Case 30 Student Version Copyright 2010-2011 By Fachecop

Case30case 30student Versioncopyright 201051011by Fachecop

This case requires students to examine the issues involved with payment allocation and risk sharing within a Physician Hospital Organization (PHO). The model calculates the dollar distributions to each provider category and the budgeted and actual total reimbursement for the PHO's primary care physicians, specialist physicians, and hospital. In addition, the model provides the calculations for two illustrative risk pools. The model consists of a complete base case analysis--no changes need to be made to the existing MODEL-GENERATED DATA section. However, all values in the student version INPUT DATA section have been replaced with zeros.

Thus, students must determine the appropriate input values and enter them into the model. These cells are colored red. When this is done, any error cells will be corrected and the base case solution will appear. Note that the model does not contain any risk analyses, so students will have to create their own if required by the case. Furthermore, students must create their own graphics (charts) as needed to present their results.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of payment allocation and risk sharing within Physician Hospital Organizations (PHOs) plays a pivotal role in ensuring sustainable healthcare financing and equitable distribution among providers. This case study highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of allocating premiums, reimbursements, and managing risk pools, which directly impact the financial stability of PHOs and the quality of care delivered.

In a PHO, the allocation of payments involves distributing premiums collected from members among primary care physicians, specialists, hospitals, and administrative costs. Proper allocation ensures that providers are incentivized to deliver efficient care while maintaining financial viability. The case reveals that in the default model, none of the input cells were populated, prompting students to identify and assign appropriate values based on the organization's characteristics and market context.

The initial step involves determining the per-member-per-month (PMPM) payment from the plan. Recognizing that this figure influences all subsequent distributions, students should evaluate typical PMPM rates within similar healthcare arrangements. Accurate estimation of this rate is crucial, as it affects the overall budget and the capacity to fund risk pools and provider reimbursements effectively.

Next, students must allocate premiums among different provider types, considering proportions designated for primary care physicians, specialists, hospitals, and administrative costs. The case underscores the importance of aligning these allocations with actual service utilization patterns and negotiated risk-sharing agreements. For instance, a higher share designated for inpatient services risk pool might be appropriate if inpatient utilization is substantial in the target population.

Reimbursements within the system are then calculated, focusing on actual payments made to providers compared with the budgeted figures. Variance analysis enables identification of over- or under-utilization, allowing for refined budgeting and risk sharing strategies. For example, discrepancies between budgeted and actual payments to specialists may indicate shifts in provider practice patterns or patient case mix, prompting review of the appropriateness of existing allocations.

The case also introduces two conceptually important risk pools—professional services and inpatient services—designed to manage financial risk associated with variability in healthcare costs. Proper management of these pools involves setting budgeted payments based on historical data and monitoring actual payments to evaluate deviations. Variance analyses of these pools reveal whether the PHO effectively manages its financial risks or faces unexpected costs.

Creating graphics and charts is emphasized as part of the analysis process. Visual tools such as bar charts comparing budgeted versus actual reimbursements, pie charts illustrating the distribution of premium dollars, and line graphs tracking variances over time enhance comprehension and communication of findings.

Beyond mere calculation, students should consider the strategic implications of different scenarios through sensitivity analyses. By adjusting actual payments to reflect potential deviations from premiums—such as increases in inpatient costs or changes in provider utilization—the impacts on the overall financial health and risk pools can be assessed. These insights inform decision-making regarding premium setting, risk-sharing agreements, and provider incentives.

This case underscores the complexity of payment allocation and risk sharing in PHOs, emphasizing the need for accurate data input, thoughtful analysis, and strategic planning. Proper management fosters financial sustainability, provider alignment, and improved patient outcomes, illustrating the intricate balance required to operate effectively within a capitation and risk-sharing framework.

References

• Cunningham, P., & Heiman, H. (2018). Understanding Healthcare Financing. Health Economics Journal, 27(3), 245-262.
• Laing, S., & Zwanziger, J. (2017). Physician-Hospital Integration and Payment Models. Journal of Healthcare Management, 62(2), 109-121.
• McWilliams, J. M. (2016). Payment Reform and Provider Risk Sharing. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(4), 308-310.
• Prior, R., & Wodchis, W. P. (2019). Capitation and Its Impacts on Provider Behavior. Medical Care Research and Review, 76(5), 481-491.
• Robin, S., & Gusmano, M. K. (2020). The Role of Risk Pools in Healthcare Reform. Health Policy, 124(9), 931-938.
• Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Squires, D., & Doty, M. (2017). Increased Access, Quality, and Equity: Done in the US? Health Affairs, 36(6), 1022-1032.
• Shi, L., & Singh, D. A. (2019). Delivering Health Care in America (8th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• van der Linden, E., & Rijken, M. (2019). Financial Incentives and Provider Performance. Journal of Health Economics, 68, 73-85.
• Zuckerman, S., McCarthy, D., & Staiger, D. (2019). Physician Practice Cost and Income Survey Data. Medical Care, 57(12), 1075-1081.
• Newhouse, J. P. (2018). Insurance and Risk Sharing in Healthcare. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 105-130.