Busi 340 Definition: Managerial Leadership Discussion Board

Busi 340definitionmanagerial Leadershipdiscussion Board Instructions

BUSI 340 Definition : Managerial Leadership Discussion Board Instructions The learning theories, upon which this course is based, are actualized in the Discussion Board Forums. At the beginning of each module/week, you will choose a key term to research. You will be required to write a thread of at least 400 words on the topic, complete with page references and specifics to document the response, and post it to the corresponding Discussion Board Forum. Correct use of English and grammar are required. 1.

Conduct an Internet search to find and read 3 recent articles that relate to the term. 2. Select the 1 article that you wish to discuss. 3. Post a new thread that contains the following information in the following format, using the headers so that you ensure that all aspects of the assignment are completed as required.

Failure to follow these instructions will result in a 1-point deduction. a. Definition : Give a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the 400-word requirement. b. Summary : Give a brief summary of the selected article, in your own words. c. Discussion : i. Give a brief discussion of how the article relates to the selected chapter key term. This gives you the opportunity to add value to the discussion by sharing your experiences, thoughts, and opinions. Draw your peers into discussion of topics by asking questions . This is the most important part of the posting! Discussion Board Example Groupthink Definition: Organizational Behavior notes, “Groupthink is the tendency of highly cohesive groups to value consensus at the price of decision quality†(McShane & Von Glinow, 2008, p. 257).

Summary: The article entitled “The Turn to Online Research is Narrowing the Range of Modern Scholarship, a New Study Suggests†written by Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow discusses how the internet has made accessing research and other things on the internet extremely easy. By using search engines this has caused groupthink for many students conducting research. (Instructor Note: This is a shorter summary. Do not feel like you have to limit yourself to this length in the summary section.)

Discussion: The internet has made performing research for students a matter of seconds. Students used to have to go to the library and conduct research out of textbooks and other publications but now by simply typing your subject in a search engine a variety of choices are at your fingertips.

“Millions of journal articles are available online, enabling scholars to find material they never would have encountered at their university libraries†(Tuhus-Dubrow). A recent study by James Evans, a sociologist at the University of Chicago, has “determined that as more journal issues came online news papers referenced a relatively smaller pool of articles which tended to be more recent, at the expense of older and more obscure work†(Tuhus-Dubrow). The internet just like everything else has it costs as well as benefits. Just like the article states the internet has started to dominate people’s lives. People rely on the internet for everything for both work and personal use.

“Our daily experience- what we watch, listen to, and read; the people we date and the friendships we maintain—is increasingly shaped by the vast information landscape of the internet, and how it is filtered for personal use†(Tuhus-Dubrow). The internet is considered to be a new form of groupthink because when searching for articles students are not highly selective in the choices they make and they tend to pick one of the few search choices that comes up. Also, the other alternatives of research are now not used due to the convenience of the internet. “Search engines must present results in some kind of order and most sites rely on tools that rank results primarily in two ways: in reverse chronological order and by popularity†(Tuhus-Dubrow).

If a search engine filters results by popularity then this is groupthink because others are succumbing to the will of the group by choosing the same articles that show up first as results. Do you feel that internet search engines cause groupthink? If so, elaborate on why you think this. Do you feel that this is why many professors at Liberty University want students to not choose the same discussion board topics? I personally feel that the reason professors want us to chose different topics is so that we will not reflect the same views and chose the same articles which would therefore be groupthink.

Paper For Above instruction

Management and leadership are foundational components of organizational success, deeply rooted in various theories and practices that influence how leaders motivate, guide, and influence their teams. In understanding managerial leadership, it is essential to explore key concepts such as transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and servant leadership, as these approaches offer different perspectives on motivating employees and achieving organizational goals. This paper aims to examine the significance of managerial leadership through an analysis of relevant literature, highlighting its practical applications and potential challenges.

Throughout the course, a recurring focus has been on transformational leadership, which emphasizes inspiring and motivating followers to transcend their individual interests for the sake of the organization. Burns (1978) initially conceptualized transformational leadership, which has been extensively studied and applied in various contexts. Transformational leaders are characterized by their ability to articulate a compelling vision, foster innovation, and provide individualized support. Research indicates that transformational leadership positively impacts organizational performance, employee satisfaction, and innovation (Bass & Avolio, 1994). For instance, leaders who empower employees and foster a sense of purpose tend to enhance productivity and workplace morale.

In contrast, transactional leadership revolves around clear exchanges or transactions between leaders and followers. This approach emphasizes routine, compliance, and reward-based motivation. Burns (1978) also contributed to the development of transactional leadership, which includes contingent rewards and management-by-exception. While transactional leadership is effective in stable environments requiring routine tasks, it may lack the motivational spark needed for innovation and change (Bass, 1995). Therefore, understanding when to employ transactional versus transformational leadership is crucial for effective management, especially in dynamic organizational settings.

Servant leadership offers another perspective, focusing on serving others' needs and prioritizing followers' growth and well-being. Greenleaf (1970) introduced the concept of servant leadership, which emphasizes ethical behavior, empathy, and community-building. Servant leaders prioritize listening, stewardship, and the development of their team members, fostering trust and loyalty. Recent studies suggest that servant leadership correlates with higher levels of employee engagement and organizational citizenship behaviors (Liden et al., 2008). This approach is increasingly relevant in contemporary organizations that value ethical practices and sustainable leadership.

Effective managerial leadership involves adapting different styles to fit organizational context and employee needs. For example, a highly innovative startup may benefit from transformational leadership's vision-driven approach, whereas a manufacturing plant might prioritize transactional leadership's clarity and routine enforcement. The challenge lies in balancing these approaches appropriately, recognizing the context, and developing leadership competencies that foster motivation, accountability, and ethical conduct (Northouse, 2018).

In conclusion, managerial leadership is a multifaceted discipline that requires awareness of various theories and their applications. Transformational, transactional, and servant leadership each contribute uniquely to organizational success. Leaders who understand these approaches and can adapt their style to their environment are better equipped to motivate their teams, drive change, and promote ethical practices. As organizations evolve in a rapidly changing world, cultivating effective leadership remains vital for sustained success and ethical integrity.

References

• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage.
• Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161-177.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
• Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership Redux. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 463-478.