Case Determining Training Needs At Summit Credit Union

Case Determining Training Needs At Summit Credit Unionsummit Credit U

Conducting a comprehensive needs assessment is essential for organizations like Summit Credit Union to ensure that employee training programs effectively develop the necessary skills and knowledge. In the context of Summit Credit Union, which has identified issues with new lenders starting their roles without adequate preparation, a systematic approach to assessing training needs is crucial. This process not only helps diagnose whether the problem stems from gaps in employee knowledge or from deficiencies in the current training curriculum but also guides the development of targeted interventions to enhance organizational performance and employee competence.

Introduction to the Case Study Problem

Summit Credit Union, riveted by growth and change following a major merger, emphasizes employee development through tailored training programs. Despite these efforts, the credit union has observed that newly hired lenders are often commencing their roles lacking the essential skills, information, and knowledge. This situation raises questions about the effectiveness of current training structures and the organization of the curriculum, which involves sequential courses on loan types, lending systems, guidelines, underwriting, and sales. The core problem is whether the existing training approach adequately prepares new lenders or if organizational issues hinder effective learning, necessitating a thorough needs assessment to identify specific gaps and root causes.

Conducting a Needs Assessment

The first step in the needs assessment process involves clarifying the purpose: to determine whether new lenders possess the requisite competencies to perform their roles effectively and to identify whether the current training curriculum is appropriately structured. A structured approach should include both qualitative and quantitative methods, such as interviews, surveys, direct observation, and performance data analysis. These methods help evaluate the actual competency levels of new lenders versus the skills and knowledge required for their roles.

One effective approach is a skills gap analysis, which compares the competencies of current new lenders with the standards set by the organization’s operational requirements. This can be complemented by conducting focus groups with trainers, managers, and experienced lenders to gather insights about the effectiveness of current training modules. Additionally, performance evaluations and customer feedback could help identify specific areas where new lenders struggle and confirm if deficiencies are due to the training curriculum or other organizational factors.

Moreover, a critical component involves reviewing the organization and sequence of training modules. Since the current curriculum separates learning about different loan types and systems from guidelines and sales skills into distinct courses, it’s necessary to analyze whether this sequencing impairs knowledge transfer or results in information gaps. A workshop or curriculum mapping exercise involving trainers and subject matter experts can pinpoint disconnects in training flow and content relevance.

Involving Stakeholders

Identifying and involving key stakeholders is vital for a comprehensive needs assessment. Stakeholders should include new lenders, experienced lenders, training and development staff, branch managers, HR personnel, and senior leadership. Each group provides unique perspectives on training effectiveness, information transfer, and performance challenges. Trainers and subject matter experts can offer insights into curriculum content and delivery issues, while managers and lenders can provide practical feedback on daily performance and knowledge gaps.

Engaging these stakeholders through interviews, surveys, and collaborative workshops ensures that the assessment captures diverse insights and fosters buy-in for subsequent training improvements. For example, managers can relay observations about lenders’ challenges during routine operations, which helps align training content with real-world demands. The inclusion of those directly involved with lending processes enhances the accuracy of the needs assessment and ensures that intervention strategies are grounded in organizational realities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a thorough needs assessment at Summit Credit Union should adopt an integrated approach combining data collection methods, stakeholder involvement, and curriculum analysis. This process will identify whether the current training gaps are due to insufficient content, poor sequencing, or other organizational issues. By engaging stakeholders at all levels and systematically analyzing performance and training effectiveness, Summit can adapt its learning initiatives to better prepare new lenders, ultimately supporting the credit union’s mission of improving members’ financial lives.

References

• Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee Training & Development (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Salopek, J. (2011). Investing in learning. T+D, 65(10), 56-58.
• Brown, P. C., & Green, T. D. (2017). Designing Effective Training Programs. Routledge.
• Miller, M. T., & Rice, J. K. (2019). Strategic training needs analysis: Unlocking organizational performance. Journal of Human Resources and Sustainability Development, 7(2), 67-85.
• Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Wadsworth Publishing.
• Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78-91.
• Hale, J., & Heavrin, C. (2004). The importance of needs assessments. Training & Development, 58(5), 28-33.
• Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jackson, J. (2012). The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101.
• Wexley, K. N., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Developing and Training Human Resources in Organizations. Prentice Hall.