Buying A House: Imagine You Are A Public Administrator

Buying A Houseimagine You Are A Public Administrator Who Has Just Been

Imagine you are a public administrator who has just been promoted to a higher position but must relocate to another city and purchase a different home. Using the five distributing bargaining skills, present the steps and various aspects you would consider implementing in buying a house. The five Distributive Bargaining Negotiation Skills are: Distributive Bargaining, Reservation Price, Bracketing, Norms and Framing. Be sure to address the following: 1. Analyze the bargaining situation and whether or not it is distributive. If so, determine the reservation price. 2. Present the initial offer you would make and apply bracketing to achieve your target price of $310,000. 3. Indicate and frame the norms you would utilize in presenting your initial offer.

Paper For Above instruction

In the scenario of purchasing a house as a public administrator facing a relocation for a higher position, the negotiation process closely resembles a classic distributive bargaining situation. Distributive bargaining involves a win-lose approach where parties compete over a fixed resource—in this case, the price of the house. Recognizing whether the negotiation is primarily distributive is crucial because it influences the strategies employed, especially regarding influence tactics such as framing offers, understanding reservation prices, and applying bracketing techniques.

Analyzing the Bargaining Situation

The transaction of buying a house typically presents a distributive bargaining scenario because both the buyer and seller aim to maximize their respective outcomes—buyers seek the lowest possible price, while sellers aim for the highest. The limited resource here is the price, which is fixed and finite, particularly since real estate markets tend to be competitive and constrained by market value. Given the stakes, the negotiation is mostly distributive, with each party attempting to secure optimal terms within a defined boundary—that is, the maximum they are willing to pay or accept.

Determining the Reservation Price

The reservation price refers to the highest price a buyer is willing to pay or the lowest a seller is willing to accept. For the buyer, the reservation price depends on factors such as market conditions, the property’s appraisal value, financial limits, and personal value attached to the specific home. In this scenario, assuming the market data and the buyer’s budget constraints, the reservation price might be set at $330,000—above the target price but below where the buyer perceives diminishing returns or financial strain. This reservation price serves as the walking-away point, beyond which further negotiations would not be advantageous.

Initial Offer and Bracketing Strategy

To strategically approach the negotiation and reach the target price of $310,000, I would initiate the offer below this figure, perhaps at $290,000. This initial offer creates room for upward movement, allowing the use of bracketing—an effective negotiation tactic to narrow the target price. The seller's counteroffer could then be expected within this range, and I would gradually increase my offers—say, to $300,000, then to $305,000—until I reach the point close to my target. This method allows me to test the seller’s true reservation price while maintaining control over the negotiation flow, steadily converging toward $310,000.

Framing Norms and Establishing the Initial Offer

Norms in negotiation serve as unwritten rules that guide behavior and set expectations. In presenting my initial offer, I would utilize norms such as fairness and aspiration. I would frame my initial offer as reasonable and based on recent comparable sales in the neighborhood, which aligns with typical market norms. For example, I might state, "Based on recent sales data, I believe an offer around $290,000 reflects the current market value and the condition of the property." Such framing emphasizes fairness and aligns with the normative standards of transparency and market-appropriate pricing, setting a constructive tone for negotiation.

Additionally, framing the offer as part of a collaborative effort to reach a mutually beneficial deal may invoke norms of reciprocity and goodwill. For instance, I could mention my intent to close the deal swiftly, which may appeal to the seller's desire for certainty and efficiency.

Integrating the Five Skills for Effective Negotiation

Effective use of the five distributive bargaining skills entails recognizing the negotiation as distributive, establishing a clear reservation price, employing bracketing to navigate toward the target price, and framing offers within socially accepted norms. Combining these skills enhances the likelihood of achieving favorable outcomes, particularly when dealing with high-stakes transactions like real estate.

Conclusion

In conclusion, purchasing a house in this scenario involves a calculated approach rooted in distributive bargaining principles. By analyzing the negotiation environment, determining reservation prices, strategically bracketing offers, and framing proposals within acceptable norms, the buyer can optimize their outcome while maintaining a cooperative bargaining process. These skills, grounded in established negotiation theory, provide valuable tools for managing complex and competitive transactions efficiently and ethically.

References

• Carrell, M. R., & Heavrin, C. (2014). Negotiating Essentials: Theory, Skills, and Practices. Pearson.
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• Shell, G. R. (2006). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Penguin.
• Thompson, L. (2014). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Pearson.
• Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Raiffa, H. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press.
• Shell, G. R. (2001). Making the most of concession strategies and tactics. Negotiation Journal, 17(4), 365–370.
• Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
• Thompson, L. (2018). Making the Group Decision-Making Process More Effective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 147, 1-10.
• Rubin, J. Z., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1984). Distortions in negotiator perceptions as a determinant of bargaining power. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(2), 200–219.