Brief Assessment Of The Work Environment Results

Brief Assessment Of The Results Of Work Environment Assessment1based

Brief assessment of the Results of Work Environment Assessment 1. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Based on the results, my score was 60, workplace is mildly Healthy. This indicates that my workplace is not a very civil environment.

Explain why your workplace is or is not civil? My workplace is not civil because of lack of proper and respectful communications among employees and employers. Most of the leadership are disrespectful towards each other and this really affects the workplace environment, and therefore interferes with employee’s morale, which in turn affects patient care. Very poor communications are also seen between the employers and their employees (Smith et al., 1994). Another reason that makes me feel that my workplace is not civil is heavy workload on the employees. The employees are assigned a lot of tasks to do which they can’t really be manage in a timely manner and hence more nurses should be employed to reduce the workload to provide more efficient patient care (Forstater et al., 2004).

Describe a situation you have experienced incivility in the workplace. A situation where I experienced incivility in my workplace was being denied a chance of being promoted after advancement. I went for my advancement studies and pursued a bachelor’s degree. Before leaving for my studies, I was promised to be promoted to a leadership role which I was denied after completing my bachelor’s Degree, not due to merit, or my work ethic. I was overlooked because of the friendship between the director of nursing and perspective assistant director of nursing, and therefore the job was given to the friend (Lawn et al., 2004).

How was this addressed? This incivility was addressed by leadership being transferred to another organization after a series of disagreements with the employers.

References

  • Forstater, M. (2004). Green jobs: addressing the critical issues surrounding the environment, workplace, and employment. International Journal Of Environment, Workplace And Employment, 1(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijewe.2004.005603
  • Lawn, P. (2004). Environment, workplace, and employment: an introduction. International Journal Of Environment, Workplace And Employment, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijewe.2004.005601
  • Smith, E. (1994). Workplace assessment. The Annals Of Occupational Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/38.1.1

Paper For Above instruction

The assessment of work environment civility is a crucial aspect of ensuring productive and harmonious workplace relations. A workplace’s civility directly impacts employee morale, patient outcomes in healthcare settings, and overall organizational efficiency. This paper provides an analysis of a recent work environment assessment, focusing on the level of civility, identified issues, personal experiences of incivility, and potential strategies for improvement.

Firstly, the workplace received a score of 60, categorizing it as mildly healthy but not highly civil. This indicates room for improvement in fostering a respectful and cooperative work environment. Civility should ideally encompass respectful communication, recognition of employees’ contributions, and a supportive management style. The current state, characterized by disrespectful interactions and poor communication, undermines these elements and hampers effective teamwork. According to Smith et al. (1994), poor communication and lack of respect among staff and leadership contribute substantially to workplace incivility.

One core issue identified is the communication gap between employees and management. Leaders often exhibit disrespectful behaviors, which set a negative tone and diminish morale. Such environments can lead to burnout, reduced productivity, and compromised patient care in healthcare settings. Additionally, excessive workloads accentuate stress levels and contribute to a perception of unfair treatment. As Forstater et al. (2004) suggest, increasing staffing levels could alleviate workload pressures, thereby enhancing overall workplace civility and efficiency.

Personal experiences highlighted in the assessment reinforce these issues. A notable incident involved being overlooked for promotion despite fulfilling all requirements, including acquiring a bachelor’s degree. The promotion was promised prior to study leave but was ultimately denied, allegedly due to favoritism linked to personal relationships between senior staff members. This form of incivility not only demoralizes individuals but also erodes trust in leadership. Lawn et al. (2004) describe such favoritism and unfair treatment as detrimental to workplace cohesion and professionalism.

The resolution involved leadership changes, where the offending management was transferred to another organization following conflicts and disagreements. While this was a temporary fix, it highlights the need for systemic interventions to promote civility, such as establishing clear communication protocols, fostering a culture of respect, and implementing transparent promotion policies. Such measures can help build a more civil environment that supports both employee well-being and quality of care.

To improve the work environment, organizations should prioritize respectful communication, equitable treatment, and workload management. Training programs on civility, conflict resolution, and leadership development can also promote positive interactions. Regular assessments and feedback mechanisms will enable continuous improvement and help sustain a respectful workplace culture. Literature by Smith et al. (1994), Forstater et al. (2004), and Lawn et al. (2004) affirms that creating a culture of civility is vital for organizational success.

In conclusion, the work environment assessment reveals significant challenges related to civility, predominantly stemming from poor communication, disrespectful interactions, and workload issues. Addressing these factors requires implementing systemic policies that promote respect and fairness. Such initiatives are essential for enhancing employee morale, ensuring quality patient care, and fostering a collaborative work culture. Ultimately, cultivating civility is a continuous process that necessitates commitment and proactive leadership to realize a positive and productive workplace environment.