California Southern University Graduate Case Study Format

California Southern University Graduate Case Study Format Introduction

Case learning is a method of applying theory to sound practical real-world applications. Each selected case provides a description of a problem situation taken from a specific company and documented into the case to address specific international concepts and constructs. The purpose of each case is to augment the course content with applications that enable the CalSouthern learner to apply text materials to a problem and solve that application problem using learner-selected methods and procedures.

There are no exact answers or perfect solutions to a case problem. Each recommended solution and justification can and is usually different amongst a group of respondents. The solution must fit the case and must be vigorously supported. The problem statement, analysis, selected solution, and especially the justification of the selected solution are all critical elements in the case method. There are no shortcuts to case presentations, but a formalized methodology enables the case presenter to solve the case problem effectively.

The format begins with an introduction of the case problem, requiring a succinct problem statement and scope definition with a concise summary of the critical decision issues—no more than 100 words. The analysis section should thoroughly review the critical elements and provide a clear set of facts highlighting essential issues—approximately 300 words. The solution section presents the recommended course of action, correlates with the analysis, and cites specific text materials—limited to 300 words. The justification explains why the chosen solution is correct, supportive, and suitable for the case, in bullet-point format, not exceeding 200 words. A concluding summary of about 100 words encapsulates the key points of problem analysis, proposed solutions, and their justification.

Paper For Above instruction

The case study methodology is instrumental in bridging theoretical knowledge with real-world business practice. It encourages critical thinking, problem-solving, and strategic decision-making by analyzing actual cases extracted from business environments. Followed rigorously, the structure enhances clarity and coherence in presenting findings and recommendations.

The initial step involves crafting a precise problem statement and scope description, ideally in under 100 words. This clarity sets the foundation for subsequent analysis. The analysis phase demands a meticulous review of the case’s critical factors, emphasizing relevant facts, sequence of events, and core issues, crafted into approximately 300 words. This step equips the analyst with a comprehensive understanding necessary for informed decision-making.

Developing an effective solution involves proposing an actionable plan aligned with the analysis insights. The solution must be concise, evidence-based, and well-supported, referencing specific textual or empirical data. Limiting this section to 300 words ensures focus and relevance. It also demonstrates the connection between analysis and remedial steps. Proper citation of sources fortifies credibility and demonstrates integration with academic or industry literature.

The justification segment is pivotal in convincing stakeholders of the validity and robustness of the recommended actions. Bullet points are an effective format, succinctly listing reasons that underpin the suitability of the solution. This section should remain within 200 words, offering persuasive arguments grounded in analytical reasoning and evidence.

Finally, the summary encapsulates the entire case discussion—problem, solution, and justification—in roughly 100 words. This conclusion reinforces the pivotal insights and decisions derived from the case analysis, ensuring clarity and focus.

Adopting the recommended methodological steps and structured format elevates the effectiveness of case study analysis. This approach not only fosters analytical rigor but also encourages integration of personal and organizational experiences, resulting in practical, innovative, and well-justified solutions suitable for complex business environments.

References

• Harvard Business Review. (2018). How to Analyze a Business Case. Harvard Business School Publishing.
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Miller, D., & Le Breton, M. (2019). Strategic Business Decision-Making. Journal of Business Strategies, 35(2), 45-62.
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Choi, S., & Lee, H. (2014). Strategic Analysis of Business Cases. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(2), 112-125.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications.
• Stake, R. E. (1998). Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Sage Publications.
• Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.