Capital Budgeting Techniques As A Financial Consultant You H

Capital Budgeting Techniquesas A Financial Consultant You Have Contra

As a financial consultant, you have been engaged by Wheel Industries to evaluate their procedures for selecting long-term investment projects. Your task involves analyzing the company's capital budgeting processes by applying several financial techniques, including calculating the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), estimating project cash flows, and assessing project viability through methods such as Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Furthermore, you are required to incorporate risk considerations into your evaluations for two specific projects, and provide comprehensive explanations of your methodology, findings, and recommendations in an 8-10 page detailed report.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Capital budgeting is a fundamental process that assists firms in evaluating and selecting long-term investment projects. Effective capital budgeting techniques ensure that resources are allocated efficiently, maximizing shareholder value. As a consultant, utilizing a combination of financial tools such as WACC, NPV, IRR, and risk analysis is essential for informed decision-making. This paper explores these methods in the context of Wheel Industries' expansion project and additional potential investments, providing a comprehensive assessment of their financial viability.

Company Overview and Project Description

Wheel Industries is contemplating a three-year expansion project, termed Project A, involving an initial investment of $1.5 million. The project expects to generate annual revenues of $1.2 million and incur operating costs of $600,000, with no salvage value at the end of its lifespan. Using straight-line depreciation, the project's cash flow implications are analyzed to determine its financial attractiveness through NPV and IRR calculations.

Cost of Capital Components

Cost of Equity

To calculate the cost of new equity for Wheel Industries, the dividend growth model (Gordon Growth Model) is employed. The company's recent dividend payment was $2.50 per share, with dividends expected to grow at a constant rate of 6% annually. The current stock price is $50 per share, but issuing new shares incurs a 10% flotation cost. The formula used is:

C_e = [(D₁ / P₀) + g] / (1 - F)

where D₁ is the dividend next year, P₀ is the current stock price, g is the growth rate, and F is flotation cost.

After plugging in the values: D₁ = $2.50 × 1.06 = $2.65, P₀ = $50, g = 6%, F = 10%, the cost of new equity is calculated to be approximately 13.1%.

Advantages of using equity financing include no obligation to direct payments, potentially lower financial distress costs, and signaling positive growth prospects. Disadvantages involve increased dilution of ownership and higher costs compared to debt due to equity’s higher risk premium (Miller & Modigliani, 1961).

Cost of Debt

The firm's appropriate debt cost is based on the market rate of 5%, adjusted for taxes to reflect the tax shield benefit. The after-tax cost of debt is calculated as:

R_d = Market rate × (1 - Tax rate) = 5% × (1 - 0.35) = 3.25%

Advantages include tax deductibility of interest, lower cost relative to equity, and established credibility. Disadvantages encompass increased financial risk and potential constraints if debt levels become too high (Frank & Goyal, 2003).

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

The firm's capital structure comprises 30% debt and 70% equity. Using the component costs, the WACC is computed as:

WACC = (E/V) × C_e + (D/V) × R_d × (1 - Tax rate)

where E/V = 0.70, D/V = 0.30, C_e ≈ 13.1%, R_d = 3.25%. Substituting the values results in a WACC of approximately 9.1%. This rate serves as the discount rate for project evaluation, reflecting the firm's average cost of capital weighted appropriately by capital structure (Brealey, Myers, & Allen, 2017).

Cash Flow Estimation and Project Valuation

Annual Cash Flows and Calculations

The project’s annual after-tax operating cash flows are determined by calculating EBIT, subtracting taxes, adding back depreciation, and adjusting for non-cash expenses. Operating revenue is $1.2 million, with costs of $600,000, leading to an EBIT of $600,000. Taxes are 35%, therefore taxes amount to $210,000, and net income is $390,000. Since depreciation is $1.5 million / 3 years = $500,000 annually, adding back depreciation yields an annual cash flow of:

Cash Flow = Net Income + Depreciation = $390,000 + $500,000 = $890,000

Adjustments for initial investment, tax shields, and working capital are also considered for detailed cash flow analysis. For simplicity, the calculations assume no change in working capital and salvage value at the end of three years is zero.

Net Present Value Calculation

At a discount rate of 6%, the NPV is calculated as:

NPV = ∑ (Cash flows / (1 + r)^t) - Initial investment

Applying the values over three years, the NPV is approximately $1.01 million, indicating a highly profitable project (Ross, Westerfield, Jaffe, 2016). Given the positive NPV, the project is economically acceptable.

Internal Rate of Return

The IRR is the discount rate that equates the present value of cash inflows to the initial investment. Calculations show that the IRR exceeds 6%, approximately 25%, reinforcing the project's viability. Such a high IRR suggests that the project provides substantial returns above the hurdle rate, making it investment-worthy (Damodaran, 2010).

Risk Incorporation and Project Selection

Mutually Exclusive Projects and Expected Cash Flows

Wheel Industries also considers two other projects, each costing $120,000 with 6-year lifespans. The expected cash flows are uncertain, modeled via probabilities:

• Project B: Probabilities of $20,000 (25%), $32,000 (50%), and $40,000 (25%)
• Project C: Probabilities of $22,000 (30%), $40,000 (50%), and $50,000 (20%)

The expected annual cash flows are calculated as the weighted average:

For Project B: (0.25 × 20,000) + (0.50 × 32,000) + (0.25 × 40,000) = $30,600

For Project C: (0.30 × 22,000) + (0.50 × 40,000) + (0.20 × 50,000) = $36,200

Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates and NPVs

Using an 8% discount rate that accounts for project risk, the risk-adjusted NPVs for both projects are computed, revealing whether they add value. Analysis shows Project C, with higher expected cash flows, offers a positive NPV, indicating a better investment compared to Project B, which may have a lower or negative NPV depending on the precise cash flow distributions.

Conflict Between IRR and NPV

While both metrics generally align for independent projects, conflicts may arise in mutually exclusive decisions. For instance, a project with a higher IRR might have a lower NPV if it requires higher investments or involves different timing of cash flows. These conflicts occur because IRR assumes reinvestment at the same rate and does not consider scale, whereas NPV measures absolute value addition (Kelley & Lai, 2007).

Conclusion

In conclusion, capital budgeting requires a comprehensive analysis integrating cost of capital, project cash flows, and risk factors. The evaluation of Wheel Industries' Project A indicates viability through positive NPV and high IRR. For alternative projects, expected value analysis combined with risk adjustments provides sound decision criteria. Overall, using a mix of NPV, IRR, and risk considerations ensures effective capital allocation aligned with shareholder value maximization.

References

• Brealey, R., Myers, S., & Allen, F. (2017). Principles of Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Damodaran, A. (2010). Applied Corporate Finance: A User’s Manual. Wiley.
• Frank, M., & Goyal, V. (2003). Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 217–248.
• Kelley, L. G., & Lai, S. (2007). Capital Budgeting Decisions: The Case for NPV. Financial Management, 36(4), 45–56.
• Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares. Journal of Business, 34(4), 411–433.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2016). Corporate Finance (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.