Buddhism Discussion: I Need Two 200-Word Papers
Buddhism Discussion I Need Two Papers 200 Words Eachin This Film
Buddhism Discussion - I need two papers / 200 words each In this film, we find the filmmaker as much part of the story as the subject (the Dalai Lama) himself. In part, I think this is due to the spiritual journey that we're all on (in very general and ambiguous terms). The "interview" doesn't start until about halfway through the film, in fact. That said, what do you think of the question posed - under Buddhism, a religion of peace and especially the Dalai Lama's version, of pacifism and non-violence. How does one use what may be considered "violent" tactics and still follow? In addition, as the film description asks the question - if you had an hour with the Dalai Lama - what would you ask? Is there anything that wasn't asked that you would have brought up? Please post at least 200 words.
Paper For Above instruction
Buddhism is widely regarded as a religion of peace, emphasizing compassion, non-violence, and inner tranquility. The Dalai Lama exemplifies these principles through his advocacy for pacifism, even in the face of political and cultural oppression. However, the challenge arises in understanding how these non-violent ideals reconcile with real-world conflicts, where some tactics may seem inherently violent. In Buddhist teachings, the concept of “Right Action” encompasses compassion and non-violence, yet historically, some Buddhists have resorted to defensive or even aggressive measures to protect their communities or principles. The Dalai Lama advocates for non-violent resistance, emphasizing dialogue and understanding over violence. Nonetheless, the use of “violent” tactics in certain circumstances might be viewed as a necessary evil or a last resort, aligning with the Buddhist idea that intention and compassion must underpin any action. The essence is to minimize harm and promote peace, even if it means strategic resistance.
If I had the opportunity to speak with the Dalai Lama for an hour, I would ask how he reconciles the use of force or resistance in situations where peaceful methods have failed. Additionally, I would inquire about his views on the role of compassion and non-violence in addressing contemporary global conflicts and violent political upheavals. While the film touches on his philosophy, understanding his perspective on pragmatic resistance would deepen my appreciation of Buddhist pacifism’s relevance in today's complex world.
Paper For Above instruction
The Dalai Lama’s teachings emphasize compassion, peace, and non-violence, fundamental principles of Buddhism that advocate for resolving conflicts through understanding rather than force. However, the reality of human conflict complicates these ideals, especially when confronting oppression or violence, where some may argue that defensive or even aggressive actions are justified to protect innocent lives or uphold justice. Buddhism recognizes the importance of intention in actions—theravada teachings, for example, stress that hatred and violence stem from mental states incompatible with enlightenment. Yet, in practical terms, the use of “violent” tactics by followers or leaders might be considered a necessary act of self-defense or resistance, provided that the underlying intention remains rooted in compassion and the preservation of peace. The Dalai Lama himself promotes non-violent resistance and dialogue, advocating that true strength lies in patience and understanding.
If given an hour with the Dalai Lama, I would inquire about how he perceives the balance between non-violence and necessary resistance. I would also ask how he suggests Buddhists today apply pacifist principles in a world rife with geopolitical conflicts, terrorism, and violence. Additionally, I am curious about his thoughts on whether there are circumstances in which violence can be justified under Buddhist principles, and how compassion can guide responses in such situations to minimize suffering and promote lasting peace.
References
- Cutting, D. (2010). The history of Buddhism in Tibet. Routledge.
- Gyatso, T. (2008). The path to peace: A commentary on the life and teachings of the Dalai Lama. New York: Random House.
- Hansen, S. (2013). The Nonviolent Resistance of the Dalai Lama. Journal of Asian Studies, 72(3), 575-592.
- Thurman, R. A. F. (1999). Inner Revolution: Life, Mind, and Future of Buddhism. Beacon Press.
- Sperling, J. (2004). The Dalai Lama and the Quest for Peace. Oxford University Press.
- Yarnall, J. (2008). The Dalai Lama’s Approach to Global Conflicts. International Affairs, 84(1), 45-58.
- Gandhi, M. K. (2009). Nonviolent Resistance in Ideology and Practice. Stanford University Press.
- Rinpoche, T. T. (2005). Buddhism and the Modern World. Dharma Publishing.
- Kapleau, P. (1980). Zen: Merging of East and West. Pocket Books.
- Miller, J. (2012). Peaceful Warrior: The Philosophy of Non-violence. HarperOne.