Can You Do This For Me Due October 9, 2020? Post 2 Replies ✓ Solved

Can You Do This For Me Due 10092020you Must Post 2 Replies Of At Lea

Can You Do This For Me Due 10092020you Must Post 2 Replies Of At Lea

CAN YOU DO THIS FOR ME DUE 10/09/2020 You must post 2 replies of at least 200 words each to other classmates' threads. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 citation. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, and electronic sources (excluding Wikipedia). Submit your replies by 10:59 p.m. (CST) on Monday of the assigned module/week.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Community policing plays a pivotal role in the prevention of terrorism, particularly in combating homegrown terrorism, by fostering collaboration between law enforcement and local communities. The core idea revolves around local residents being vigilant and proactive in reporting suspicious activities, which are often overlooked or dismissed by outsiders or authorities lacking intimate knowledge of the community's nuances. As Dziama (2016) emphasizes, community policing involves problem-solving partnerships that build trust and leverage local insights to enhance public safety. This approach is especially critical when identifying behavioral changes indicative of radicalization or planning of terrorist acts, such as unusual purchasing habits or social media activity.

Historically, the 1990s marked the widespread adoption of community policing strategies across the United States, driven by the recognition that local community engagement is essential in counter-terrorism efforts (Schanzer, 2016). Recent initiatives like the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program exemplify how governmental efforts aim to mobilize citizens to serve as a first line of defense against domestic terror threats. However, as Wyckoff (2020) notes, these programs often face community distrust, stemming from perceived infringement on civil liberties and cultural insensitivity, which impedes their effectiveness.

Effective community policing necessitates continuous engagement, trust-building, and safeguarding measures. Incorporating technology such as surveillance cameras and community alerts is beneficial, but these should augment, not replace, personal relationships and community involvement. For instance, neighborhood watch programs enable residents to pool resources and information, fostering a collective responsibility for safety. Additionally, involving professionals from allied disciplines such as legal experts or mental health professionals can facilitate nuanced assessments of suspicious behaviors, which can be vital in preventing radicalization from escalating.

Nevertheless, challenges persist. Domestic terrorism, sometimes perpetrated by individuals or groups within the community, complicates policing efforts. This infiltrates trust and could potentially turn community programs into vectors for espionage or sabotage, especially if malicious actors embed themselves undetected. Therefore, rigorous background checks, ongoing training, and clear protocols are essential in enabling volunteers and officers to discern and respond appropriately to threats (Wyckoff, 2020).

Furthermore, the tense socio-political climate and mistrust of law enforcement complicate community engagement. It is crucial for agencies to foster transparent communication and demonstrate a commitment to protecting civil liberties. As Psalm 118:8 states, “It is better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust in man,” highlighting the importance of spiritual resilience and wisdom amid perilous times.

In conclusion, community policing represents a vital component of counter-terrorism strategies, especially in addressing homegrown threats. The collaboration between law enforcement and communities, strengthened through trust, technology, and professional oversight, can significantly reduce the likelihood of successful terrorist acts. Building resilient, vigilant communities requires ongoing effort, faith, and mutual understanding, acknowledging that local residents often hold the key to early detection and intervention.

References

• Schanzer, D. (2016). The challenge and promise of using community policing strategies to prevent violent extremism: A call for community partnerships with law enforcement to enhance public safety. U.S. Department of Justice.
• Wyckoff, R. (2020). Terrorism prevention through community engagement and counter-radicalization programs. Naval Postgraduate School.
• Reina, M. (2019). Counter-terrorism strategies and community involvement. Journal of Homeland Security Studies, 15(4), 55-75.
• United States Department of Justice. (2016). Community policing definition and strategies. DOJ.gov.
• Schmid, A. (2014). The threat of domestic extremism: Strategies for prevention. Journal of Security Studies, 28(2), 112-130.
• Mitchell, K., & Roberts, J. (2018). Technology and community policing: Enhancing local safety. Security Journal, 31(3), 567-583.
• Johnson, L. (2017). Building trust in multicultural communities for effective policing. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 19(2), 123-135.
• Smith, R. (2015). The role of community engagement in counterterrorism. Journal of Community Safety and Security, 5(1), 22-34.
• Higgins, T. (2020). Civil liberties and counter-terrorism: Balancing security and rights. Security Studies, 29(4), 645-666.
• Brown, P. (2019). Faith and resilience in community policing. Faith and Society, 7(2), 89-102.