Case Combining Assets And Activities Of The Tampa Florida Co

Casecombiningassetsandactivitiesthecommunityoftampafloridahasadivers

Describe the vertical and horizontal dimensions of this organization. Describe the authority and responsibility relationships present in this organization. Should this practice become centralized, decentralized, mechanistic, or organic in its design? Defend your answer.

Explain the importance of differentiation; integration; and managing complexity, interdependence, and boundary-spanning activities for this organization. Draw an organization chart for this practice and explain which form of departmentalization you believe best fits the unit.

Paper For Above instruction

The organization formed by the three physicians in Tampa, Florida, exemplifies a hybrid structure designed to optimize patient care, facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration, and adapt to diverse community needs. Analyzing its vertical and horizontal dimensions, authority and responsibility relationships, and organizational design choices provides insight into operational efficacy and strategic growth potential.

Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions of the Organization

The vertical dimension of this medical organization encapsulates the chain of command, decision-making authority, and supervision levels. Given the physicians’ shared authority, the vertical structure is relatively flat, with decision-making centralized among the physicians themselves, particularly in strategic issues such as expanding the practice or adding new specialties. The office manager and support staff occupy subordinate levels, executing operational tasks such as scheduling, billing, and administrative support. The clinical nurse practitioner and hospital liaison also operate within this framework, reporting to or working alongside the physicians.

On the horizontal dimension, the organization integrates various functional units—clinical services (obstetrics, gynecology, urology), support services (administrative, billing, scheduling), and hospital coordination. These functions are interconnected, facilitating patient care across different specialties and locations. The horizontal integration ensures that different disciplines and operational activities work collaboratively, while the emphasis on interrelated specialties fosters a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare delivery.

Authority and Responsibility Relationships

The new organization operates as a partnership, with authority shared equally among the three physicians. Decisions are made by majority rule—two of three—indicating a collective authority model. The office manager and support staff have delegated responsibilities, with the office manager overseeing daily operations and support functions, while the nurses and hospital liaison handle specific clinical and coordination duties. Responsibility for patient care, hospital relations, and administrative tasks is distributed across these roles, but ultimate accountability rests with the physicians’ collective authority, which allows for collaborative decision-making and shared responsibility.

This structure fosters a participative environment, leveraging the expertise of each physician and supporting staff, but requires clear communication channels to ensure responsibilities are well understood and tasks are effectively coordinated.

Organizational Design: Centralized, Decentralized, Mechanistic, or Organic?

This medical practice leans towards a decentralized and organic organizational structure. Decentralization is evident as physicians retain autonomy in clinical decisions and strategic choices, while support staff and hospital liaison personnel operate with delegated authority. An organic structure is characterized by flexibility, informal communication, and adaptability—traits necessary in a healthcare setting that requires rapid response to patient needs, interdepartmental coordination, and continuous growth plans. The fluidity of roles, shared authority, and collaborative decision-making exemplify an organic, rather than mechanistic, architecture.

Such a design promotes innovation, responsiveness, and personalized care, which are essential elements in a multidisciplinary healthcare setting serving a diverse community.

Importance of Differentiation, Integration, and Managing Complexity

Differentiation allows the various functions—clinical specialties, administrative support, hospital liaison—to develop specialized expertise, leading to higher efficiency and quality in patient care. However, excess differentiation can cause silos, reducing coordination. To counteract this, integration mechanisms—such as shared meetings, unified policies, and cross-disciplinary communication—are vital to ensure collaborative coherence and prevent fragmentation.

Managing complexity involves balancing multiple interconnected activities: outpatient care, hospital rounds, administrative tasks, and community outreach. The organization needs robust management systems to handle these interdependencies effectively. Interdependence is high among physicians, support staff, and hospital personnel; therefore, coordination becomes critical. Boundary-spanning activities—like the hospital liaison role—are essential to coordinate activities across organizational units and external hospital systems. These boundary-spanners foster communication, resolve conflicts, and align goals, enhancing overall organizational performance.

Organizational Chart and Departmentalization

The diagram would visualize a flat structure with three physicians at the top, each overseeing their specialty teams, with shared responsibilities for administrative functions, support staff, and hospital coordination functions. The office manager serves as a central point for administrative oversight; clinical staff (nurses, nurse practitioners) operate under the physicians' guidance; and the hospital liaison acts as an integrative node between the organization and external hospital entities.

The best-fit departmentalization for this organization is functional departmentalization, grouping activities into clinical services, administration/support, and hospital coordination. This structure supports specialization within functions, enhances communication within departments, and facilitates coordination among units through designated boundary-spanners like the hospital liaison.

Conclusion

This primary care organization, characterized by shared authority, interdisciplinary collaboration, and flexible design, aligns with an organic, decentralized structure. Effective differentiation and integration strategies are crucial to manage complexity and boundary activities. The strategic design enhances responsiveness and quality of healthcare delivery, essential for serving a diverse and dynamic community like Tampa.

References

• Daft, R. L. (2018). Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
• Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change. Pearson.
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structures in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
• Roberts, L. (2017). Managing Complexity in Healthcare Organizations. Healthcare Management Review, 42(4), 310–318.
• Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Sage Publications.
• Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing Organizations: An Executive Guide to Strategy, Structure, and Process. Jossey-Bass.
• Schmidt, H. (2019). Boundary-Spanning Roles in Healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Management, 64(2), 85–94.
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Prentice-Hall.
• Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (2000). The Demography of Organizations. Princeton University Press.
• Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization Development and Change. Cengage Learning.