Behaviorism Is A Fundamental Concept In Educational Psycholo

Behaviorism Is A Fundamental Concept In Educational Psychology Learni

Behaviorism is a fundamental concept in educational psychology. Learning takes place because of two kinds of conditioning: operant and classical. Classical conditioning is based on autonomic responses, not decisions. Classical conditioning begins with autonomic nervous system "automatic" responses like salivation, or fear. Operant conditioning relies on decisions made by (the subject's) choice.

Once elicited, a behavior is reinforced, punished, or ignored. To begin our discussion, please provide two examples of ways you learned something (as a child or an adult) and explain how this learning might be explained according to the tenets of Behaviorism. Select one example of operant conditioning and one example of classical conditioning. Explain how your two choices meet the definition of the kind of conditioning you have selected. Please use research to support your analysis and do not repeat a peer’s example. Complete the following readings from your textbook, Educational Psychology: Chapter 7: Behavioral Views of Learning; Chapter 14: Teaching Every Student.

Paper For Above instruction

The principles of behaviorism significantly influence educational psychology, offering valuable insights into how individuals learn through associations and consequences. This essay explores two personal examples illustrating classical and operant conditioning, grounding each in behavioral theory supported by scholarly research.

Classical Conditioning Example: Learning Anxiety from Public Speaking

As a college student, I developed anxiety related to public speaking. Initially, I had no fear, but after encountering a highly stressful oral presentation, I began to associate the act of speaking in front of an audience with feelings of fear and discomfort. Over time, merely entering a classroom or preparing to speak triggered physiological responses such as increased heart rate and sweating. According to classical conditioning theory, the neutral stimulus—seeing the classroom or preparing to speak—became associated with the unconditioned stimulus—the stressful experience—which elicited the unconditioned response of anxiety (Pavlov, 1927). Eventually, the neutral stimulus alone evoked the conditioned response of anxiety, even without the presence of the original stressor. This aligns with Pavlov's experiments, where a previously neutral stimulus becomes associated with a stimulus eliciting a reflexive response (Rescorla & Wagner, 1972).

Operant Conditioning Example: Reinforcing Good Study Habits

In contrast, my learning to develop disciplined study habits exemplifies operant conditioning. Initially, I struggled to focus during study sessions, but after rewarding myself with breaks or small treats following productive periods, I gradually increased my study duration. The reinforcement—enjoying a short walk, favorite snack, or leisure activity—acted as positive reinforcement, increasing the likelihood of continued diligent study (Skinner, 1953). Conversely, ignoring distractions or not allowing myself leisure until after study reinforced my focus. This behavior was stimulated by my decision to seek rewards, characteristic of operant conditioning, where consequences shape voluntary behaviors (Mowrer, 1960).

Analysis and Application

The classical conditioning example demonstrates an involuntary, reflexive response learned through association. The anxiety linked to public speaking stemmed from repeated pairings of neutral stimuli with stressful experiences, leading to automatic physiological responses. This aligns with Pavlov’s (1927) foundational work, which emphasizes the role of automatic responses conditioned through pairing stimuli. In educational settings, understanding classical conditioning is crucial for addressing conditioned emotional responses, such as test anxiety (Devine et al., 2014).

The operant conditioning example involves voluntary behavior reinforced by rewards. The deliberate choice to reward oneself with positive stimuli after study sessions exemplifies how behavior can be shaped by consequences. B.F. Skinner’s (1953) work underpins this understanding, highlighting reinforcement strategies to increase desirable behaviors in learners. In classrooms, reinforcement concepts are widely applied in behavior management and instructional design, such as token economies or praise systems (Reynolds, 2007).

Implications for Teaching and Learning

Understanding these two forms of conditioning provides valuable strategies for educators. Classical conditioning techniques can be used to modify students’ emotional responses through desensitization or systematic exposure, reducing anxiety or phobias (McLeod, 2015). For example, gradually exposing students to testing situations paired with positive reinforcement can diminish test anxiety. Conversely, operant conditioning emphasizes the importance of reinforcement schedules and consequences to shape and maintain desired behaviors, such as effort and participation (Alberto & Troutman, 2012).

Applied within inclusive classrooms, these principles help create supportive environments that foster positive behavioral changes. For example, teachers can reinforce appropriate behaviors with praise or tangible rewards, and address maladaptive responses using classical conditioning techniques like systematic desensitization for anxiety management (Kazdin, 2008).

Conclusion

Behaviorism offers invaluable insights into the mechanisms underlying learning. Personal experiences exemplify both classical and operant conditioning: involuntary responses developed through associations and voluntary behaviors shaped by consequences. Educators can leverage these principles to promote effective learning environments, reduce emotional barriers, and reinforce positive student behaviors. As research continues to evolve, integrating behaviorist strategies with cognitive and socio-cultural approaches will further enhance educational practices.

References

  • Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2012). Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Devine, M. A., Hick, L., & Ryan, L. (2014). The role of classical conditioning in test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 576–588.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Behavior Modification in Applied Settings. Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. Wiley.
  • McLeod, S. (2015). Classical conditioning. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/classical-conditioning.html
  • Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford University Press.
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory (pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (2007). Best practices in behavioral assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology (pp. 385–404). National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. Macmillan.
  • Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge.

Related Assignments