Cardiovascular Disorders Application Assignment Rubric
Cardiovascular Disorders Application Assignment Rubricthis Rubric Will
Cardiovascular disorders Application assignment Rubric This rubric will be used to evaluate the Cardiovascular Disorders Application Assignment in this course. Week 2 Application Assignment will be assessed using this rubric. Carefully read this entire rubric before submitting your Application Assignment. This Application Assignment is due by Day 7 of Week 2 . Scoring Instructions · The Application Assignment is worth a maximum of 200 points each.
Points for each assignment will be awarded as follows: · 200–180 (Exemplary) · 179–160 (Proficient) · 159–140(Sufficient) · 139 > (Developing) Note : All written assignments should reflect academic writing standards and have few, if any, spelling, grammar, or syntax errors. 200–180 Points (Exemplary) Writing assignment exceeds the requirements and exceeds academic writing expectations. Each response: · Evaluates and explains in detail the rationale for the addition of each of these new medications and contraindications to their use · Clearly explains all of the possible the side effects of each medication for the patient · Clearly explains all necessary knowledge and/or skills needed to be taught to the patient prior to discharge · Incorporates and pays attention to all of the detailed information from the provided case study · Exceeds the requirements of the application instructions and is submitted by the due date · Is substantive, reflective, and evidence-based by the professional literature · Demonstrates mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of skills or strategies presented in the course · Uses language that is appropriate, and generally clear and concise · Has few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax Points (Proficient) Paper or writing assignment meets the requirements and meets academic writing expectations.
Each response: · Evaluates and explains the rationale for the addition of each of these new medications and contraindications to their use · Clearly explains the possible the side effects of each medication for the patient · Clearly explains necessary knowledge and/or skills needed to be taught to the patient prior to discharge · Incorporates and pays attention to the detailed information from the provided case study · Meets the requirements of the Application instructions and is submitted by the due date · Is substantive, reflective, and evidence-based · Uses language that is appropriate, and generally clear and concise · Has few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax Points (Sufficient) Paper or writing assignment is below the requirements and is below academic writing expectations.
Each response · Does not adequately evaluate and does not adequately explain the rationale for the addition of each of these new medications and contraindications to their use · Explains some of the possible the side effects of each medication for the patient · Explains some knowledge and/or skills needed to be taught to the patient prior to discharge · Incorporates and pays attention to part of the detailed information from the provided case study · Is submitted by the due date but is not always responsive to the requirements of the Application instructions · Lacks substance, relies more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence · Uses language that is unclear and/or inappropriate · Makes more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax 139 or Less Points (Developing) Paper or writing assignment fails to meet the requirements and is well below academic writing expectations.
Each response · Fails to evaluates and fails to explains the rationale for the addition of each of these new medications and contraindications to their use · Fails to explain any possible side effects of each medication for the patient · Fails to explain any knowledge and/or skills needed to be taught to the patient prior to discharge · Does not incorporate and does not pay attention to the detailed information from the provided case study · Is submitted past the due date, and/or does not address the requirements of the Application instructions · Is unsubstantiated and anecdotal · Provides inaccurate information · Contains many omissions and/or critical errors · Uses unclear and inappropriate language · Makes many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax