Capstone Ethical Case Analysis: Recognizing Professionals

Capstone Ethical Case Analysisbeing Able To Recognize Professional Res

Capstone Ethical Case Analysisbeing Able To Recognize Professional Res

Complete an ethical case analysis based on a case involving software development at SDX Alliance. The assignment requires you to reflect on your ethical self-awareness, identify the ethical issues, consider alternative solutions, evaluate these options using ethical reasoning, and finally, present your most appropriate course of action with justification.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Ethical awareness and decision-making are fundamental in computing professions, where technical skills must be complemented with an understanding of professional responsibilities and ethical considerations. As emerging professionals, software engineers must navigate complex situations that involve intellectual property, honesty, and professional conduct. This paper explores an ethical case involving Ralph, a software engineer at SDX Alliance, and offers an analysis of the issues, possible resolutions, and justified recommendations grounded in ethical principles.

Question 1: What is Your Ethical Self-Awareness?

My ethical self-awareness is primarily guided by the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, which emphasizes principles like honesty, integrity, respect, and responsibility. These guidelines underscore the importance of maintaining trustworthiness and honoring intellectual property rights in professional practice. Additionally, I am influenced by national legislation such as copyright law and industry standards that regulate software development practices.

My professional beliefs stem from a combination of academic training, mentorship, and personal commitment to ethical conduct. Historically, my understanding of ethics in technology developed from observing instances where ethical lapses led to loss of public trust or legal consequences. I believe that professional conduct is vital because it safeguards stakeholder interests, preserves the integrity of the profession, and fosters an environment of innovation built on trust and accountability.

In the provided case, Ralph’s decision to reuse code from his prior internship without disclosure raises questions about honesty, intellectual property rights, and professional responsibility.

Question 2: Describe the Ethical Issues in this Case

The key ethical and socio-technical issues involve intellectual property, honesty, transparency, professional integrity, and potential legal implications. Ralph’s reuse of code from his previous employment without permission or attribution could violate copyright laws and company policies. This act raises concerns about honesty—whether Ralph intends to deceive his employer—or whether it reflects a deeper issue of professional integrity. Moreover, the decision impacts the company's product quality and reputation if the reused code contains undisclosed flaws or limitations. The potential for misuse or abuse of proprietary code also presents ethical considerations regarding respect for the intellectual property rights of the previous employer.

Furthermore, the societal trust in software products depends on transparency and adherence to legal and ethical standards, which are compromised if such practices become commonplace.

Question 3: Describe Your Ethical Approach or Reasoning Strategy

Part A: Alternatives for Resolving the Case

Several options exist for addressing the ethical issues:

  • Option 1: Ralph discloses the reuse of his previous code and seeks approval or proper licensing from his former employer or legal owner.
  • Option 2: Ralph reconstructs or rewrites the code for SDX Alliance, avoiding reuse from his previous internship.
  • Option 3: Ralph informs his manager about the code’s origin but proceeds with its use, implying that the reuse may be acceptable or that he seeks guidance.
  • Option 4: The company implements strict policies requiring disclosure of sourced code and licensing to prevent future misuse.

Part B: Ethical Decision-Making Criteria

I applied principles from the Markkula Center’s ethical decision-making framework, which emphasizes considering rights, fairness, and utilitarian outcomes. I evaluated alternatives based on legality, honesty, respect for intellectual property, potential impact on stakeholders, and long-term trustworthiness of the organization. The decision should align with professional codes like ACM’s, emphasizing integrity and respect for others’ work.

Question 4: Application of Ethical Reasoning and Evaluation of Options

Considering each alternative:

  • Option 1: Disclose and seek approval — Pros: Upholds honesty and respects intellectual property; aligns with ethical standards. Cons: Might delay project progress; could strain relationships if original code is proprietary or if approval is denied.
  • Option 2: Rebuild the code — Pros: Ensures transparency; avoids legal issues; promotes learning and skill development. Cons: Time-consuming; may require additional resources.
  • Option 3: Inform manager and proceed — Pros: Keeps transparency; allows management to decide. Cons: Could still violate proprietary rights if not properly licensed; ethical compromise if used without permissions.
  • Option 4: Implement policy changes — Pros: Prevents similar issues in future; promotes organizational accountability. Cons: Requires policy development and enforcement efforts.

Overall, the most ethically sound approach is Option 1, as it aligns with respect for intellectual property, honesty, and professional integrity. Requiring Ralph to disclose and seek proper authorization demonstrates adherence to ethical standards and builds organizational trust.

Question 5: Final Decision and Justification

My final decision is that Ralph should disclose his prior code reuse to his manager and seek appropriate approval or licensing. This approach recognizes the importance of transparency, respects intellectual property rights, and maintains professional integrity. It aligns with the ACM Code of Ethics, emphasizing honesty and respect for intellectual property. Although this may introduce project delays, it emphasizes an ethical approach that fosters trust and long-term professionalism. Addressing the issue openly mitigates legal risks and upholds the organization's reputation for integrity. In conclusion, transparency and respect for legal and ethical standards are foundational to responsible computing practices, making this decision the most appropriate.

References

  • ACM Committee on Professional Ethics. (2018). ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Association for Computing Machinery. https://www.acm.org/about-acm/acm-code-of-ethics-and-professional-conduct
  • Baase, S. (2017). A Gift of Fire: Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues in Computing. Pearson.
  • Johnson, D. G. (2019). Computer Ethics. Routledge.
  • Murphy-Hill, R., Guzdial, M., & Carver, J. (2018). Ethical challenges of software engineering research. IEEE Software, 35(3), 112-115.
  • Spinello, R. A. (2019). Cyberethics: Morality and law in cyberspace. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Turilli, M., & Floridi, L. (Eds.). (2018). The Ethics of Information Warfare. Springer.
  • Wolf, M. J. (2012). Ethical Computer Use. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(2), 237-249.
  • Weber, R. H. (2010). Internet of Things: Legal and Ethical Challenges. Computer Law & Security Review, 26(4), 344-352.
  • Ghazali, A., & Wahid, M. (2020). Ethical issues in software engineering. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20(2), 15-23.
  • Reynolds, G. (2018). Ethics in Computing. Pearson.

Related Assignments