Business Problem Solving Case: New Technology At UPS Clashes

Business Problem Solving Casenew Technology At Ups Clashes With Outdat

Business Problem-solving Case New Technology at UPS Clashes with Outdated Ways of Working This chapter’s Interactive Session on Technology described how UPS investments in information technology are helping it remain competitive in the package delivery market. Unfortunately, UPS has not been as competitive as it could be because critical aspects of its operations have been saddled with outdated technology and manual procedures. Although much of UPS’s IT infrastructure is leading-edge, not all of it is. UPS moves millions of packages each day using 80,000 drivers. Until recently, about half were processed through automated facilities, the rest being handled using 30-year-old equipment and manual processes.

For example, in UPS’s Mesquite, Texas, package-sorting facility, a 30-year-old analog control panel the size of a chest freezer with rows of red and green lights informs workers when something on the facility’s web of conveyor belts goes awry. The sorting process begins with boxes being unloaded from trucks onto conveyor belts. A worker is required to align each box so that a scanner can read the delivery label on the front, top, or one side. The packages move inside to a line of about 50 workers. There are nine conveyor belts, three along the ground, three waist-high, and three directly overhead.

A human sorter picks a package, quickly deciphers the label, and then places the package onto the correct belt. A worker around the corner sorts packages down chutes, where loaders fill truck trailers. In an automated facility scanners would read a package’s destination and use equipment called shoe pucks to push packages down the proper chute. At an older less-automated facility such as Mesquite, a medium-sized package receives four “touches,” with each “touch” representing an act of handling. Each “touch” increases the chance of a sorting error or damage to the package.

Mesquite processes about 40,000 pieces per hour, so even rare human mistakes add up. Missorted packages can add an extra day to a UPS delivery, degrading customer service and adding to operating costs. All FedEx ground hubs, such as the facility in Edison, New Jersey, are automated. There, FedEx workers “touch” most packages only twice, for unloading and loading only. Amazon operations likewise are heavily automated, especially its warehouses, which feature driverless forklifts and robots that bring shelves to workers.

About 30 miles from Mesquite, UPS’s Fort Worth facility illustrates UPS’s efforts to catch up. There, boxes are scanned, sorted by destination, and sent to outbound vehicles via machines. With six-sided scanners, employees do not need to worry about which side is up. UPS employees in an air-conditioned control room view a wall of flat-screen monitors displaying live video feeds. The computer detects jams and other malfunctions, and workers can reroute where the conveyors send packages.

There is no human element in rerouting a package in the Fort Worth building. A few workers walk alongside the belts to replace any package that falls off, which rarely happens anymore. Directing the sorting network is software that helps manage package flows, including those between automated facilities and older ones. The technology can divert additional packages destined for areas overwhelmed by volume. This automated 750-worker facility can process the same number of packages daily as can Mesquite with 1,170 workers.

Automation has increased the accuracy of the sorting, and also generates data to help the company optimize delivery routes using fewer miles, less fuel, and less equipment and also provide better forecasts of shipping volume. In contrast, 96 percent of competitor FedEx’s ground packages move through automated sites. FedEx discarded outdated equipment and manual processes years ago, and new rival Amazon.com never had to deal with outdated systems at all. UPS initially applied a “band-aid” approach to dealing with surging e-commerce shipments. It would add extra shifts, extend working hours, or retrofit parts of older buildings with new equipment.

But UPS management knows it has to rectify this situation to remain competitive in the twenty-first century, and be able to handle the new distribution requirements posed by e-commerce. The company plans to invest $20 billion between 2019 and 2022 to adequately meet twenty-first-century shopping and shipping trends. Much of this investment will be directed toward new automated shipping and warehousing facilities, including seven “super hubs” which can sort packages 30 percent more efficiently than standard facilities.

In the past, most of the shipments handled by UPS went to retailers and business corporations. Today, more and more of these shipments are destined for individual households who have purchased an item or two online using the Internet. UPS now delivers more than 50 percent of the packages it handles to homes. Numerous deliveries to far-flung suburban homes are more costly to UPS than delivering and picking up multiple packages at large businesses or offices.

Although some of UPS’s management worried about so much company business going toward lower-margin deliveries, the company knew it had to embrace e-commerce. According to UPS spokesperson Steve Gant, there is “tremendous opportunity” in delivering e-commerce orders even amidst formidable competitors who at the moment appear to be more technologically and organizationally advanced. UPS plans to process all packages, with the exception of some large ones that travel short distances, through automated hubs by 2022.

