BSC Implementation: The Internal Business Process Perspectiv
Bsc Implementation The Internal Business Process Perspectivefor Modu
BSC Implementation & the Internal Business Process Perspective For Module 3, consider the organization's mission and strategy from the perspective of its internal business processes (from your work on the case, your previous course work, and your background reading, you should be reasonably clear what such business processes are). In this section of the assignment you’ll begin to identify objectives and measures relevant to that perspective. Refer back to this presentation on objectives if you need to. SLP Assignment Expectations Once you’re reasonably clear on what’s involved, think about your organization and its business processes, and then: Identify at least three objectives for improving the organization's internal business processes, and show how they relate to the mission, vision, and strategy of the organization. For each objective, develop at least one meaningful performance measure (metric). For each objective, identify at least one expected level of performance (target). For each objective, identify at least one new action or program that needs to be developed to ensure successful implementation of the organization's strategy (initiative). Comment briefly on the relationships of the process objectives that you've identified here to the finance objectives that you identified in the Module 1 SLP assignment and/or the customer service objectives that you identified in the Module 2 SLP assignment. How do they help to fulfill those objectives? If they don't (and they don't have to), what makes them more important than objectives that would relate to finance or customer service? Finally, do you wish to make any changes to your Module 1 or Module 2 objective write-ups in light of your Module 3 experience? Here’s a table that you may wish to copy and fill in (the boxes are expandable - take all the space you need to be complete in your descriptions. No more than 2-3 pages should be necessary.) Objective Measure Target Action Relationships to other objectives Revisions (if any) to Module 1 and/or Module 2 Objectives Objective/Module Measure Target Action Privacy Policy | Contact
Paper For Above instruction
The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a strategic management tool that enables organizations to translate their vision and strategy into specific objectives across multiple perspectives, including financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. For this assignment, we focus on the internal business process perspective, which is critical for operational excellence and aligning day-to-day activities with strategic goals. This paper identifies three objectives for improving internal business processes, links them to the organization’s mission and strategy, proposes relevant performance measures and targets, and discusses associated initiatives. Additionally, the relationships between these process objectives and other strategic objectives from earlier modules are examined to elucidate their role within the broader organizational framework.
Objective 1: Streamline Operational Processes to Enhance Efficiency
This objective aims to reduce process cycle times and eliminate redundancies in core operations such as manufacturing or service delivery. It directly supports the organization’s strategic goal of increasing productivity and reducing costs, aligning with its mission to deliver value efficiently. A key performance measure for this objective is the process cycle time, with a target of reducing cycle times by 20% within 12 months. An initiative to achieve this could involve investing in automation technology or re-engineering workflows to eliminate non-value-adding activities. Improving operational efficiency enhances the organization's capacity to serve customers faster and more reliably, thus supporting its customer satisfaction objectives indirectly but significantly.
Objective 2: Improve Quality Control Measures to Reduce Defects
The second objective focuses on enhancing quality assurance processes to decrease defective outputs. This aligns with the strategic vision of delivering high-quality products/services that meet or exceed customer expectations. The performance measure might be the defect rate per batch or unit, with a target of reducing defects by 15% over the next year. Implementing advanced quality management systems or staff training programs would be the primary initiatives. High-quality outputs reduce rework costs, increase customer satisfaction, and foster brand reputation, which indirectly supports financial objectives by reducing costs associated with returns and warranty claims.
Objective 3: Increase Flexibility and Responsiveness of Processes
This objective seeks to modify internal processes to be more adaptable to changing market demands and customer preferences. It corroborates the organization’s strategic emphasis on innovation and agility. A relevant performance measure is the response time to customer requests or order changes, targeting a 25% reduction in response times over six months. Initiatives might include adopting flexible manufacturing systems or agile project management methodologies. Enhanced responsiveness leads to improved customer satisfaction and competitive advantage, linking primarily to customer-centric strategic goals but also reinforcing financial performance through increased sales.
Relationship to Finance and Customer Service Objectives
While these internal process objectives primarily target operational excellence, they also underpin financial performance and customer satisfaction. For instance, improved efficiency reduces costs, directly impacting profitability. Better quality control minimizes rework and warranty expenses, further supporting financial health. Simultaneously, increased process flexibility enhances the customer experience by enabling faster response times and customized solutions, thus bolstering customer loyalty. In earlier modules, financial objectives focused on increasing revenues and reducing costs, whereas customer service objectives targeted satisfaction and loyalty. The process objectives reinforce these by ensuring that internal operations support the achievement of these external goals, underscoring their strategic importance.
Reflections and Potential Revisions
Considering my experience from Modules 1 and 2, I recognize that integrating process improvement initiatives more closely with financial and customer objectives can create a more cohesive strategic approach. For example, linking defect reduction not only to quality but also to cost savings would strengthen the rationale for quality initiatives. Similarly, emphasizing responsiveness in internal processes aligns with customer satisfaction metrics. These insights suggest that I might revise my earlier objectives to highlight the interconnectedness of internal processes with broader strategic outcomes, fostering a more integrated balanced scorecard system.
Table of Process Objectives and Strategic Linkages
| Objective | Measure | Target | Action | Relationships to other objectives | Revisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streamline operational workflows | Cycle time in key processes | Reduce by 20% in 12 months | Implement automation and workflow re-engineering | Supports cost reduction and customer satisfaction | Revised to emphasize integration with quality improvements |
| Reduce defect rates | Defect rate per batch | Decrease by 15% in 12 months | Upgrade quality systems; staff training | Helps lower costs and improve product quality perception | Aligned with operational efficiency goals |
| Enhance process responsiveness | Response time to customer requests | Reduce response time by 25% within 6 months | Adopt agile project management and flexible manufacturing | Boosts customer satisfaction and operational agility | Made more explicit in linking with customer satisfaction metrics |
Conclusion
Developing targeted internal business process objectives within the Balanced Scorecard framework facilitates strategic alignment and operational improvement. These objectives, corresponding measures, and initiatives not only drive efficiency and quality but also have broader implications for financial success and customer satisfaction. Recognizing their interconnectedness enhances strategic decision-making and ensures that internal processes effectively support the organization’s overall mission and vision.
References
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75-85.
- Niven, P. R. (2006). Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results. John Wiley & Sons.
- Atkinson, H., Balakrishnan, M. S., Booth, P., & Speckbacher, G. (2016). Management Accounting and Integrated Reporting: The Roles of Purpose, Principles, and Process. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(4), 805-830.
- Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance Measurement System Design: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 38-56.
- Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management Control Systems and Strategy: A Critical Literature Review. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1-38.
- Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. Harvard Business School Press.
- Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated Performance Measurement Systems: A Development Guide. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(5), 531-545.
- Huang, M. H., & Lin, C. C. (2007). The Development of a Balanced Scorecard for the Health Promotion Program. Journal of Health Management, 9(2), 101-113.
- Sharma, D. D., & Kumar, S. (2011). The Balanced Scorecard in Strategic Management research: A review. Journal of Management & Strategy, 2(4), 53-63.