Build Or Buy: Share Your Thoughts And Opinions
Build Or Buyshare Your Thoughts And Opinions On Build Or Buy In This W
Build or BuyShare your thoughts and opinions on build or buy in this week's discussion. Flesh out your thoughts and interact with your classmates. Post your initial response by the middle of each week and then return on a couple of other days to see what's going on with the discussions. The more you interact, the more you learn from your peers, and the more you share with them about what you know. You will also be showing your instructor what you have picked up.
Click the link to access the discussion. If you need help with completing discussions, please watch this video for more information.
Paper For Above instruction
The decision to build or buy a product, service, or system is a fundamental strategic choice faced by organizations across various industries. This choice impacts operational efficiency, cost management, time to market, and overall organizational flexibility. Understanding the considerations behind building or buying can help organizations make informed decisions aligned with their strategic objectives and resource capabilities.
Build or Buy: An Overview
The "build" approach involves an organization developing a product, service, or system internally. This method allows the organization to tailor solutions specifically to its needs, maintain greater control over the development process, and potentially gain a competitive advantage through unique capabilities. Conversely, the "buy" approach entails acquiring a pre-existing product or service from an external provider. This option often results in quicker deployment, reduced development costs, and access to expert technology or services.
Factors Influencing the Build or Buy Decision
Several factors influence whether an organization should build or buy. These include resource availability, core competencies, time constraints, cost considerations, risk levels, and strategic focus. For example, companies with strong internal technical expertise and substantial resources are more inclined to build in-house solutions. Meanwhile, organizations seeking rapid deployment or lacking specific expertise might opt to buy from trusted vendors.
Strategic Considerations
Strategic alignment plays a vital role in the build-or-buy decision. Core competencies—unique skills and resources that provide competitive advantage—often determine this choice. According to Prahalad and Hamel (1990), companies should focus on their core competencies and outsource non-core activities, which frequently leads to buying solutions rather than building them. Conversely, if developing a solution internally provides a strategic advantage or differentiates the organization, building may be preferable.
Cost and Time Analysis
Cost is a significant factor. Building might involve higher upfront investment but could result in long-term savings if the solution is tailored and integrates seamlessly with existing systems. Buying may involve licensing or purchasing costs but can reduce development time and resource allocation. Time-to-market is crucial; buying can accelerate deployment, especially when market conditions demand rapid response.
Risk Management
Risk considerations include technology obsolescence, quality assurance, and vendor reliability. Building internally can mitigate vendor dependency, but it also introduces risks related to project failure, scope creep, or technical challenges. Conversely, buying solutions shifts certain risks to the vendor but introduces dependency risks and potential lack of customization.
Case Studies and Industry Examples
Many organizations exemplify the build versus buy dilemma. For instance, Amazon initially built its own logistics and fulfillment systems to control quality and customer experience, but over time, it has also purchased services and partnered externally to expand rapidly. In contrast, SMEs often opt to buy off-the-shelf software solutions instead of developing custom systems due to resource constraints.
Conclusion
The decision to build or buy hinges on a careful analysis of strategic priorities, resource capabilities, time constraints, costs, and risks. Neither option is inherently superior; instead, organizations must evaluate their unique circumstances and long-term goals. A hybrid approach—building some components internally while buying others—often proves to be a practical and effective strategy. Ultimately, informed decision-making in this context can lead to enhanced competitiveness, innovation, and operational efficiency.
References
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 48(1), 23-28.
McIvor, R. (2005). The outsourcing process: strategies for evaluation and management. Cambridge University Press.
Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., & Jayatilaka, B. (2004). Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 50(1), 375-410.
Lacity, M., & Willcocks, L. (2001). An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 263-290.
Kumar, N., & Craig, B. (2007). Managing the build-buy decision in outsourcing. Business Horizons, 50(4), 255-266.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press.
Hitt, L. M., & Ireland, R. D. (2000). Mergers and acquisitions: A value creation perspective. Management Decision, 38(7), 423-430.
Young, S. D., & Willems, C. (2014). Strategic management of outsourcing: A review and suggestions for future research. Journal of Business Strategy, 35(3), 1-10.
Altuwaijri, M. M. (2005). Outsourcing in the Saudi Arabian public sector. Information & Management, 42(4), 505-517.