BUSI 681 Proposed Project Model: Project File Assignment Iss

BUSI 681 Proposed Project Model: Project File Assignment Instructions

Open a new project in Microsoft Project and save it as LastName_Project_Name. Input the entire project as the first task and include overarching information and key deliverables in the Notes section. Establish the project start date, justify this date in the Notes, create a work breakdown structure (WBS) with at least 5 deliverables, and decompose these into 20-25 detailed tasks using hierarchy and coding format. Estimate time durations, justify at least 5 tasks, and include 3 milestones with zero duration. Link tasks with varied relationships, incorporate lag or lead time with justification, assign at least 6 human resources with detailed notes, set wages, and assign resources to tasks (not to summaries or milestones). Address over-allocations appropriately, set a project baseline when all data is accurate, and display the critical path via a network diagram. Save and submit the completed project file in MS Project format.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of effective project management in contemporary organizational contexts demands meticulous planning, scheduling, resource allocation, and monitoring. As part of this comprehensive approach, utilizing project management software such as Microsoft Project enables managers and teams to visualize workflows, identify critical tasks, and allocate resources efficiently. The assignment under discussion provides a structured framework for students to develop a complete project plan, from initial scope definition through to scheduling, resource management, and analysis of project timelines.

Initially, the project begins with establishing a foundation: creating a new MS Project file, inputting the overarching project as the first task, and providing detailed descriptions within the Notes section to contextualize the project’s scope and key deliverables. Establishing a start date requires justification based on project needs and logistical considerations. For example, selecting a start date early in the year, such as January 6, 2023, would allow sufficient time for detailed preparation activities such as procurement and research, which are critical in complex projects like satellite launches.

Creating a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is fundamental to organizing the project scope into manageable units. This involves identifying at least five major deliverables—broad categories that encompass all project work—and further breaking these down into specific tasks or work packages. Each deliverable is represented as a noun (e.g., "Develop Space Exploration Plan") while individual tasks are action-oriented (e.g., "Draft exploration plan"). Hierarchical structuring using indentations clarifies relationships, dependencies, and project flow. Coding tasks with numbering formats such as 1.1, 1.1.1, etc., enhances clarity and tracking.

Estimating task durations is the next step, requiring realistic assessments based on task complexity, resources, and potential constraints. It is essential to justify estimates, especially for critical or uncertain tasks—such as research activities or regulatory approvals—by documenting assumptions or constraints in the Notes section. Milestones mark significant phases or achievements, such as the completion of the planning stage or the launch, and have zero duration. Incorporating at least three milestones helps in monitoring progress and aligning project phases with strategic goals.

Linking tasks establishes dependencies that reflect real-world workflows. This involves using Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, or Finish-to-Finish relationships, with at least two non-default link types (e.g., lag or lead dependencies). For example, adding a lag time between planning approval and the start of implementation can model delays or waiting periods realistically. Justifying these dependencies ensures the schedule mirrors actual project dynamics.

Resource management is integral to project success. Assigning at least six human resources with defined wages allows for cost estimation. Enhancing resource data with descriptive notes—such as reasons for selection, potential scheduling issues, or backup plans—provides insights for risk mitigation. Properly addressing over-allocations involves either rescheduling tasks or adjusting resource assignments, with justifications documented in the Notes section. Once the schedule and resource allocations are finalized, setting a project baseline records the approved plan for performance measurement and tracking.

Visualizing the project's critical path through a network diagram facilitates understanding of the sequence of essential tasks that influence the project completion date. This analysis allows project managers to proactively manage risks, optimize durations, and allocate resources effectively. Finalizing the project plan involves verifying all entries, ensuring resource over-allocations are addressed, and saving the document in MS Project format for submission.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart. John Wiley & Sons.
• Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
• Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. John Wiley & Sons.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Sybex.
• Gido, J., & Clements, J. P. (2014). Successful Project Management. Cengage Learning.