Case 10-1 Young Again Pharmaceuticals Joe Hannibal, Senior D ✓ Solved

Case 10-1 Young Again Pharmaceuticals Joe Hannibal, senior director of

Young Again Pharmaceuticals (YAP) is preparing for a major product launch involving a groundbreaking liquid suspension that reverses aging in individuals over 35. The product, dubbed "Twenty-something in a Bottle," is highly anticipated, expensive, and produced in Dublin, Ireland. Its distribution in North America involves significant logistics challenges given the sensitive, high-value, and easily stolen nature of the shipment. Joe Hannibal, Senior Director of Transportation at YAP, must select appropriate carriers and ensure the safe, timely, and secure delivery of the product from Ireland to retail pharmacies in the United States and Canada.

Initially, Hannibal and his logistics team identified various risks associated with this critical shipment. These included delays leading to vendor charge-backs from retailers, weather-related hazards such as hurricanes, temperature sensitivity that could compromise the product quality, piracy and theft risks at ports and in transit, customs and documentation issues at borders, brand damage from unauthorized distribution, and challenges posed by reduced packaging sustainability measures which could lead to damage if cartons become wet or are mishandled. Additionally, congestion at major U.S. East Coast ports during peak shipping season could cause delays, further complicating the supply chain.

Recognizing the importance of a systematic approach, Hannibal decided to conduct a detailed risk assessment, evaluating each identified threat for its likelihood and potential impact. This process would help in developing mitigation strategies, selecting appropriate transportation modes and carriers, and establishing contingency plans to ensure the product’s safe delivery. The risk assessment would involve gathering data on weather patterns, port congestion, theft statistics, piracy reports, customs procedures, and packaging robustness, alongside collaboration with logistics partners and security experts.

Effective risk management planning in this context is crucial due to the high stakes involved. The product's value not only magnifies the financial risk but also the potential damage to YAP’s brand reputation if compromised. This comprehensive process will enable Hannibal to make informed transportation decisions, allocate resources efficiently, and build resilience into the supply chain, ultimately ensuring the successful launch of the revolutionary anti-aging product.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Risk assessment in international supply chain logistics is a vital component of strategic planning, especially when dealing with high-value, fragile, and sensitive products such as Young Again Pharmaceuticals’ (YAP) latest anti-aging formulation. The success of such a product launch hinges on meticulous planning and effective management of potential risks throughout the transportation process, from manufacturing to delivery at retail outlets.

Understanding and evaluating risks begins with identifying potential hazards, which in YAP’s case include delays, theft, weather disruptions, temperature control issues, piracy, border complications, and port congestion. Each of these risks carries varying degrees of probability and impact, requiring a structured approach to assessment. Risk assessment involves quantifying both the likelihood of occurrence and the severity of consequences, thereby prioritizing risks for targeted mitigation strategies.

One foundational step in risk assessment is to analyze historical data and current intelligence sources on weather patterns, piracy reports, port congestion levels, and customs enforcement policies. For example, hurricane season data can inform risk models for weather-related delays and damage. Maritime piracy reports, particularly in high-risk zones like the Gulf of Aden or parts of West Africa, help evaluate theft and hijacking threats at sea. Similarly, port congestion statistics, particularly during peak seasons on the U.S. East Coast, support predictions of delays that could impact delivery schedules.

Alongside quantitative data analysis, qualitative assessments involve expert opinions and scenario planning. This entails engaging shipping partners, customs officials, security firms, and logistics consultants to imagine worst-case scenarios and develop contingency plans. For example, if a port is congested, alternative routes or shipping modes—such as air freight—may be considered for critical shipments. If theft risks at ports are high, steps like increased security measures, tamper-evident packaging, or secure transportation arrangements can be implemented.

Temperature sensitivity presents unique challenges, requiring assessment of container specifications and reevaluation of the transportation environment. Cold chain logistics must be rigorously verified, including the use of GPS and temperature sensors, to safeguard product integrity. Additionally, the reduction of packaging for sustainability considerations must be balanced against the risk of physical damage during transit and handling. Ensuring robust packaging and protective measures is thus essential in the risk evaluation process.

The process also extends to evaluating security concerns such as cargo theft and piracy. The high retail value of the product (nearly $875,000 per container) makes it a lucrative target. Security measures may include choosing carriers with strong security protocols, secure container seals, and real-time tracking systems. For example, several studies have shown that technological enhancements, including GPS tracking and theft deterrent devices, significantly reduce the risk of cargo theft in transit.

Furthermore, risk assessment must consider regulatory compliance, especially regarding customs documentation and marking requirements. Failure to adhere to these regulations can lead to fines, delays, or confiscation, all of which are undesirable outcomes. Proper documentation, timely customs clearance, and clear labeling are crucial measures to mitigate border-related risks.

Incorporating these diverse risk factors into a comprehensive risk management framework enables YAP’s logistics team to develop a resilient transportation plan. This plan may include selecting carriers with proven safety records, utilizing multimodal transport options, establishing emergency response protocols, and maintaining close communication with port authorities and customs officials.

Ultimately, a systematic and thorough risk assessment is indispensable for safeguarding high-value, sensitive products in international shipping. It provides the foundation for risk mitigation strategies that protect the company’s financial interests, brand reputation, and customer satisfaction. In an era of increasingly complex and unpredictable global supply chains, such proactive planning ensures that innovative products reach the market safely and on time, thereby supporting the company's strategic goals and market success.

References

• Bogataj, M., & Bajec, M. (2017). Supply chain risk management: A case study analysis. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 28(4), 508–530.
• Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Harrison, A., & Van Hoek, R. (2017). Logistics management and strategy: Competing through the supply chain. Pearson.
• Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003). Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6(4), 197–210.
• Leonenko, N., et al. (2019). Managing supply chain risks in the era of digital transformation. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(4), 330–342.
• Pieniążek, J., & Lasota, M. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of risk mitigation measures in maritime logistics. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 22(4), 487–509.
• Rao, S., & Goldsby, T. (2009). Supply chain risks: a review and typology. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 97–123.
• Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and case studies. McGraw-Hill.
• Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.
• Wang, T., et al. (2020). Advances in supply chain risk management: A review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 965–979.