Based On The Information Regarding The New Emergency Technol

Based On The Information Regarding the New Emergency Technology Do Yo

Based on the information regarding the new emergency technology, do you still have the same opinion regarding the proposed system's resilience. Why? Do you believe such a system had value in the pre-event or preparedness phase? Write about 300 words.

The evolution of emergency management systems over recent years has significantly enhanced their resilience and operational capacity, especially for pre-event preparedness and early warning scenarios. Initially, systems like the one proposed by Zibuschka, Laufs, and RoàŸnagel (2011) focused predominantly on response operations, emphasizing real-time data collection during emergencies. However, advancements in technology, particularly in sensor robustness, communication infrastructure, and redundancy, have addressed previous concerns about system resilience and have underscored the importance of these systems during the pre-event phase.

Modern systems like the DART II tsunami detection system exemplify remarkable resilience through multiple redundancies such as satellite communication, buoy networks, and pressure sensors. These technological enhancements improve system durability against natural disasters; for instance, staff sensors and communication channels are designed to withstand harsh marine and atmospheric conditions, thus ensuring continuous data transmission even amidst extreme events. Such resilience is crucial for pre-event phases, allowing authorities to monitor threat levels proactively, issue timely warnings, and mobilize resources to mitigate damage.

Furthermore, the integration of ubiquitous components—sensors, monitoring devices, and communication systems—has augmented the capability of emergency systems to operate reliably during the critical pre-event period. The value in the preparedness phase is undeniable, as early detection and accurate information dissemination enhance community readiness, enable evacuations, and facilitate resource planning. With the technological advancements since 2011, the core principles of resilience and ubiquitous integration have been considerably strengthened, reaffirming the vital role these systems play in early warning and pre-event preparedness.

Paper For Above instruction

Emergency management systems have traditionally undergone significant evolution from response-centric models to proactive preparedness frameworks. The technological advancements made since the early 2010s have fundamentally enhanced their resilience, especially in the pre-event phase, by ensuring continuous operation, robustness against environmental challenges, and the capacity for early warning dissemination.

The initial proposal by Zibuschka, Laufs, and RoàŸnagel (2011) highlighted the potential of ubiquitous components such as sensors and secure communication channels meant to support all phases of the emergency lifecycle. However, the system’s main limitations lay in its focus on response, with less emphasis on infrastructure resilience or pre-event preparedness. Advances in sensor technology, communication infrastructure, and redundancy have directly addressed these limitations, allowing modern systems to operate effectively in challenging environments while providing reliable early warnings.

The DART II tsunami detection system exemplifies these technological advancements. It employs a network of pressure sensors, satellite communications, and redundant buoy systems to detect tsunamis early. The resiliency of this system is underpinned by multiple layers of redundancy—such as the use of Iridium satellite technology, pressure sensors designed to withstand the ocean’s harsh conditions, and the deployment of multiple buoys across different locations—ensuring continuous operation even during extreme weather or seismic events (Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology, 2016; FEMA, 2012). This multi-layered approach minimizes the risk of system failure, a crucial aspect in the pre-event phase where early detection can save lives.

Similarly, hurricane detection and warning systems leverage technology with robust infrastructure components that function reliably to predict storm paths and intensities. These systems, designed with redundancy and resilience at their core, allow authorities to forecast events days in advance, providing valuable lead time for evacuation and resource deployment (FEMA, 2012). The integration of such resilient systems marks a significant improvement over earlier designs that often failed during extreme conditions, highlighting the importance of durability in emergency technology.

Furthermore, the value of such systems in the pre-event phase extends beyond detection. They enable authorities and communities to undertake informed decision-making, develop contingency strategies, and conduct drills based on real-time data. For instance, the early warning capabilities of tsunami sensors like DART II facilitate timely evacuations, reducing loss of life and property damage (Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology, 2016). Similarly, hurricane warning systems empower coastal communities to activate emergency plans well before the storm makes landfall (FEMA, 2012).

In conclusion, technological innovation over the past decade has significantly enhanced the resilience of emergency management systems, making them more reliable and effective during the pre-event phase. These systems' ability to withstand environmental challenges, facilitate early detection, and support decision-making underscores their invaluable role in comprehensive emergency preparedness. As technology continues to evolve, further resilience improvements are anticipated, fostering safer communities better prepared for natural disasters.

References

• Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. (2016). Deep ocean tsunami detection buoys. Retrieved from https://www.bom.gov.au/tsunami/detection/
• FEMA. (2012). Federal emergency management: A brief introduction. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/
• Jibuschka, J., Laufs, U., & RoàŸnagel, H. (2011). Towards ubiquitous emergency management systems. Proceedings of Modiquitous 2011.
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2015). Tsunami warning and detection systems. NOAA Technical Reports.
• NRC. (2014). Emergency Communications: A Technical Perspective. National Research Council.
• Whitworth, J., et al. (2012). Advances in tsunami detection technology. Marine Technology Society Journal, 46(2), 56-67.
• Gonzalez, C., et al. (2015). Resilience in disaster management Systems. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(4), 345–356.
• Shah, M., & Kiran, R. (2018). Communication Infrastructure and Resilience in Emergency Management Systems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
• World Health Organization. (2016). Emergency preparedness and response. WHO Publications.
• Smith, A., & Taylor, B. (2019). Improving resilience in disaster detection and response systems. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 16(3), 1-20.