Case Analysis 2 Due Sunday By 11:59 Pm Points 75 Submitting

Case Analysis 2 Due Sunday By 1159pm Points 75 Submitting A File

Analyze three key cases related to international business: Turkey’s potential EU membership and the intersection of Islam, capitalism, and globalization; the benefits and disruptions of free trade for the United States; and the implications of NAFTA and the updated USMCA agreement for various stakeholders. Your analysis should include a thorough discussion of each case using relevant chapter readings, research, and supporting citations. Address the key questions for each case, demonstrating understanding of core international business concepts, with clear logic and evidence-based arguments. The paper must be well-structured, grammatically correct, free of typos, and formatted according to APA standards, including at least five credible references. Paraphrase all sources, and cite appropriately, especially for direct quotes. Use headings for each key question and a conclusion that synthesizes the insights across all cases.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

International business is shaped significantly by geopolitical, economic, and cultural factors. Analyzing cases such as Turkey’s EU accession ambitions, the economic benefits of free trade, and the intricacies of trade agreements like NAFTA and USMCA reveals insights into how nations and corporations navigate the global marketplace. This paper explores these cases in detail, applying key international business concepts to evaluate their implications for policy, economic growth, and corporate strategy.

Turkey, Its Religion, and Politics: Are Concerns About EU Membership Well-Founded? Can Islam, Capitalism, and Globalization Coexist?

Turkey has long aspired to join the European Union, a process complicated by internal debates over religion, politics, and economics. Critics argue that integrating Turkey could introduce challenges related to cultural differences, particularly regarding Islam's role in society and politics (Kadioglu, 2017). Detractors fear that Islam and Western capitalism might not harmonize, citing fears about secularism and social stability (Ozdalga, 2007). However, empirical evidence from regions around Kayseri challenges this narrative.

Kayseri exemplifies an entrepreneurial Islamic culture fostering successful businesses in textiles, food, and engineering, driven by religious values intertwined with a strong work ethic and globalization (Cizre, 2018). Such examples suggest that Islamic principles can coexist with capitalism, potentially contributing to economic development. Moreover, the theory of Islamic Calvinism posits that traditional Islamic values, particularly the emphasis on work and honor, can foster an entrepreneurial mindset compatible with modern economics (Roy, 2017).

Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding gender roles and female labor participation. The European Stability Initiative highlights that low female workforce participation, rooted in traditional attitudes, could hamper regional economic growth, underscoring complex social barriers that might conflict with EU standards on gender equality (European Stability Initiative, 2010). Thus, while Turkey demonstrates the capacity for coexistence via economic resilience and entrepreneurial spirit, social and political challenges remain.

Estimating the Gains from Trade for America: Benefits and Disruptions

The Institute for International Economics (2005) estimates that reductions in tariffs and trade barriers since 1947 have profoundly benefited the U.S. economy, with an increase of approximately 7.3% in GDP and annual gains around $1 trillion (Bradford et al., 2005). These gains translate to roughly $9,000 extra per household annually. Extending free trade to eliminate tariffs entirely could generate additional gains between $450 billion and $1.3 trillion, significantly boosting household incomes (Litan & Krulikowski, 2017).

However, these benefits come with transitional costs, notably employment disruptions. The same study estimates that expansion of trade could lead to the loss of about 682,000 jobs annually, with displaced workers experiencing wage reductions of approximately 13-14%. Nonetheless, the net effect favors economic growth, as new jobs created and higher productivity offset the losses (Coughlin, 2019).

Philosophically, the question arises whether economic benefits outweigh social costs. From a pragmatic perspective, policy measures such as worker retraining and social safety nets are vital to mitigate disruptions, making free trade an essential driver of long-term prosperity despite short-term hardships (Bivens & Freedman, 2017). Overall, the empirical evidence affirms that the advantages of free trade in increasing national income and living standards outweigh the negatives, provided adequate support mechanisms are in place.

NAFTA 2.0: The USMCA and Its Impact on Stakeholders

Under President Trump, NAFTA was critically reexamined, leading to the renegotiated USMCA. Trump accused NAFTA of harming American jobs, particularly in manufacturing and automotive sectors (Horrigan & Costello, 2018). The USMCA introduces stricter rules of origin, raising the content threshold for tariff-free vehicles from 62.5% to 75%, and mandates that 40% of auto parts be produced by workers earning at least $16 per hour (U.S. International Trade Commission, 2019).

For American consumers, especially car buyers, NAFTA and USMCA influence prices and product availability. The stricter sourcing requirements may lead to higher vehicle costs but also promote domestic manufacturing. For Mexican and Canadian consumers, changes could mean shifts in supply chain dynamics but also increased integration of high-wage manufacturing sectors (Burfesser & Hankey, 2018).

Automotive industry stakeholders, especially CEOs of auto companies with facilities in Mexico, face strategic adjustments. While increased manufacturing costs could impact profitability, there is also an opportunity for investment in higher-wage factories to meet USMCA requirements (Gereffi et al., 2019). Ultimately, the revised agreement aims to bolster North American manufacturing, reduce dependency on low-wage production, and increase economic integration—advantages balanced against potential higher costs and adjustment challenges for firms.

Conclusion

These cases collectively underscore the complex interplay between cultural values, economic policies, and international agreements in shaping global commerce. Turkey’s example illustrates that Islamic values can be compatible with capitalism, especially when supported by globalization and entrepreneurial initiatives, though social issues like gender participation pose challenges. The analysis of free trade emphasizes its substantial benefits for national income and individual prosperity despite transitional employment disruptions, which can be managed through policy interventions. Lastly, the evolution of NAFTA into USMCA reflects efforts to recalibrate trade agreements to support higher wages, domestic manufacturing, and economic integration, albeit with implications for costs and global supply chains. Understanding these dynamics is essential for policymakers and business leaders navigating the evolving landscape of international business.

References

  • Bivens, J., & Freedman, J. (2017). The real unemployment rate and the economics of job loss. Economic Policy Institute.
  • Burfesser, S., & Hankey, S. (2018). Trade policies and automotive supply chains in North America. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(4), 529-546.
  • Cizre, U. (2018). Islam and entrepreneurship in Turkey: The Kayseri case. New Perspectives on Turkey, 59, 55-78.
  • Coughlin, C. C. (2019). Economic impacts of trade liberalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 145-168.
  • European Stability Initiative. (2010). Women’s participation in the workforce: Turkey’s Achilles’ heel. ESI Report.
  • Gereffi, G., Wadhwa, E., & Basu, A. (2019). North American trade and supply chain restructuring. Global Economy Journal, 19(3), 341-372.
  • Horrigan, B., & Costello, M. (2018). USMCA and automotive trade: Impacts for North America. Wall Street Journal.
  • Kadioglu, S. (2017). Turkey and the European Union: Negotiations and challenges. Journal of Contemporary Politics, 23(2), 9-27.
  • Ozdalga, E. (2007). Secularism and Islam in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 43(4), 663-680.
  • Roy, O. (2017). Islamic Calvinism? Islam and economic ethics. Journal of Islamic Economics, 12(1), 15-32.
  • U.S. International Trade Commission. (2019). The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Economic effects. USITC Publication 4882.
  • Litan, R., & Krulikowski, J. (2017). The benefits of free trade and economic growth. Brookings Institution Policy Brief.

Related Assignments