Case 122 Olympic Rowers In The 1930s Rowing Was The Most Pop

Case 122olympic Rowers In The 1930s Rowing Was The Most Popular Spo

Case 122olympic Rowers In The 1930s Rowing Was The Most Popular Sport in the country. The sport was not only physically brutal but also demanded relentless teamwork. An eight-man rowing shell required each member to perform their role flawlessly and synchronize precisely with others. Any mistake by a single rower could disrupt the entire crew's rhythm and jeopardize their success. In the 1930s, rowing was dominated by elite East Coast universities like Cornell, Harvard, and Princeton, but West Coast teams such as the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Washington fostered intense rivalries among themselves and with the Eastern crews.

Al Ulbrickson, the varsity crew coach at the University of Washington, aimed to see his team represent the United States at the 1936 Berlin Olympics. His program included talented and hardworking rowers, many from humble, working-class backgrounds, who contributed to the team's cohesion and resilience. Ulbrickson’s process involved experimenting with different team compositions, emphasizing not just physical ability but also personality fit and chemistry. He sought a group of rowers who shared traits like toughness, humility, and determination, which had been cultivated through their challenging backgrounds and shared hardships.

The finalized team embodied these qualities and forged a strong sense of unity. When they competed in Berlin, despite facing setbacks such as an ill teammate, distraction, and a delayed start, their cohesion and mental resilience helped them overcome adversity and win Olympic gold. The team's achievement was a testament to the power of collective effort and the significance of team cohesion in high-stakes sports. Rowing, as highlighted by Brown (2013), emphasizes the abandonment of the individual self in favor of the team, achieving a symphony of synchronized effort that supersedes individual brilliance.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The case of the 1930s Olympic rowers provides a fertile ground for analyzing followership, leadership, team cohesion, and the dynamic interplay between individual and group effort in achieving exceptional performance. At the core of this narrative is the understanding that effective followership is crucial in high-performance teams, particularly in sports demanding absolute synchronization like rowing. The members of the crew function not only as followers but also as active agents influencing the team's culture and performance.

Followership and Leadership in the Olympic Rowing Team

Followership in this context pertains to the crew members who, despite being followers, drive the team toward success through their commitment, discipline, and cohesion. The followers in this scenario are the individual rowers, who must harmonize their efforts, maintain rigorous discipline, and respond collectively to the leadership of the coach and coxswain. The coxswain's role, sitting at the stern and responsible for steering and coordinating the crew, is particularly critical. While the coxswain is traditionally viewed as a leader, the importance of each crew member's role suggests that leadership is distributed, with the coxswain functioning as an internal team leader, facilitating synchronization and strategy implementation.

In this case, the coxswain’s role is arguably more than just navigation; it encompasses motivating the crew, maintaining morale, and ensuring optimal rhythm and pacing. The coxswain’s influence on team cohesion and performance is profound, especially given the high-pressure environment of Olympic competition. The synchronized effort of the crew requires the coxswain to be both a leader and a follower—a coordinator who responds to the team’s needs while guiding them toward common goals.

The Impact of Followers’ Characteristics on Followership Behavior

Followers’ characteristics, such as humility, determination, and resilience, significantly impact their behavior and, consequently, the team’s success. The rowers’ backgrounds of hardship and their collective humility fostered a shared sense of purpose that transcended individual egos. These traits led to behaviors grounded in trust, cooperation, and a collective focus, which enhanced the crew’s cohesion and performance. The willingness of each member to subsume personal egos for the good of the team exemplifies how follower traits influence followership outcomes.

Ulbrickson’s perception of his team and his behavioral strategies also affected follower behavior. By deliberately selecting rowers who shared similar values and characteristics, the coach cultivated a culture of humility, determination, and unity. His feedback, experimentation with team formations, and emphasis on chemistry encouraged followers to adopt a collective mindset. Through these approaches, Ulbrickson fostered followers’ behaviors aligned with teamwork, patience, and resilience—traits vital for overcoming challenges like illness or adverse race conditions.

Impact of Leaders and Followers on Followership Outcomes

The success of the 1936 Olympic team illustrates that both leaders and followers significantly influence followership outcomes. Ulbrickson’s leadership in selecting rowers with the right traits, encouraging experimentation, and emphasizing team cohesion created an environment where followers thrived. His behavior exemplified transformational leadership qualities—motivating followers through shared vision and values.

Conversely, the followers’ characteristics—toughness, humility, and perseverance—were essential to translating leadership efforts into tangible success. Their willingness to accept their roles, work through adversity, and maintain focus contributed to their resilience in the face of obstacles. This symbiotic relationship shows that effective followership is not passive but an active process where followers influence the overall team dynamic and outcomes.

Team Cohesion and Effectiveness in High-Performing Teams

Although the Washington crew demonstrated extraordinary cohesion, high followership does not always guarantee cohesiveness. Factors such as personality conflicts, differing goals, or lack of shared values can undermine team unity. In this case, the common hardships and shared background of the rowers fostered a sense of solidarity. Their humility and mutual respect built trust and commitment, forming a cohesive team that was greater than the sum of its parts.

However, it is possible for a team to be effective without strong cohesion if its members possess exceptional individual skills and a clear focus on task completion. For instance, some teams may operate with mere functional coordination rather than deep emotional bonds. Still, in high-stakes sports such as rowing, cohesion becomes a key contributor to superior performance, as it ensures synchronization, resilience, and collective motivation.

Conclusion

The case of the 1930s Olympic rowing team exemplifies the critical roles of followership, leadership, and team cohesion in achieving excellence. The shared traits and behaviors of followers, coupled with transformational leadership qualities, cultivated a unified team capable of overcoming immense challenges and winning gold. This historic example underscores that effective followership is active, motivated by shared values and collective goals, and that cohesion often amplifies team performance in demanding contexts.

References

• Brown, K. (2013). The Boys in the Boat: Nine Americans and Their Epic Quest for Gold at the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Penguin Publishing Group.
• Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Kelley, R. E. (1988). In Praise of Followers. Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 142-148.
• Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (2015). Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2000). Why Should Anyone Be Led by You? The Real World of Leadership. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594.
• Millis, B. J. (2017). The Role of Team Cohesion in Athletic Performance. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 41(4), 307-324.
• Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287.
• Carsten, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2013). Teaming: A key to developing effective followers and followers as leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 232-248.