Care Plan Worksheet For Students, Clients, And Initials

Care Plan Worksheetstudents Namedatetimeclients Initialsadmission

Care Plan Worksheet students Namedatetime clients Initialsadmission

CARE PLAN WORKSHEET Student’s Name: Date/Time: Client’s Initials: Admission Date: Age: Sex: Race: Religion: Allergies: Diet: Activity: Admitting Medical Diagnosis: Past Medical History: Past Surgical History: History of Present Illness: Client Understanding of Illness: PATHOPHYSIOLOGY What Medications are you currently taking at home? MEDICATION TIME(S) WHY? Are your medications causing you any discomfort? OVERVIEW MEDICATION(S) WORKSHEET (TOPICAL, PO, IM, SQ, IV) NAME/CLASSIFICATION DOSE/ROUTEFREQUENCY SAFE RANGE MECHANISM OF ACTION INDICATIONS SIDE EFFECTS NURSING CONSIDERATIONS AND PATIENT EDUCATION Chemistry Normal Values Date Date Hematology Normal Values Date Date Na WBC K RBC Cl Hgb CO2 Hct Ca MCV Glucose MCH BUN MCHC Creatinine Platelets Phosphorus Cholesterol DIFFERENTIAL Total Protein Neutrophils Albumin Bands Alb/Glob Ratio Lymphocytes AST (SGOT) Monocytes ALT (SGPT) Eosinophils Total Bilirubin Basophils Amylase Lipase COAGULATION LIPID PROFILE PT Total Cholesterol INR Triglycerides PTT HDL Bleeding Time LDL Fibrinogen Chol/HDL Ratio GGT OTHER LABS: Labs Normal Values Date Date Labs Normal Values Date Date Relate the clinical significance of abnormal lab values above : Abnormal Lab Value Explain why lab value is abnormal DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES Diagnostic Procedure Report NURSING CARE PLAN Assessment Subjective/Objective Date Priority Nursing DX/Clinical Problem Client Goals/Desired Outcomes/ Objectives Nursing Interventions/Actions/Orders and Rationale Evaluation Paper One Length : words/ 3.5-4 pages, exclusive of the Work Cited page For your first paper, you’ll be analyzing impediments to your own critical thinking and how they shaped your decision making in a specific decision in your life. First, think back to a decision you’ve made that you either now see as a bad decision or that you’re still not fully sure you thought through critically. It doesn’t have to be a super-personal decision (why did I date that girl for so long in high school?), and it can even be a decision that’s had a good outcome (why did I choose this university?), as long as you can express how you didn’t really think critically about it at the time. Elements of Reasoning : For prewriting purposes, go around the circle of elements with this decision as you made it then, paying close attention to who you were when you made it (your Point of View). You’ll want to use these notes as you describe your decision-making process and put any elements of reasoning in bold in your paper. Plan to use between 3-5 elements of reasoning in your paper. Impediments : Finally, think about what types of impediments got in your way as you made this decision. Develop paragraphs in your paper around these impediments and put them in bold type in your paper as well. Your thesis statement should say something about how the impediments that blocked your critical thinking interacted with the elements of reasoning to keep you from using them effectively. Because all papers in CRTW must include documented material, make sure you quote Nosich at least once when talking about at least one impediment that hindered your critical thinking. You'll then need to give the page number in MLA format in your paper and create a Works Cited page with Nosich's book on it at the end of your paper. Hints: 1. Don’t be afraid to use the first person “I.” This is a paper about you and your thinking. 2. You can tell this as a story if you’d like, so long as it’s clear that you’re analyzing your own thinking and which impediments and elements of reasoning were (or weren’t) involved. 3. Whether you tell this as a story or write it as a more formal academic paper, your introduction should give some context to your decision: when was it, what was it, and why did you need to make it? 4. In your conclusion, rather than repeating what you’ve already said in the introduction and body of the paper, please try to reflect on what you’ve learned from analyzing this decision and/or making the decision in the first place. What might you do differently in the future? How might you approach the same impediment(s) if you feel them creeping into your thought process in future decisions?

Paper For Above instruction

The task involves analyzing a personal decision through the lens of critical thinking, focusing on impediments that hindered effective reasoning. The chosen decision can be either perceived as poor or uncertain in its critical evaluation at the time, regardless of the outcome's positivity or negativity. This reflective analysis aims to identify specific elements of reasoning involved during the decision-making process, such as point of view, assumptions, implications, and consequences. It also requires scrutinizing impediments like biases, emotions, or incomplete information that obstructed critical analysis.

Beginning with an introduction providing context—detailing when, what, and why the decision was made—the paper should proceed to identify and describe 3-5 relevant elements of reasoning, emphasizing how each influenced the decision process. For each element, the writer should clarify its role and interconnectedness within the decision-making. Subsequently, the paper should outline impediments that hindered critical thinking, illustrating how these obstacles interacted with the reasoning elements to compromise sound judgment. These impediments may include cognitive biases, emotional barriers, or external influences, and should be highlighted in bold.

A key component is referencing Nosich’s work on critical thinking, particularly quoting him at least once on a specific impediment, with appropriate MLA citation including page number. The thesis should explicitly state how these impediments interacted with the elements of reasoning, preventing effective critical thinking. The narrative can be in the form of a story or a formal analysis, but clarity about personal involvement and reflection is essential.

The conclusion should go beyond mere summary, reflecting on lessons learned from analyzing the decision and considering strategies for future improvements, especially how to recognize and manage impediments before they interfere with reasoning again. The overall length should be approximately 3.5-4 pages, excluding references, with at least 10 credible sources cited in the references section in APA or MLA format.