Blackboard Strayer University HRM Questions 076792

4232019 Httpsblackboardstrayeredubbcswebdavinstitutionhrm56

Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Formulate three valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two diagnostic tools and defend why they are the best choice. Using one of the selected diagnostic tools, assess the organization’s readiness for change and provide results of the diagnostic analysis. Explain these results. Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change, substantiating your conclusion with current change management theories.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding how organizations manage change is crucial in today’s dynamic business environment. This paper aims to analyze a specific company's current HR practices requiring change, formulate reasons grounded in change management theories, select appropriate diagnostic tools, and assess organizational readiness for change.

The company selected for this analysis is ABC Corporation, operating within the manufacturing industry. Established over two decades ago, ABC Corporation has grown to employ approximately 5,000 employees across several regions. The company has built a reputation for quality products but currently faces challenges with employee turnover and stagnating productivity, which threaten its competitive edge.

Currently, ABC Corporation’s HR policy emphasizes traditional hierarchical structures and standardized procedures that have become less effective amid rapid market shifts. One specific HR process needing revision is the performance appraisal system, which is viewed as outdated and discourages innovation and employee engagement. The existing process relies heavily on annual reviews, primarily focusing on past performance without fostering continuous feedback or development.

The necessity for change can be supported by Lewin’s Change Management Model, which emphasizes unfreezing current behaviors, implementing change, and refreezing new processes. Applying this theory, the company must address the resistance that arises from existing routines by demonstrating the benefits of a revamped HR process aligned with strategic goals (Lewin, 1951). Additionally, Kotter’s Eight-Step Change Model provides a framework where establishing a sense of urgency around obsolete HR practices can motivate stakeholders towards adopting new, innovative approaches (Kotter, 1995). The three reasons for change include reducing employee turnover through improved engagement, increasing productivity by fostering continuous development, and aligning HR practices with modern, flexible work environments.

To evaluate whether ABC Corporation is prepared for implementing change, diagnostic tools such as the Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) assessment and the Change Readiness Survey are suitable choices. The ORC identifies internal factors like leadership support, employee attitudes, and available resources (Holt et al., 2007). The Change Readiness Survey assesses perceptions of change, communication effectiveness, and willingness among staff. These tools are highly regarded because they provide comprehensive insights into both organizational and employee levels, essential for planning and executing change initiatives (Weiner, 2009).

Using the ORC tool, an assessment was conducted, revealing moderate organizational readiness. Leadership demonstrated strong support for change, but employees exhibited reservations due to previous failed initiatives. The analysis showed that communication was lacking clarity and transparency, which hindered staff buy-in. Resource allocation appeared adequate, yet the cultural resistance was significant, highlighting the need for targeted engagement strategies.

The results suggest that while the organization possesses some of the necessary elements for successful change, considerable work remains to improve communication and foster a culture receptive to change. This aligns with Kotter’s model, which emphasizes the importance of building a guiding coalition and communicating the vision effectively (Kotter, 1997). The partial readiness necessitates tailored interventions, such as leadership coaching, employee involvement programs, and transparent communication channels.

Interpreting the findings through the lens of change management theory indicates that ABC Corporation is at a transitional stage where change is feasible but not guaranteed. The organization’s support structures are present, but overcoming cultural resistance is critical. Employing Lewin's model, the company must focus on unfreezing current mindsets, implementing inclusive participation in change processes, and anchoring new HR practices within the organizational culture. Current research advocates that addressing both technical and soft aspects of change enhances the likelihood of success (Beer & Nohria, 2000). By aligning diagnostic insights with strategic change initiatives, ABC can better navigate its transformation journey.

In conclusion, successful organizational change in ABC Corporation hinges on understanding its unique context and employing suitable diagnostic tools. The organization shows promising signs of readiness but needs targeted strategies to address resistance. Applying change management theories provides a solid foundation for planning, executing, and sustaining meaningful HR reforms that support strategic objectives and long-term growth.

References

References

• Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). What's your change management strategy? Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 103-111.
• Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Employee stakeholder perceptions of organizational change: Implications for commitment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(4), 481-505.
• Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.
• Kotter, J. P. (1997). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. Harper & Brothers.
• Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, 67.
• Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating Readiness for Organizational Change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681-703.
• Appelbaum, S. H., Habashy, S., Malo, J.-L., & Shafiq, H. (2012). Back to the future: Revisiting Kotter's 8-step change model. Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 764-782.
• By, R. T. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369-380.
• Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide to the Models, Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change. Kogan Page.