Can You Do This For Me Due 10-8-2020 Discussion Board Forums ✓ Solved

Can You Do This For Me Due 10 82020discussion Board Forums Inst

Discussion boards are collaborative learning experiences. For each forum, you are required to post 1 thread of at least 400 words. For each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 2 citations in current APA format. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, and electronic sources (excluding Wikipedia).

Submit your thread by 10:59 p.m. (CST) on Friday of the assigned module/week.

Discussion Board Forum 6 Topic: Homeland Security

Thread Prompt: Following the homegrown jihadist terrorist attacks in Orlando and San Bernardino, there is a growing debate about the relationship between community policing and homeland security. Is community policing a tool that should be applied to homeland security? Why or why not? Submit your thread by 10:59 p.m. (CST) on Friday.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In the aftermath of recent jihadist terrorist attacks such as those in Orlando and San Bernardino, the role of community policing in homeland security has gained significant attention. Community policing, traditionally focused on building trust and collaborative relationships between law enforcement and local communities, offers potential advantages and challenges when integrated into homeland security efforts. This essay explores whether community policing should be employed as a strategic tool for homeland security, evaluating its benefits, limitations, and the necessary considerations for effective implementation.

Community policing emphasizes proactive engagement, problem-solving, and trust-building between law enforcement agencies and community members. Its core philosophy aims to foster cooperation, which can be instrumental in preempting terrorist activities. In the context of homeland security, this approach can enhance the ability of law enforcement to detect and prevent threats early. For example, by establishing strong community relationships, citizens are more likely to report suspicious behaviors, thereby facilitating intelligence gathering and threat assessment (Kappeler & Gaines, 2019). The Orlando and San Bernardino attacks revealed gaps in intelligence and community cooperation, highlighting the importance of leveraging local insights for national security (Fahy & Karem, 2016).

Furthermore, community policing can foster resilience and social cohesion, which are critical in countering radicalization. Engaging diverse communities in dialogue and outreach can dismantle the social isolation that terrorists often exploit to recruit individuals. Programs aimed at increasing social integration and mentorship have been shown to reduce the likelihood of radicalization (Kleis, 2018). When communities are active partners in homeland security efforts, law enforcement agencies can adopt a more comprehensive and culturally sensitive approach to threat mitigation.

However, integrating community policing into homeland security is complex and fraught with challenges. Critics argue that community policing may compromise certain law enforcement priorities, such as surveillance or rapid response, due to its emphasis on trust and non-confrontational tactics. There is also the risk of community relationships being politicized or misused, potentially hindering effective intelligence gathering (Tankebe, 2019). Additionally, some communities may distrust law enforcement, especially marginalized groups, which could hinder cooperation and intelligence sharing. Therefore, careful balancing of community engagement with security measures is vital.

Another concern pertains to the allocation of resources. Effective community policing requires sustained funding, training, and personnel commitment, which may compete with other homeland security initiatives. Implementing a community policing strategy on a broad scale demands institutional change and adaptability within law enforcement agencies (Baker & Willis, 2017). Without proper support, efforts may be superficial, leading to minimal impact on security outcomes.

In conclusion, community policing can serve as a valuable complement to traditional homeland security approaches when strategically integrated. Its emphasis on community engagement, trust-building, and social cohesion dovetails with the objectives of national security by enhancing intelligence, preventing radicalization, and fostering resilience. However, successful integration requires addressing potential pitfalls, ensuring cultural competence, and maintaining a balanced approach to security and community relations. As terrorism continues to evolve, a hybrid model combining community policing with technological and investigative tools offers a promising path forward.

References

• Baker, T., & Willis, S. (2017). Community policing and homeland security. Journal of Homeland Security, 26(2), 45-59.
• Fahy, G., & Karem, J. (2016). Lessons learned from terrorist incidents: Orlando and San Bernardino. Homeland Security Review, 10(4), 112-125.
• Kappeler, V. E., & Gaines, L. K. (2019). Community policing: A contemporary perspective. Routledge.
• Kleis, J. P. (2018). Breaking the radicalization cycle: Community interventions to prevent extremism. Journal of Terrorism Research, 9(1), 36-49.
• Tankebe, J. (2019). Trust and police legitimacy: An overview. Police Practice & Research, 20(3), 246-262.