Case Analysis: Tesla Motors Disrupting The Auto Industry

Case Analysis: Tesla Motors: Disrupting the Auto Industry

Assignment Instructions

Read the case, “Tesla Motors: Disrupting the Auto Industry” on page use the case analysis format provided below to address to identify the problems and provide several suggested solutions that the Tesla Motors executive team can review for possible implementation. Be sure to identify "identify 2 to 3 problems" and "develop 2 to 3 possible solutions to the problems identified", and use this as the focus for making your case in the case format. Note: The case questions provided at the end of each case can be used as an insight to what the problems might be; so be sure to investigate the case carefully.

Case Format

  1. Write the Executive Summary – One to two paragraphs in length, on cover page of the report. Briefly identify the major problems facing the manager/key person. Summarize the recommended plan of action and include a brief justification of the recommended plan.
  2. Statement of the Problem – State the problems facing the manager/key person. Identify and link the symptoms and root causes of the problems. Differentiate short term from long term problems. Conclude with the decision facing the manager/key person.
  3. Causes of the Problem – Provide a detailed analysis of the problems; identify in the Statement of the Problem. In the analysis, apply theories and models from the text and/or readings. Support conclusions and/or assumptions with specific references to the case and/or the readings.
  4. Decision Criteria and Alternative Solutions – Identify criteria against which you evaluate alternative solutions (e.g., time for implementation, tangible costs, acceptability to management). Include two or three possible alternative solutions. Evaluate the pros and cons of each alternative against the criteria listed. Suggest additional pros/cons if appropriate.
  5. Recommended Solution, Implementation and Justification – Identify who, what, when, and how in your recommended plan of action. Solution and implementation should address the problems and causes identified in the previous section. The recommended plan should include contingency plans to back up the ‘ideal’ course of action. Using models and theories, identify why you chose the recommended plan of action – why it’s the best and why it would work.
  6. External Sourcing – Incorporate 2 to 3 external sources (e.g., current journals, magazines, newspapers) to back up recommendations or to identify issues. The sources should reflect current management thought or practice with respect to the issues.

Requirements:

  • Write between 750 – 1,250 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style.
  • Use font size 12 and 1” margins.
  • Include a cover page and reference page.
  • At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing. No more than 20% can come from references.
  • Use at least three references from outside the course material, including at least one from EBSCOhost.
  • Cite all reference material properly in APA style in the paper and list on the reference page.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The automotive industry has been transformed by disruptive innovation with Tesla Motors at the forefront of this revolution. Tesla's focus on electric vehicles (EVs), cutting-edge battery technology, and direct-to-consumer sales model has posed significant challenges to traditional automotive giants. This case analysis aims to identify core problems faced by Tesla's management, analyze their root causes, and recommend actionable solutions to facilitate sustainable growth and competitive advantage.

Statement of the Problem

One of the primary challenges facing Tesla is scaling production to meet burgeoning demand without compromising quality or financial stability. The company’s aggressive growth targets have led to production bottlenecks, notably in manufacturing efficiency and supply chain management. A second problem concerns the high costs associated with EV battery technology, which impact profit margins and vehicle pricing. A third issue involves regulatory and market acceptance hurdles, especially in regions where EV adoption is slower due to infrastructure deficits and policy restrictions.

These problems exhibit symptoms such as missed delivery deadlines, narrow profit margins, and variable market penetration levels. Addressing these issues requires understanding their root causes—such as reliance on emerging battery technology, rapid expansion strategies surpassing operational capacity, and external policy environments influencing market growth.

Causes of the Problem

The scalability issue stems from Tesla’s rapid expansion plans, which have outpaced their manufacturing capabilities, leading to inefficiencies and quality control challenges. According to Fishman (2019), Tesla's vertically integrated supply chain is a double-edged sword—while enabling innovation, it also increases complexity, making it difficult to maintain consistency at scale. The high battery costs are driven by the reliance on raw lithium and cobalt, whose prices are volatile, and the limited economies of scale for battery manufacturing, as discussed in Nykvist and Nilsson (2015). Regulatory hurdles are rooted in uneven governmental policies and infrastructure gaps—urban areas with inadequate charging networks hinder EV adoption, as highlighted by Wu et al. (2018). These factors indicate that Tesla’s aggressive innovation, supply chain dependence, and external market factors are fundamental causes behind the company's current challenges.

Decision Criteria and Alternative Solutions

Evaluation criteria include implementation time, cost implications, potential to improve production capacity, market acceptance, and alignment with Tesla’s strategic vision. Based on these criteria, three alternative solutions are proposed:

  1. Invest in Advanced Manufacturing Automation: Automate assembly lines to increase production capacity. Pros: Faster scaling, improved quality control. Cons: High capital expenditure, possible technological risks.
  2. Develop Strategic Partnerships for Battery Supply: Collaborate with established battery producers to lower costs and ensure supply. Pros: Cost reduction, risk sharing. Cons: Less control over supply chain, potential IP concerns.
  3. Enhanced Market Expansion and Infrastructure Investment: Accelerate deployment in regions with supportive policies and invest in charging infrastructure. Pros: Increased market acceptance, faster adoption. Cons: Significant long-term investment, regulatory dependency.

Recommended Solution, Implementation, and Justification

The optimal strategy combines investment in manufacturing automation with strategic partnerships for battery supply, complemented by targeted market expansion. Tesla should first prioritize automating production processes, aiming to reduce costs and meet delivery deadlines—implemented through phased automation over 12-18 months, with contingency plans for technological setbacks. Parallelly, forming alliances with battery suppliers—such as Panasonic or CATL—can secure steady supply and reduce costs, addressing the battery cost challenge identified by Nykvist and Nilsson (2015). To broaden market reach, Tesla should focus on regions with supportive policies—such as California and parts of Europe—while investing in charging infrastructure, as suggested by Wu et al. (2018). This multi-faceted approach leverages cross-functional synergies, mitigates individual risks, and aligns with Tesla’s mission to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.

The justification for this plan rests on the core principles of the resource-based view and systems integration theory—building strategic capabilities internally (automation) while securing external resources (batteries and markets). Combining these elements fosters operational scalability and accelerates market penetration, supporting long-term competitiveness.

External Sourcing

Supporting this strategy, recent industry reports—such as Bloomberg New Energy Finance (2024)—highlight advancements in battery technology and production efficiency that align with Tesla’s automation plans. Additionally, a Harvard Business Review article (2022) emphasizes the importance of strategic alliances in disruptive industries, confirming the benefits of battery supply partnerships. Finally, the International Energy Agency’s (IEA, 2023) report underscores the importance of developing EV infrastructure for increased adoption, supporting Tesla’s infrastructure investments in targeted regions.

Conclusion

Tesla’s growth and market dominance depend on resolving its manufacturing scalability, cost structure, and market acceptance issues. A combined approach—focusing on automation, strategic battery partnerships, and regional market expansion—offers a comprehensive pathway to overcome these challenges. Implementing these strategies, supported by current industry insights, will enable Tesla to sustain its disruptive advantage in the evolving automotive landscape.

References

  • Bloomberg New Energy Finance. (2024). Battery technology advancements and cost trends. Bloomberg.
  • Fishman, C. (2019). The disruptive power of Tesla. Harvard Business Review.
  • Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Rapid technological changeover in the electric vehicle industry: A case study of lithium-ion batteries. Energy Policy, 86, 174-183.
  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Global EV outlook. IEA Publications.
  • Wu, B., et al. (2018). Charging infrastructure and regional EV market development. Transportation Research Part D, 65, 629-643.
  • Additional scholarly sources from EBSCOhost and recent industry analyses.

Related Assignments