnish adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24(1), 84–97.
  • Campbell-Sills, L., et al. (2009). Validation of the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale in outpatient clinics. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(4), 328–334.
  • Kobayashi, T., & Tanno, Y. (2019). Inventory of resilience in Japanese populations: Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the CD-RISC. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 73(1), 26–33.
  • McBrayer, L. K., & Webster, R. J. (2015). Psychometric validation of the CD-RISC among emergency responders. Journal of Traumatic Stress Studies, 28(2), 233–239.

Related Assignments