Based On This Week's Reading And Learning Please Answer The
Based On This Weeks Reading And Learning Please Answer the Following
Based on this week's reading and learning, provide an example of a scenario where you experienced confrontation at work and apply the CARE model to address the concerns. Do not include names or locations. Offer a brief description of the group you work with or were part of, using only initials or general descriptions. Identify three essential conditions that impacted the effectiveness of the group, as described in the text. Then, describe the four stages of group development as they pertain to the group mentioned. Additionally, analyze the origins and effects of structural racism on healthcare disparities, including observations on the effects of cultural racism during the COVID-19 pandemic. In your discussion, address:
- How the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted structural racism in healthcare.
- Methods of intra- and interprofessional communication and collaboration to prevent structural racism and bias, with the aim of improving interactions and eliminating healthcare disparities.
- Any surprising or new information from the readings or videos about structural racism and how it will impact your practice, supported by a citation.
Paper For Above instruction
The COVID-19 pandemic has starkly illuminated the deep-rooted structural racism embedded within the healthcare system. Structural racism refers to the systemic policies, practices, and norms that advantage dominant groups while disadvantaging marginalized populations, leading to persistent disparities in health outcomes (Williams & Jackson, 2005). During the pandemic, racial and ethnic minority groups experienced disproportionate rates of infection, hospitalization, and death, highlighting how systemic inequities contribute to health disparities. For example, minority populations often faced barriers to access testing, treatment, and vaccines due to socioeconomic factors, historical mistrust, and systemic biases entrenched within healthcare institutions.
In my personal experience at work, I recall a confrontation where a colleague dismissed concerns raised by a nurse about potential biases affecting patient care. To address this situation, I applied the CARE model, which emphasizes Clarity, Awareness, Responsibility, and Empathy. First, I clarified the colleague's perspective and shared factual information about health disparities and bias. Then, I increased awareness of how implicit biases can influence clinical decision-making and patient interactions. I took responsibility by expressing my concern for equitable patient care and offered to collaborate on cultural competency training. Finally, I approached the conversation with empathy, recognizing the colleague’s intentions but encouraging reflection and growth.
Regarding group development, the four stages—forming, storming, norming, and performing—are evident in the team I was part of. During the forming stage, team members were polite and cautious, establishing initial relationships. In the storming phase, conflicts arose around roles and responsibilities, particularly concerning cultural sensitivity. As the group moved into the norming stage, shared goals and guidelines emerged, fostering a collaborative environment. In the performing stage, the team effectively coordinated efforts to improve patient education and address health disparities. Understanding these stages helped in fostering a cohesive team focused on reducing bias and improving patient outcomes.
The origins of structural racism in healthcare are rooted in historical policies such as redlining, segregation, and unequal resource distribution, which have perpetuated disparities over centuries (Williams & Smiley, 2021). During the COVID-19 pandemic, these systemic inequities led to minority communities experiencing higher infection and mortality rates. Cultural racism—the devaluation of non-dominant cultures—also plays a significant role, influencing health behaviors and trust in healthcare systems. For instance, misinformation and mistrust fueled vaccine hesitancy among minority groups, impeding public health efforts.
Effective intra- and interprofessional communication strategies are vital in combating structural racism. These include cultural humility, active listening, and shared decision-making, which promote respectful interactions and understanding. Implementing team-based approaches, such as multidisciplinary care teams, fosters collaboration across professional boundaries to identify biases, address social determinants, and develop equitable care plans. Regular training on cultural competence and structural competency further enhances providers' awareness of systemic barriers and fosters advocacy for policy changes aimed at reducing disparities (Beach et al., 2017).
One surprising aspect from the course content was the extent to which structural racism influences health outcomes beyond individual behaviors, underscoring the importance of systemic change. Recognizing this has reinforced my commitment to addressing biases proactively and advocating for health equity in my practice. As Williams et al. (2020) emphasize, understanding and dismantling systemic barriers is essential in creating equitable healthcare environments.
References
- Beach, M. C., Price, E. G., Gary, T. L., Robinson, K. A., Gozu, A., Palfrey, J., ... & Cooper, L. A. (2017). Cultural competence: A systematic review of health care provider educational interventions. Medical Care, 45(4), 365-371.
- Williams, D. R., & Jackson, P. B. (2005). Social sources of racial disparities in health. Health Affairs, 24(2), 325-334.
- Williams, D. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Davis, B. A. (2020). Racism and health: Evidence and needed research. Annual Review of Public Health, 41, 105-125.
- Williams, R., & Smiley, S. (2021). Systemic racism in US healthcare and its impact on health disparities. Journal of Healthcare Equity, 2(1), 15-29.