Book Précis – For This Assignment, You’ll Write A Précis On
Book Précis – For this assignment, you’ll write a précis on the
Assignment needs to be done by 7:00 pm central time on Sunday November 19, 2017 pm Book Précis – For this assignment, you’ll write a précis on the required readings (book and articles) used in this course. A précis is a summary and critical evaluation of scholarly works (In this case a book and at minimum three articles). It will typically take the following form: A. Full bibliographic citation in Chicago of Style Manual format of the book. B.
First paragraph: an objective summary or abstract of the publication. This paragraph should present the information as objectively as possible. You’ll have a chance to critique the argument in the second part of your précis. You should not use the abstract published for the book. The first paragraph should contain the following information: 1.
The overall argument that the author is making, including the author’s thesis, the logical thread of the argument, the kinds of support provided, and so forth. If the author invents or uses special terms to argue the case, mention and define them. 2. The context for the argument. What critics or points of view is the author attempting to refute?
Where does the author’s argument fit into the larger critical discussion of the issue? Is the author attempting to overthrow certain assumptions about the work, and, if so, what are those assumptions? C. Second and third paragraphs: a critical analysis of the publication. In this paragraph, you’ll assess the strengths and weaknesses of the article and discuss the implications of its reasoning for future study of the work.
These questions may help you get started: 1. What parts of the book/articles were especially strong or insightful, and why? 2. In what parts of the scholarly works (if any) did the author make claims that were not supported by the evidence? Were there any flaws in the logic of the piece?
3. In what ways is this book useful for understanding the historical topic covered? How significant is it? D. You may use more paragraphs if you need to, but you should follow this basic format.
E. Length: Approximately 2 typed, double-spaced pages.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires writing a scholarly précis that critically summarizes and evaluates the key readings for a course, including at least one book and three articles. The précis should begin with a full bibliographic citation of the chosen book, formatted according to Chicago Style Manual guidelines. The first paragraph must objectively summarize the work by articulating the author’s overall argument, thesis, supporting evidence, and any specialized terminology used. It should also situate the work within larger scholarly debates, identifying what perspectives or assumptions the author seeks to challenge or overturn.
Following the summary, the next two paragraphs should provide a critical assessment of the publication. This includes evaluating the strengths and insightful contributions of the work, identifying any unsupported claims or logical flaws, and discussing how the publication enhances the understanding of the relevant historical topic. The discussion should also consider the significance of the work for future scholarly research in the field.
The paper should be approximately two double-spaced pages, structured to facilitate clarity and critical engagement. Multiple paragraphs can be used if necessary, but the overall format must follow the prescribed sequence: objective summary, critical analysis, and conclusion on the work’s scholarly importance.
References
- AuthorLastName, FirstName. Title of Book. City of Publication: Publisher, Year.
- AuthorLastName, FirstName. "Title of Article." Journal Name Volume.Issue (Year): pages.
- AuthorLastName, FirstName. "Title of Second Article." Journal Name Volume.Issue (Year): pages.
- AuthorLastName, FirstName. "Title of Third Article." Journal Name Volume.Issue (Year): pages.
- Additional references as needed, formatted similarly.