Case Example: Emily Only Upon Repeated And Fervent Insistenc

Case Example Emilyonly Upon The Repeated And Fervent Insistence Of

Case Example - Emily* “Only upon the repeated and fervent insistence of her parents did 19-year-old Emily reluctantly agree to see a psychiatrist. “It’s not me you want to see,†Emily proclaimed emphatically. “It’s my insane parents who need your help.†Emily did not offer a chief complaint, aside from the concern that her parents were driving her “crazy.†She added, “Everything is going great in my life. I have plenty of friends, go out almost every night, and always have lots of fun.†While Emily was taking some time away from “the so-called real wired,†her sister was attending Duke University, her younger brother was excelling at a competitive private high school, and both her parents seemed to enjoy their careers as radiologists.

She asked, “Don’t you think that’s enough strivers for one family?†Emily agreed to have her parents join the session, and they told a different story. They tearfully disclosed that their daughter had become irritable, unproductive, and oppositional. She drank to intoxication almost every night, often not returning home for an entire weekend. In searching her room, they had found small amounts of marijuana, alprazolam (Xanax), cocaine, and prescription stimulants. The parents described the changes in Emily’s personality as “an adolescent nightmare†and described her friends as “losers who do nothing but dye their hair, get tattoos, and hate everything.†Emily’s attitudes and behavior contrasted markedly with those of her parents and siblings.

“We don’t mind that she is doing her own thing and that she isn’t conservative like the rest of us,†her father said, “but it’s like we don’t even recognize who she’s become.†According to her parents, Emily’s “adolescent nightmare†began 4 years earlier. She had apparently been a studious 15-year-old girl with a lively sense of humor and a wide circle of “terrific friends.†“Almost overnight,†she began to shun her longtime friends in favor of “dropouts and malcontents†and began to accumulate traffic tickets and school detentions. Instead of her former brightened curiosity, Emily manifested a lack of interest in all her academic subjects, and her grades dropped form As to Ds. The parents were at an absolute loss to explain the sudden and dramatic change.

The abrupt change in performance led the psychiatrist to ask Emily to take a battery of neuropsychological tests so the results could be compared with those of test she had taken when she had applied to a private high school several years earlier. In particular, Emily retook two high school admissions tests: the System for Assessment and Group Evaluation (SAGE), which measures a broad array of academic and perceptual aptitudes, and Differential Aptitude Tests (DAT), which focus on reasoning, spelling, and perceptual skills. On the SAGE, her average percentile scores dropped from the upper 10% for a 13 -year-old to the bottom 10% for an adult (and the bottom 20% for a 13-year-old). When Emily took the DAT at age 13, she scored in the highest range for ninth graders across almost all measures.

Her worst result had been in spelling, where she scored at the second-highest level. Upon repeating the test at age 19, she scored below the high school average in all measures. EEG, brain CT, and T2-weighted brain MRI images did not show evidence of structural brain damage, However, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) T2-weighted MRI displayed a clear lesion in the left frontal cortex, highly suggestive of previous injury to that region. Upon further questioning about the crucial period in which she seemed to have changed, Emily admitted to being in a traffic accident with her now ex-boyfriend, Mark. Although Emily did not recall much from this episode, she remembered that she hit her head and that she had bad headaches for many weeks thereafter.

Because Emily was not bleeding and there was no damage to the car, neither Mark nor Emily reported the incident to anyone. With Emily’s permission, the psychiatrist contacted Mark, who was away at college but a willing and excellent historian. He remembered the incident well. “Emily hit her head very, very hard on the dashboard of my car. She was not totally unconscious but very dazed. For almost 3 hours, she spoke very slowly, complained that her head hurt badly, and was confused. For about 2 hours she didn’t know where she was, what day it was, and when she had to get home. She also threw up twice. I was really scared, but Emily didn’t want me to worry her parents since they’re so overprotective And then she broke up with me, and we’ve hardly spoken since.†*

Sample Paper For Above instruction

This paper explores the complex case of Emily, a 19-year-old approximately, whose behavioral, cognitive, and neuropsychological changes suggest potential underlying neurological and psychological conditions. The case highlights the importance of comprehensive assessment, including neuroimaging and historical data, in understanding adolescent behavioral issues rooted in neurobiological injury. The analysis emphasizes the necessity of integrating clinical data to establish an accurate diagnosis and inform appropriate intervention strategies.

Introduction

The case of Emily presents a multifaceted scenario combining behavioral changes, neuropsychological decline, substance use, and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Her initial presentation of being a sociable, academically successful adolescent shifts toward oppositional and substance-using behaviors. Her parents' concerns and her own denial of any issues underline the potential for underlying neurological causes that are not immediately apparent. This report investigates the potential neurobiological and psychological factors underlying Emily’s presentation, with particular emphasis on the possible traumatic injury as indicated by imaging and her history of head trauma.

