Beverly Pastor: Thanks For Allowing Me To Answer Your Concer

Beverlypastor Thanks For Allowing Me To Answer Your Concernspers

Beverly, “Pastor, thanks for allowing me to answer your concerns. Personally, I disagree with Jay Adams’ statement. I accept the position that all human beings, myself included, are innately sinful, but I do not agree that all of psychology is reduced to “sinful human beings sinfully thinking about sinful human beings.” Adams came along during a time in which a biblical approach to counseling was being overlooked and counselors were “too dependent on psychological literature” (Brewer & Peters, n.d., 11:20). Adams introduced “Nouthetic Counseling” and took a combative stance against psychology rather than an integrative approach (Entwistle, 2015, p. 200).

He stated the problem with people is sin and held the idea that Scripture is sufficient for dealing with all their counseling needs (Entwistle, 2015, pp. ). I agree sin is a problem for all because of the Fall, but there are problems that people may need help with that may not be helped by simple admonishment and warning. And though I see Scripture as Authority, I do not see it as a practical guide for counseling that ultimately renders the discipline of psychology as useless. Rather, God’s Word is the larger framework in which we can consider the subordinate discipline of psychology (Entwistle, 2015, p. 9).

Psychology is the “study of human behavior” that can be observed in God’s creative order of the world (Entwistle, 2015, p. 11). I hold that all truth is God’s truth; truth can be observed in the law of human nature and in Scripture, and all truth is “under God’s sovereignty” (Entwistle, 2015, p.182). I see Scripture and the discipline of psychology as allies. References Brewer, G. & Peters, C. (n.d.). COUC 506 Week One, Foundational and worldview issues of integration. [Film]. Lynchburg, VA: Liberty University. Entwistle, D. (2015). Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration (3rd ed). Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of psychology and Christian theology has been a topic of significant debate within the realm of Christian counseling. This discussion seeks to explore the nuanced perspectives surrounding the critical question: Can psychology be effectively integrated with biblical theology, or does it undermine the sufficiency of Scripture in addressing human problems? The conflicting viewpoints stem from differing views on the role of Scripture and the nature of human knowledge and behavior. On one side, proponents argue that psychology, as a scientific discipline created by God, can serve as a useful tool within a biblical framework, while others, like Jay Adams, advocate for a strictly biblical approach rooted solely in Scripture, opposing psychological theories that may conflict with biblical teachings.

Historically, Christian counselors like Jay Adams have emphasized the supremacy of biblical authority in addressing human issues, asserting that Scripture alone is sufficient for counseling needs. Adams’ Nouthetic Counseling (which emphasizes biblical confrontation and admonition) rejects the integration of secular psychological theories, perceiving them as potentially harmful or incompatible with biblical principles (Entwistle, 2015). Adams’ stance emerged as a reaction against secular influence in Christian counseling, which some saw as diluting biblical truth. However, critics argue that such an exclusive approach neglects the insights offered by the scientific understanding of human behavior, which can complement biblical principles (Brewer & Peters, n.d.).

The biblical perspective presented in Scripture emphasizes God’s sovereignty over all creation, including the human mind and behavior (Psalm 139:13-14). The model of "The Allies as Subjects of One Sovereign" described by Entwistle (2015) underscores the belief that all truth belongs to God and that both theology and science (including psychology) are under His rule. Under this framework, psychology becomes a valuable subordinate discipline that can offer insights into human behaviors and mental processes, which should be interpreted through a biblical lens. Such an approach advocates for a respectful integration where psychological findings are used to inform counseling practices, provided they align with biblical truths (Entwistle, 2015).

Furthermore, the argument that all human beings are innately sinful due to the Fall does not negate the utility of psychological theories. Instead, it frames the understanding that human nature is fallen and imperfect, which aligns with the psychological understanding of human behavior as complex, multifaceted, and often distorted by sin (Romans 3:23). The acknowledgment of human fallibility underscores the importance of both divine truth and scientific insights in providing holistic care. For example, psychological approaches such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) can be harmonized with biblical counseling by focusing on renewing the mind with biblical truths (Romans 12:2).

Recognizing the contribution of psychology does not diminish the authority of Scripture but rather complements it, helping believers address issues that extend beyond mere admonition. For example, mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, and trauma often require therapeutic interventions that can be informed by psychological research. When integrated appropriately, these interventions can serve as means through which God's truth is applied practically, enhancing the effectiveness of biblical counseling and expanding the ministerial tools available for pastors and counselors (Entwistle, 2015).

In conclusion, the integration of psychology and biblical theology offers a balanced perspective that recognizes the sovereignty of God over all knowledge while embracing the helpful insights derived from human sciences. This approach fosters a respectful dialogue where Scripture remains supreme, and psychology is seen as a valuable assistant in understanding and addressing human struggles. The effectiveness of this integration relies on discernment: ensuring that psychological theories and practices are consistent with biblical doctrine, thereby serving as tools in God's divine purpose of redemption and restoration (Entwistle, 2015). Such a perspective ultimately promotes a more comprehensive and compassionate approach to counseling that honors both divine authority and scientific discovery, reflecting the multifaceted nature of human beings as created in God's image.

References

• Brewer, G., & Peters, C. (n.d.). COUC 506 Week One, Foundational and worldview issues of integration. [Film]. Lynchburg, VA: Liberty University.
• Entwistle, D. (2015). Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration (3rd ed.). Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
• Psalm 139:13-14, New International Version.
• Romans 3:23, New International Version.
• Romans 12:2, New International Version.