Begin By Describing The Three-Term Contingency And Explain W

Begin By Describing The Three Term Contingency And Explain Why It Is

Begin by describing the three-term contingency, and explain why it is described as the basic unit of analysis for operant behavior. In reviewing the contingencies of reinforcement and punishment, discuss how each set of contingencies has an effect on an individual's behavior. Choose a behavior from your own experience that has been reinforced, and identify whether that behavior was positively or negatively reinforced, outlining the specific three term contingency of that operant behavior. Next, choose a behavior from your own experience that has been punished and identify whether that behavior was positively or negatively punished; outline the specific three term contingency of that operant behavior. Finally, in either of those behaviors, discuss how matching law or schedules of reinforcement may contribute to the maintenance of the behavior under certain circumstances.

Paper For Above instruction

The three-term contingency is a fundamental concept in operant conditioning, representing the basic unit of analysis used to understand and modify behavior. It comprises three components: the antecedent stimulus (discriminative stimulus), the behavior (response), and the consequent (reinforcement or punishment). This model illustrates how environmental cues influence behavior and how the consequences that follow either strengthen or weaken that behavior. The three-term contingency is considered the basic unit of analysis because it encapsulates the interaction between stimuli, responses, and consequences, which collectively determine behavioral patterns. In operant behavior, reinforcement contingencies increase the probability of behavior occurring again, while punishment contingencies decrease that likelihood.

Reinforcement and punishment are essential processes that shape behavior through different contingencies. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a behavior reoccurring by introducing or removing stimuli after the response. Positive reinforcement involves presenting a pleasant stimulus to strengthen the behavior, such as giving praise after a student answers correctly. Negative reinforcement involves removing an unpleasant stimulus when the behavior occurs, like turning off a loud noise when a task is completed. Conversely, punishment aims to decrease behavior; positive punishment involves adding an unpleasant stimulus following a behavior, such as receiving a fine for speeding. Negative punishment involves removing a pleasant stimulus, such as losing privileges after misbehavior. Each contingency influences behavior by altering the likelihood that a specific response will occur in the future, shaping ongoing behavioral patterns within environmental contexts.

From personal experience, one reinforced behavior involved timely completion of work at my job, which was reinforced through positive reinforcement. The specific three-term contingency involved: (1) the discriminative stimulus was a supervisor’s praise or acknowledgment, (2) the behavior was submitting completed tasks on time, and (3) the reinforcement was praise or acknowledgment from the supervisor. This positive reinforcement increased the likelihood of maintaining punctual work habits, especially when praise was consistently provided for timely submissions.

Conversely, a punished behavior from my experience was arriving late to meetings, which was subject to negative punishment. The three-term contingency was: (1) the antecedent was the scheduled meeting time, (2) the behavior was arriving late, and (3) the consequence was the removal of social privileges such as participation in decision-making or informal team discussions, intended to discourage tardiness. This negative punishment reduced the frequency of late arrivals, as the exclusion from interactive discussions served as an aversive consequence.

Furthermore, the schedules of reinforcement and matching law play critical roles in maintaining behaviors. For instance, consistent schedules of reinforcement, such as fixed ratio or interval schedules, can sustain behaviors over time by providing predictable reinforcement. For example, reinforcing punctuality with praise after every timely submission (fixed ratio) can promote habitual behavior. Variable schedules, such as reinforcement after unpredictable instances, can produce more persistent behaviors even when reinforcement is intermittent, as seen with variable ratio schedules fostering persistent gambling behaviors.

The matching law suggests that individuals distribute their responses proportionally to the relative reinforcement obtained from available options. Applied here, if certain behaviors are reinforced more frequently or with higher value, individuals are more likely to allocate their efforts toward those behaviors. In the context of schedules of reinforcement, intermittent reinforcement can lead to sustained behaviors because it creates an expectation of reinforcement, which maintains motivation. These reinforcement principles help explain how behaviors are maintained or extinguished over time based on environmental contingencies and the distribution of reinforcement.

References

• Chance, P. (2013). Learning and Behavior: Essentials and Review (7th ed.). Wadsworth.
• Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of Reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Mazur, J. E. (2013). Learning and Behavior (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Michael, J. (1993). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59(3), 345–352.
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. Free Press.
• Sidman, M. (1989). Coercion and Its Fallout. Authors Cooperative, Inc.
• Staddon, J. E. R. (2001). Instrumental Learning: An Introduction. In L. P. Haselgrove & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Behavior Analysis.
• Weiss, M. (2011). The Law of Effect and its role in operant behavior. Contemporary Psychology, 56(2), 132–138.
• Reynolds, G. S. (1961). The law of experience: An experimental analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 31(2), 165–175.
• Lattal, K. M., & Neuringer, A. (1994). Reinforcement schedules: Theoretical and experimental analyses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62(3), 353–367.