Behavioral and Psychological Manifestations

Emily’s sudden behavioral shift from a bright, academically motivated girl to one characterized by irritability, oppositional behaviors, and substance use is indicative of acute psychological distress or neurobiological impairment. Her increased consumption of alcohol and illicit substances suggests an attempt to self-medicate or cope with underlying distress or neurological dysfunction. The report observes her decline in academic performance, loss of interest in previous activities, and deteriorating social relationships, which are key signs of adolescent psychiatric disturbance. However, the discrepancy between her self-perception and her parents’ observations illustrates the complexity of adolescent behavioral issues, often involving denial or minimization of underlying problems.

Neuropsychological and Neuroimaging Findings

Neuropsychological testing revealed a significant decline in Emily’s academic abilities, with her scores dropping from high percentile rankings at age 13 to below average at age 19. These cognitive deficits, particularly in areas such as reasoning and spelling, suggest underlying disturbances in brain function. The neuroimaging studies further support this hypothesis, notably the FLAIR MRI revealing a lesion in the left frontal cortex. The frontal lobes are crucial for executive functions, impulse regulation, and social behavior. Damage to this region could explain many of Emily’s impulsivity, irritability, and behavioral disinhibition.

Trauma and Its Role in Emily’s Condition

The history of the head injury sustained during the traffic accident provides a critical clue. The incident involved a significant blow to the head, with symptoms including confusion, headache, vomiting, and prolonged dazed state. Such a traumatic event is capable of causing either structural or functional brain changes, especially involving the frontal lobes, which are susceptible to injury in vehicular accidents. Given the lesion in the left frontal cortex and her behavioral changes following the incident, the injury appears to be a central factor in her neuropsychological decline.

Discussion

Integrating clinical, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging data suggests that Emily’s behavioral changes are likely attributable to post-traumatic brain injury affecting the frontal lobes. This injury can impair executive functions, emotional regulation, and impulse control, leading to her oppositional and substance-using behaviors. Her substance use might be a maladaptive attempt to cope with or mask the neurological deficits. The decline in academic functioning and personality changes further support this hypothesis. It is essential to consider that adolescents are particularly vulnerable to neurodevelopmental disruptions following brain injury, which can manifest as behavioral and cognitive impairments.

Implications for Treatment

Effective management of Emily’s condition should focus on a multidisciplinary approach, including neurological rehabilitation, psychiatric intervention, and social support. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) can help her develop healthier coping strategies while addressing underlying emotional issues. Pharmacotherapy may be necessary to manage impulsivity and mood dysregulation linked to frontal lobe dysfunction. Close monitoring of neuropsychological progress and neuroimaging follow-up is critical for assessing recovery and adjusting treatments accordingly. Early intervention is essential for optimizing outcomes and helping Emily regain functional independence and emotional stability.

Conclusion

The case of Emily illustrates the profound impact traumatic brain injury can have on adolescent development and behavior. The integration of neuropsychological testing, neuroimaging, and clinical history points to the significance of brain injury in her behavioral syndrome. Addressing her complex needs calls for a holistic and interdisciplinary approach to treatment, aiming to rehabilitate cognitive deficits, support emotional health, and prevent further behavioral deterioration. The importance of early diagnosis and intervention cannot be overstated in mitigating long-term adverse outcomes associated with adolescent traumatic brain injury.

References

• Barnhill, J. (Ed.). (2014). DSM 5 Clinical Cases. American Psychiatric Publishing.
• Levine, B., & Cole, G. (2014). Traumatic brain injury and neurobehavioral complications. Journal of Neurotrauma, 31(4), 197–204.
• McAllister, T. W. (2018). Neurobiology of concussion. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 14(6), 761-769.
• Mahmood, F., & Lee, M. (2019). Neuroimaging in traumatic brain injury: Recent advances. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 102, 384–396.
• Kaspar, S. J., & Swisher, J. D. (2017). Cognitive rehabilitation after head injury. Neuropsychology Review, 27(2), 143–155.
• Satia, J. A., & Thompson, R. E. (2020). Behavioral management of adolescent TBI. Child Neuropsychology, 26(7), 979–998.
• Blake, J., & Hinkle, J. C. (2016). Pediatric traumatic brain injury. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 16(12), 86.
• Giza, C. C., & Kutcher, J. S. (2014). Summary of evidence-based guidelines for concussion management in youth. Pediatrics, 134(4), 799–806.
• McCrea, M., & Guskiewicz, K. (2018). Concussion biomechanics and neuropsychology. Clinical Sports Medicine, 37(3), 371–389.
• Huang, J., & Patel, A. (2021). Advances in neuroimaging for brain injury. NeuroImage: Clinical, 31, 102799.