Trying to use outdated shipping technology and procedures in the new e-commerce environment had caused UPS to lose business. Bottlenecks from being overwhelmed at times by online orders created delays that drove some health care, industrial, and other corporate customers to switch to FedEx. Amazon is creating its own delivery network of trucks, vans, and planes to handle most of its online orders, especially in cities and suburbs. Since Amazon accounts for as much as 10 percent of UPS’s revenue and an even higher share of shipping volume, UPS will definitely be affected.

UPS is unionized, with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters representing 260,000 drivers, sorters, and other workers, opposed to automation that might replace jobs. The union has opposed technologies such as drones and self-driving vehicles, and fears that automation can eliminate jobs. FedEx’s ground-operation workers are not unionized, which has influenced its ability to implement new technology more rapidly without union resistance.

Despite these challenges, UPS is investing heavily in automation, including retrofitting old facilities and opening new automated centers, which sometimes creates new jobs rather than eliminates existing ones. For example, a new automated hub in Houston created 575 jobs. In contrast, FedEx has been consolidating and closing certain hubs to streamline its network, such as the FedEx Indianapolis hub.

Additionally, UPS has adopted new technological solutions such as Bluetooth beacons inside delivery trucks to prevent misloads, improve delivery accuracy, and enhance customer notifications. By implementing real-time data-tracking and hand-held devices for seasonal workers, UPS has optimized staffing and workflow, especially during peak seasons. These technological upgrades have enhanced efficiency and prepared UPS to handle increased volumes during peak periods like the holiday season.

Overall, technological integration and automation are key strategies for UPS to overcome its outdated processes, improve operational efficiency, and stay competitive within a rapidly evolving logistics and e-commerce landscape. The significant technological investments indicate a strategic shift toward modernization, despite union resistance, to meet future demands and maintain market share.

Paper For Above instruction

Abstract

This paper examines the critical technological upgrades at UPS amidst outdated operational systems, analyzing how these changes impact efficiency, competitiveness, and labor relations. The integration of automation, data analytics, and real-time tracking exemplifies strategic responses to the dynamic e-commerce environment. The analysis highlights the challenges posed by union resistance and the importance of technological innovation in maintaining market relevance amid fierce competition from FedEx and Amazon. The paper concludes with recommendations for sustainable technological adaptation and labor-management strategies to optimize operations and foster future growth.

Introduction

The logistics industry is characterized by rapid technological evolution driven by increasing e-commerce demands. UPS, a global leader in parcel delivery, faces the challenge of modernizing its extensive operations to stay competitive against agile rivals like FedEx and Amazon. Despite significant investments, much of UPS’s infrastructure remains outdated, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. This paper explores the pressing issues faced by UPS, the technological strategies it has adopted to overcome these obstacles, and the implications of these developments on organizational and labor dynamics. The aim is to provide a comprehensive case analysis of how technological renewal can reshape operational excellence and competitive positioning.

The Problem Faced by UPS

UPS’s primary problem lies in its reliance on outdated processing equipment and manual procedures at key facilities, which impairs operational efficiency and customer service. Specifically, the use of 30-year-old analog control panels and manual sorting processes result in higher error rates, increased handling times, and operational bottlenecks, especially during peak demand periods. These inefficiencies are compounded by the company’s struggle to adapt swiftly to the surge in e-commerce shipments that require rapid, automated sorting and delivery. Additionally, resistance from unionized workers who oppose automation technologies poses a significant organizational challenge, hindering swift modernization efforts. The outdated infrastructure not only hampers UPS’s operational agility but also threatens its competitive edge in a highly dynamic market where speed, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness are paramount.

From a management perspective, the inability to fully modernize due to labor opposition, coupled with the high costs of retrofitting old facilities, has resulted in a “band-aid” approach that fails to address core systemic inefficiencies. This situation worsens the risk of losing market share to competitors like FedEx, which employs fully automated facilities, and Amazon, which has its proprietary logistics network. The problem is multidimensional, involving operational inefficiencies, technological lag, strategic challenges, and labor-management tensions, all of which undermine the firm’s capacity to meet customer expectations and adapt to future market trends.

The Solution Pursued by UPS

UPS’s response to its operational challenges has involved substantial capital investment in new automation infrastructure and technological solutions. Between 2019 and 2022, UPS allocated $20 billion toward modernizing its facilities, including the development of seven “super hubs” with increased sorting capacity and efficiency. These state-of-the-art centers utilize advanced automated sorting equipment, integrated data systems, and real-time monitoring to significantly reduce processing times, errors, and labor costs. Furthermore, UPS has employed innovative technologies such as Bluetooth beacons within trucks, real-time tracking, and worker hand-held devices to enhance accuracy, efficiency, and customer communication.

