BUSI 303 Discussion Board Instructions 1

BUSI 303 Discussion Board Instructions 1

In Weeks 1, 3, 5, & 7, students are instructed to select one key term from the Key Terms document posted within each module. They must declare their topic by posting a new thread in the related discussion board (DB) forum, titling it with their chosen key term. Each student must choose a different key term, ensuring no duplication of topics. They are required to conduct an Internet search to find at least three recent articles related to the key term, utilizing reputable sources such as the Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, or The Economist, or through EBSCOhost accessible via Liberty’s online library. Websites like about.com, Britannica.com, or Wikipedia do not qualify as scholarly sources.

For the selected article, students must write a review including a definition of the key term, a summary of the article in their own words, and a discussion of how the article relates to the chapter and key term. All three articles read must be posted in the references section, with proper APA citations and annotations. The review itself must be at least 200 words. Students must post their review in a new thread or as a reply to their original thread and then submit the Word document for the assignment.

In Weeks 2, 4, 6, & 8, students are required to post substantive responses of at least 100 words each to at least two classmates’ threads. These replies should analyze the initial posts beyond simple agreement, incorporating additional outside research and substantive discussion. The original discussion threads and responses must be copied and pasted within the discussion box and attached as Word documents.

Meeting only the minimum requirements will result in a minimum grade. Plagiarism is strictly prohibited and will result in severe academic penalties, including zeros, failing grades, or expulsion. Using research from other courses is permitted, provided all assignment requirements are met. Late submissions will receive zero credit. If any questions arise, students should contact their instructor.

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion board instructions for BUSI 303 emphasize the importance of active engagement and critical analysis in the context of international business concepts. Students are guided through a systematic process that not only enhances their understanding of key terms but also fosters research skills, critical thinking, and scholarly communication. This structured approach encourages students to connect theoretical concepts from the textbook with real-world applications evidenced in recent journalistic articles and scholarly sources.

The initial step involves selecting a key term from the designated Key Terms document for each module, fostering an environment of organized and focused discussion. By requiring students to post a new thread with their selected key term, the instructions promote ownership of their topic and prevent duplication, thereby ensuring a rich diversity of discussion and exploration of various facets of international business. This process underscores the importance of specificity and originality in academic discourse.

Research constitutes a cornerstone of this assignment, with students tasked to locate at least three recent and reputable articles related to their chosen key term. Resources such as the Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, and The Economist are highlighted to ensure the research is grounded in credible, current information. Through this research, students develop skills in discerning scholarly sources from non-academic websites, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of academic work.

The review process involves a multi-faceted analytical framework, requiring students to define their key term, summarize their selected article in an original manner, and discuss its relevance to the chapter and key concepts. This method encourages deep engagement with the material, fostering critical analysis and synthesis. Including proper APA citations and annotations further develops students’ academic writing skills, preparing them for professional scholarly communication.

The iterative nature of posting initial threads and subsequent responses develops communication and critical thinking. Engaging with classmates’ posts through substantial replies of at least 100 words enhances collaborative learning and helps students explore diverse perspectives. The requirement to copy and paste posts as Word documents ensures proper documentation and allows instructors to verify engagement and comprehension.

Adherence to academic integrity standards is emphasized, with strict penalties for plagiarism. The instructions clarify that research from other courses can be reused if all requirements are met, which promotes ethical research practices. Additionally, clear policies on late submissions underscore the importance of timeliness and accountability.

Overall, these instructions aim to cultivate a rigorous academic environment where students actively synthesize, critique, and apply international business concepts in a manner that prepares them for professional and scholarly pursuits. Through structured research, critical discussion, and ethical engagement, students build valuable skills that extend beyond the classroom.

References

• Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., Riesenberger, J. R., Rammal, H. G., & Rose, E. L. (2014). International Business. Pearson Australia.
• Ghemawat, P. (2017). The Laws of Globalization and Business Applications. Cambridge University Press.
• Hill, C. W., & Hult, G. M. (2019). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Shenkar, O., & Luo, Y. (2008). International Business. Routledge.
• Yip, G. S. (2003). Total Global Strategy II. Pearson Education.
• Fletcher, R. (2010). International Business. Oxford University Press.
• Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2008). A Perspective on Regional and Global Strategies of Multinational Enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 817-833.
• Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in Global Industries. Harvard Business Review, 64(2), 47-60.
• Lu, V. N., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International Business: Strategy and the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(3), 211-227.