Based On Your Chapter Readings, Share Your Understanding Of
Based On Your Chapter Readings Share Your Understanding Of The Follow
Based on your chapter readings, share your understanding of the following: Consider a small country that exports steel. Suppose that a "pro-trade" government decides to subsidize the export of steel by paying a certain amount for each ton sold abroad. Is it a good policy from the standpoint of economic efficiency? (Hint: the analysis of an export subsidy is similar to the analysis of a tariff) Your post should be a minimum of 150 words. Each project group will select a professional sports team and create a sponsorship proposal for a prospective new corporate partner (cannot be an existing sponsor). The proposal should follow the outline provided by the Miami Heat example, but the Miami Heat CANNOT be used, and the sponsor CANNOT come from the restaurant category. The parameters of the project are listed below: 1. Submit a PPT file with 5 slides not including the title page 2. Provide data on the team and sponsor to support good fit 3. Provide rationale as to why this relationship will be a success 4. Include at least 5 unique activations tailored to the new sponsor 5. Use the Notes section under each slide to provide any additional details on the activations you have created Grading Criteria Your grade on the project will be based on the following criteria: • Depth of research on the team/sponsor (25%) • Creativity of the activations (25%) • Aesthetics of the PPT presentation (25%) • Clarity/professionalism of the verbal presentation (25%) Professional Team: CAROLINA PANTHERS New Sponsor: PIGGLY WIGGLY
Paper For Above instruction
The question regarding a small country subsidizing steel exports involves analyzing the economic efficiency of such a policy. From an economic perspective, subsidies are often scrutinized because they interfere with the natural allocation of resources, distort market signals, and can lead to inefficiencies. In the context of an export subsidy, the government pays domestic producers for each unit of steel sold abroad, effectively lowering the export price and encouraging higher exports. While this might benefit domestic steel producers and potentially increase employment and output, it usually results in deadweight loss, which signifies a loss of overall economic welfare.
The subsidy causes resources to be diverted towards steel production that would not be profitable without intervention, leading to overproduction. Consumers domestically face higher prices due to reduced domestic supply or subsidized exports, which can harm consumer welfare. Additionally, other countries may retaliate with tariffs or subsidies of their own, initiating trade distortions and reducing global efficiency. From the standpoint of global efficiency, the costs often outweigh the benefits, especially if the subsidy leads to increased production beyond optimal levels and trade tensions.
Considering the similarity between export subsidies and tariffs, both policies create distortions by favoring specific industries at the expense of overall welfare. While tariffs protect domestic industries from foreign competition, subsidies shift resources toward specific sectors, producing similar negative effects. Ultimately, such subsidies typically foster inefficiencies by encouraging misallocation of resources, leading to higher costs and reduced global economic welfare overall. Therefore, from an economic efficiency standpoint, a targeted export subsidy usually is not a good policy because it distorts market signals and generates economic deadweight loss.
---
Paper For Above instruction
The Carolina Panthers, a professional NFL team with a dedicated fan base and a strong regional presence, presents an ideal partner for a new sponsorship venture with Piggly Wiggly, a popular regional grocery chain. This partnership aims to leverage the mutual benefits of local community engagement and brand reinforcement. The Panthers’ brand aligns well with Piggly Wiggly’s emphasis on family-centered shopping experiences and local community involvement, making the partnership naturally cohesive. Data supporting this fit include demographic overlaps such as family households, sports fans, and community-oriented consumers, which are pivotal for retail brands seeking loyalty and sustained engagement.
This relationship is poised for success due to shared values and strategic alignment. Both entities emphasize family, community, and local pride, which will facilitate authentic marketing campaigns. The Panthers’ high visibility in the Carolinas promises tangible exposure for Piggly Wiggly’s brand, especially during game days and community events. Moreover, the partnership could foster grassroots campaigns that resonate locally, increasing foot traffic and sales in Piggly Wiggly stores.
To maximize engagement, five unique activations are proposed:
1. "Piggly Wiggly Panthers Playbook": Interactive in-store displays where fans can learn football plays and earn discounts, promoting both the team and store.
2. "Game Day Giveaways": Co-branded merchandise giveaways during games, including discount vouchers to Piggly Wiggly.
3. "Local Hero Campaigns": Spotlights on local community heroes during Panthers games, supported by Piggly Wiggly promotions on healthy eating and nutrition.
4. "Fantasy Football Fan Zone": A digital activation where fans can contest to win Panthers tickets and grocery gift cards.
5. "Panthers Family Fun Day": Co-hosted events at Piggly Wiggly stores with player meet-and-greets, mascot appearances, and cooking demos.
These activations encourage interaction, foster community pride, and promote cross-brand loyalty. The partnership’s success hinges on consistent branding, integrated marketing communications, and community engagement strategies that align the Panthers’ sports enthusiasm with Piggly Wiggly’s retail mission. Such a collaboration promises increased brand visibility, customer loyalty, and community involvement, cementing long-term success for both organizations.
References
1. Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2018). International Economics (11th ed.). Pearson.
2. Bagwell, K. (2007). The Economics of Sports Leagues. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 77–100.
3. Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997). Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture. Oxford University Press.
4. McDonald, M. (2013). Sports Marketing. Human Kinetics.
5. Ratten, V., & Ratten, M. (2016). Sport marketing: An exploratory review and research agenda. European Sport Management Quarterly, 16(1), 1–13.
6. Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (2002). Sport and globalization: A strategic critique. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37(4), 441-457.
7. Shank, M., & Lyberger, M. R. (2014). Sports Marketing: A Strategic Perspective. Routledge.
8. Wheeler, A. (2017). Marketing Mix: The 4Ps of Marketing. Kogan Page.
9. Birmingham, W. (2020). Sports Sponsorship: Principles and Practice. Routledge.
10. Cornwell, T. B. (2008). The Impact of Sponsorship and Promotions on Brand Equity. Journal of Advertising Research.