The strategic focus on automation aims to streamline operations, reduce “touches” per package, and facilitate rapid response to fluctuating e-commerce volumes. These measures help UPS handle surges during peak seasons like holidays more effectively. Additionally, by modernizing existing facilities and opening new automated centers, UPS seeks to balance labor costs with technological gains, and shift from manual to automated workflows. The adoption of these technologies also supports better decision-making through data analytics, enabling route optimization, workload management, and improved service reliability.

While these investments have shown promising results—increased processing speed, accuracy, and significant cost savings—they also encounter resistance from the unionized workforce. Union leaders oppose automation that could eliminate jobs, creating friction that must be managed carefully. UPS’s approach emphasizes not only technological upgrades but also the creation of new jobs in automated facilities, highlighting a strategic balancing act between modernization and labor relations. Overall, the solution aims to transform UPS’s operational landscape into a more agile, efficient, and competitive network capable of thriving in the digital, fast-paced e-commerce era.

Diagram of the Sorting Process Before and After Automation

Before Automation

• Package unloading from trucks
• Manual alignment by workers for scanning
• Human sorters read labels and place packages on conveyor belts
• Packages are sorted down chutes manually
• Loaders fill trailers with sorted packages

After Automation

• Packages are automatically scanned via advanced multi-sided scanners
• Conveyor belts are managed by computerized sorting systems
• Shoe puck sorting mechanisms direct packages to correct chutes automatically
• Real-time monitoring detects jams and malfunctions
• Package flows are optimized via software managing automated and manual processes

Impact of Automation on Operations and Decision-Making

The automation of packaging and sorting at UPS has profoundly transformed operational workflows and managerial decision-making. Firstly, automation reduces the number of touches per package—from around four touches at older facilities to nearly two at automated centers—minimizing handling errors and damages. The improved accuracy directly enhances customer satisfaction through improved delivery reliability and transparency, facilitated by real-time tracking and notifications. Additionally, automated facilities can process higher volumes more rapidly, enabling UPS to meet surging e-commerce demands efficiently and cost-effectively.

Data-driven decision-making has become central to UPS operations post-automation. With technologies like Bluetooth beacons and real-time analytics on mobile devices, managers can monitor package flows, workforce productivity, and equipment status instantaneously. This immediate access improves shift planning, resource allocation, and rerouting strategies during overloads or disruptions. The ability to analyze package volume trends allows UPS to forecast shipment loads accurately, optimize routes, and reduce fuel consumption and delivery times, thus lowering operational costs and environmental impact.

Furthermore, automation facilitates strategic network adjustments, such as opening new hubs or shedding underutilized facilities, enhancing logistic flexibility. These technological upgrades support continuous improvement initiatives, fostering a culture of innovation essential for competing against FedEx and Amazon’s highly automated systems. Consequently, automation not only streamlines workflow but also empowers managerial decision-making with high-quality, real-time data that enhances operational resilience and competitiveness in a complex marketplace.

Conclusion

UPS’s longstanding reliance on outdated technology posed significant operational and competitive challenges. By investing heavily in automation and innovative technological solutions, UPS aims to modernize its vast logistics network, improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance customer service. While resistance from unionized workers presents a hurdle, strategic investments in automation are creating new employment opportunities and fostering a more agile operational environment. The integration of real-time data, advanced sorting machinery, and intelligent route management positions UPS to better meet the demands of the evolving e-commerce landscape. Ultimately, technological renewal is essential for UPS to sustain its market leadership and adapt to future logistics challenges, demonstrating the importance of continuous innovation in a highly competitive industry.

References

• Bloomberg. (2019). UPS Sees Payoff from $20BN Tech Bet. SupplyChainBrain.
• Feser, K. (2019). UPS Package Delivery Facility in NW Houston Creates 575 Jobs. Chron.
• International Brotherhood of Teamsters. (2021). Union Opposition to Automation Technologies.
• Kepadia, S. (2018). Company of the Year: UPS. Supply Chain Dive.
• Woyke, E. (2018). How UPS Delivers Faster Using $8 Headphones and Code That Decides When Dirty Trucks Get Cleaned. MIT Technology Review.
• Ziobro, P. (2018). UPS’s $20 Billion Problem: Operations Stuck in the Twentieth Century. Wall Street Journal.
• Sherman, R., & Christopher, M. (2018). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Pearson.
• Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management. Pearson.
• Higginson, J., & Holweg, M. (2017). The Future of Logistics. Harvard Business Review.
• Choi, T.M., & Linton, T. (2019). A Review of Supply Chain Management Strategies and Technologies. International Journal of Production Economics.