BUSI 690 Rothaermel Exercise 1 Instructions Individual Assig

BUSI 690 Rothaermel Exercise 1 Instructions Individual Assignments Chapter 1 Rothaermel Text

Review the assignment to answer the discussion questions and exercises based on the Rothaermel textbook chapters. Complete each question thoroughly, applying concepts from the chapters, conducting outside research where necessary, and providing well-supported analysis. Submit your assignments via SafeAssign by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 1. The assignment includes answering various discussion questions from chapters 1 to 5, with some questions requiring analysis of external environments, stakeholder influence, competitive advantage, industry competition, the external and internal environment analyses, resource evaluations, and strategic implications.

Paper For Above instruction

The strategic management process is a comprehensive approach that companies employ to formulate and implement strategies that ensure competitive advantage and long-term success. The foundational understanding of this process begins with analyzing the external environment, identifying internal resources and capabilities, and understanding industry dynamics. The Rothaermel textbook provides a structured framework through various discussion questions to facilitate this understanding, which this paper will explore in depth.

Chapter 1 introduces the importance of stakeholder relationships and their influence on strategic decision-making. For instance, Target’s stakeholders—including employees, customers, communities, and suppliers—play pivotal roles in shaping competitive strategies. Employees influence service quality and operational efficiency; customers impact demand and brand reputation; communities can provide social license to operate; and suppliers affect cost structures and product quality. The manager’s decisions during the analysis stage of the AFI (Analyze, Formulate, Implement) framework are significantly affected by stakeholder input, as each stakeholder group provides feedback and insight that guide strategic focus areas. For example, Target might gather customer feedback through surveys or social media to enhance customer experiences or consult suppliers to reduce costs or improve product offerings.

The formulation stage involves using stakeholder insights to differentiate the company or lower costs. For Target, aligning stakeholder interests with strategic choices can result in innovative service offerings or value enhancements that resonate with consumers. The implementation stage requires understanding how stakeholder relationships impact the execution of strategies; for instance, engaging employees in change initiatives or collaborating with suppliers ensures smoother transitions and sustainable advantages.

Moving to broader ethical considerations, the role of corporate leaders extends beyond financial performance. Ethical responsibilities include considering the impact of strategic decisions on society and other stakeholders. For example, Walmart’s approach to community impact involves supporting local businesses or mitigating negative effects caused by increased retail footprints. Similarly, Apple’s responsibility extends to ensuring fair labor practices at manufacturing sites like Foxconn. These considerations demonstrate that strategic decision-making should incorporate social, environmental, and ethical dimensions, which contribute to the firm's reputation and long-term sustainability.

Research indicates that firm-specific factors—such as unique resources—have a more substantial influence on performance than industry-specific effects, termed the ‘firm effects vs. industry effects’. This insight underscores the importance of developing unique resources and capabilities that provide competitive advantages. However, in certain situations, industry effects can overshadow firm effects—for example, in highly regulated or commodity industries where external factors heavily influence profitability.

Scenario planning becomes vital in industries characterized by rapid change or intense competition, such as technology or renewable energy. By anticipating future scenarios—considering technological disruptions, regulatory shifts, or consumer trends—companies can develop flexible strategic responses. For example, tech firms like Apple or Google utilize scenario planning to prepare for breakthroughs in AI or to anticipate regulations impacting data privacy. Some industries benefit more from scenario planning due to their volatility; for instance, the pharmaceutical industry must prepare for patent expirations, regulatory approvals, or market shifts.

Understanding the external environment remains fundamental for organizations, as it enables them to identify opportunities and threats, and adapt proactively. Porter’s Five Forces analysis provides a systematic framework to evaluate industry competitiveness. Weak competitive forces—such as low supplier power or minimal threat of new entrants—can lead to higher profits, whereas strong forces—like intense rivalry or high buyer power—drive down margins.

For example, the airline industry faces stiff competition with high rivalry, significant supplier power over aircraft manufacturers, and high buyer power through price sensitivity. These forces collectively reduce profitability. Conversely, an industry like software development may experience low supplier power and low threat of new entrants, boosting potential gains. Evaluating which force is most influential enables managers to tailor strategies effectively.

Internally, analyzing resources and capabilities through a value chain exercise sheds light on core competencies. McDonald’s exemplifies this through its primary activities—such as operations and marketing—and support activities like procurement and technology. The activities that add the most value include efficient operations and branding efforts, which deliver consistent quality and brand recognition. Cost containment is primarily achieved through streamlined operations, economies of scale, and supply chain management.

Recent innovations at McDonald’s, including healthier menu options and enhanced dining experiences, have required modifications to its traditional value chain activities. For example, sourcing organic ingredients or upgrading restaurant interiors impacts procurement and operations. These changes serve to meet evolving customer preferences, aligning with the company’s strategic shift towards health-conscious offerings, thereby redefining value creation in the chain.

The resource-based view (RBV) emphasizes that sustainable competitive advantages stem from valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable resources and capabilities. These are often interdependent; for instance, a brand reputation (a resource) can enhance customer loyalty, which in turn boosts market share. Recognizing interdependence implies that managers must develop integrated resources to maintain competitive edges, rather than relying on isolated capabilities.

Finally, understanding customer perceptions and defining target segments—such as students or corporate clients—are crucial for strategic positioning. By analyzing how customers view the company, managers can tailor marketing and operational strategies to better meet needs, foster loyalty, and differentiate from competitors.

In conclusion, strategic management requires an integrated approach that considers external factors, stakeholder influences, industry dynamics, internal resources, and customer perceptions. The Rothaermel textbook provides valuable frameworks and tools—such as Porter’s Five Forces, value chain analysis, and RBV—that enable managers to craft strategies for sustained competitive advantage. Applying these concepts thoughtfully ensures organizations are better prepared to navigate complex environments and achieve long-term success.

References

• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.
• Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary Strategy Analysis (10th ed.). Wiley.
• Rothaermel, F. T. (2023). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
• Barney, J. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Prentice Hall.
• Chen, M. J. (1996). Resources, constraints, and strategy: A resource-based approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 119-129.
• Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D, patents, and capabilities among small manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(6), 678-693.
• Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue Ocean Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 76-84.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. Cengage Learning.