Before A Crisis: The American Red Cross And The Salvation

Before A Crisisthe American Red Cross Along With The Salvation Army A

Before a crisis, the American Red Cross, along with the Salvation Army and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), are the leading national responders to many disasters in the United States and, depending on the scope, sometimes international. Many professional associations coordinate with these agencies, including the American Counseling Association and the National Board of Certified Counselors, along with other regional and state organizations. Local first responders, such as firefighters, police officers, and emergency medical technicians, also play essential roles in crisis response efforts. The importance of crisis planning cannot be overstated, as anticipating potential disasters facilitates effective communication and cooperation among involved agencies, forming a solid foundation for an efficient response.

Paper For Above instruction

Preparedness and response to crises necessitate a comprehensive understanding of the involved agencies, their roles, and how they collaborate. The American Red Cross, Salvation Army, and FEMA represent core organizations at the national level capable of mobilizing resources swiftly during emergencies. Analyzing these organizations' roles within specific states, such as Mississippi, reveals the importance of pre-established relationships and coordinated planning for effective disaster management.

The American Red Cross (ARC) has a pivotal role in disaster response, providing immediate relief services such as shelter, food, medical aid, and emotional support. Their expansive volunteer network and logistical capabilities enable rapid deployment in crisis zones, both domestically and internationally. The Salvation Army complements the ARC by offering humanitarian aid through a structured network of local corps offices, which provide food, shelter, and emotional care, often operating alongside government agencies. FEMA serves as the federal coordinating body, tasked with managing disaster response and recovery at the national level. It works closely with state and local agencies, offering resources, technical support, and establishing disaster policies.

In Mississippi, following Hurricane Katrina, numerous state and local agencies became actively involved in recovery efforts. These included the Mississippi Emergency Management Agency (MEMA), local fire departments, police units, and community organizations. For example, MEMA coordinated regional response efforts, mobilizing resources to affected counties, establishing shelters, and facilitating recovery services. Local fire and police departments provided rescue operations, security, and initial disaster assessment. Community-based organizations, including faith-based groups, collaborated with these agencies, exemplifying grassroots efforts to support residents. Such coordination illustrates the critical importance of pre-disaster planning and agency collaboration, which can significantly influence the effectiveness of response efforts.

The article “The Proof of the Planning is in the Platting” highlights planning issues concerning hurricane exposure mitigation, emphasizing that strategic planning significantly mitigates disaster impact. Planning involves identifying potential risks, establishing communication channels, and defining roles among agencies beforehand. For instance, Florida’s hurricane mitigation plan emphasizes stakeholder engagement, resource allocation, and continuous drills, all of which enhance readiness and response reliability.

Effective disaster planning also requires understanding the human element, as discussed in “Disaster Planning and Preparedness: A Human Story.” This source underscores that human cooperation, adaptability, and inter-agency communication are as crucial as logistical preparedness. As such, the roles of key organizations—such as FEMA, local emergency management agencies, and charitable organizations—must be well understood for seamless cooperation during crises.

Within my state, three prominent crisis-response organizations include:

The State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA)

SEMA is responsible for coordinating disaster response, resource allocation, and recovery efforts at the state level. It develops emergency plans, conducts training exercises, and liaises with federal agencies such as FEMA. SEMA facilitates inter-organizational coordination among local jurisdictions, ensuring a unified response during emergencies.

The Local Fire Department

The fire department provides rescue operations, fire suppression, and hazard mitigation within communities. During crises, fire services perform search and rescue missions, assist with evacuations, and support medical services. They often serve as first responders, providing frontline assistance and communication links with other agencies.

Nonprofit Humanitarian Organizations (e.g., Red Cross or Salvation Army)

These organizations offer specialized relief services, including shelter, food distribution, and emotional support. They work collaboratively with governmental agencies by setting up relief centers, providing volunteer support, and facilitating community engagement efforts.

The relationships among these organizations are predominantly collaborative and coordinated. SEMA provides overarching planning and resource management, guiding fire departments and nonprofit groups in their respective roles. During a disaster, the fire department might execute rescues while NGOs establish shelters, with SEMA coordinating resource distribution and ensuring communication flows smoothly. An example of inter-organizational cooperation is seen during hurricane responses, where SEMA directs local fire services to affected zones, while NGOs deploy relief teams to support displaced populations. The effectiveness of these relationships depends on prior joint planning, shared communication platforms, and mutual understanding of roles, which are crucial for optimizing disaster response and recovery.

Conclusion

In summary, understanding the specific roles of each crisis-response organization and fostering strong inter-organizational relationships enhance preparedness and response efforts. Pre-disaster planning, clear communication, and cooperative training exercises ensure that agencies can work synergistically during crises. Whether at the state or local level, the integration of government agencies and nonprofit organizations creates a resilient framework capable of effectively managing disaster impacts, ultimately saving lives and promoting recovery.

References

• Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2016). The Politics of Crisis Management. In The SAGE Handbook of Crisis Communication (pp. 37-50). Sage Publications.
• Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis Management in Hindsight: Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Control. Public Administration Review, 67(s1), 189-197.
• FEMA. (2020). Emergency Response and Recovery Framework. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
• Haddow, G. D., Bullock, J. A., & Coppola, D. P. (2021). Introduction to Emergency Management. Elsevier.
• Kapucu, N., & Van Wart, M. (2006). Public sector leadership and disaster response: An integrative framework. Administration & Society, 38(3), 279-308.
• Mitroff, I. I., & Anagnos, G. (2001). Managing Crises: Responses and Responsibilities. Business Horizons, 44(4), 39-48.
• Patel, N. V., Galea, S., & Pawar, V. (2017). Disaster Preparedness and Response Systems: A Review of Organizational and Human Factors. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 207-220.
• Russell, B. (2018). Planning for Disaster: Strategies for Effective Emergency Preparedness. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 15(4).
• Sadiq, R. et al. (2020). Interagency Coordination in Disaster Management: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Emergency Services, 9(1), 13-26.
• Wilkens, M. (2015). Crisis Management: Leading in the New Strategy Landscape. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), 68-75.