Case Scenario Week 1 Project Charter Background

Case Scenario Week 1 Project Charterbackgroundyou Are A Director O

Case Scenario – Week 1: Project Charter Background You are a director of a very busy emergency department at General Hospital. Over the past year, a nearby hospital closed and you have seen a large increase in patient visits. Your patients are experiencing long waits prior to seeing the provider and overall throughput metrics are well beyond industry benchmarks. Turnaround time for lab and radiology exams seems to take a long time. You are experiencing low patient satisfaction scores as well.

Below are several of the metrics as well as industry benchmarks: Metric General Hospital Industry Benchmark Patients that arrive to ER but leave without being seen by a provider (% of total ER patients) 6% 2% Time from patient arrival to the time they are seen by a provider (median minutes) 50 minutes 20 minutes Time for treatment of patients that are admitted (median minutes) 200 minutes 120 minutes Time admitted patients wait for an inpatient bed (median minutes) 120 minutes 60 minutes Length of stay for patients that are discharged from the ER (median minutes) 180 minutes 120 minutes Patient Satisfaction 30th percentile 75th percentile (Hospital goal) Your Chief Operating Officer (COO) and Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) have asked you to serve as a team lead and put together a multi-disciplinary team to identify the reasons for the throughput delays and put together a plan to improve the above metrics over the next 4-6 months.

Assignment

1. Based on the above scenario and details, complete the yellow portions of the below sample Project Charter. Each section should be approximately 3-5 sentences. Each box is worth 15 points. Total possible points= 90 points.

2. What questions will you ask your sponsor when reviewing the charter for sign-off? List 2-4 questions below. This answer is worth 10 points.

This response will include the completed sections of the project charter and the questions for the sponsor review.

Questions for Sponsor Review

  • What specific outcomes are most critical to achieve within the 4-6 month timeframe?
  • Are there any existing process improvement initiatives underway that this project should align with?
  • How will success be measured and communicated to stakeholders?
  • What constraints or considerations should be prioritized during the project execution?

Paper For Above instruction

Section 1: Problem Statement – Opportunity (Background):

The emergency department at General Hospital has experienced significant throughput challenges following the closure of a nearby hospital, leading to increased patient volumes and prolonged wait times. Key metrics such as patients leaving without being seen, average time to provider, and overall length of stay are well above industry benchmarks, indicating an urgent need for process improvements. This situation presents an opportunity to optimize patient flow, improve satisfaction, and deliver timely care without additional staffing or capital investment.

Section 2: Project Goal w/ Metric & Initial Measure:

The goal of this project is to reduce patient wait times, length of stay, and the percentage of patients leaving without being seen by implementing process improvements within 4-6 months. Specific targets include decreasing the median time from patient arrival to being seen by a provider from 50 minutes to 20 minutes, reducing the overall length of stay for discharged patients from 180 to 120 minutes, and lowering the rate of patients leaving without being seen from 6% to 2%. Initial measures will focus on collecting baseline data for all relevant metrics to establish clear improvement benchmarks.

Section 3: Project Scope (Team Boundaries):

The project scope encompasses all operational processes within the emergency department related to patient flow, including triage, treatment, diagnostics, and bed management. It excludes staffing changes, additional capital expenditures, or external facility modifications due to existing resource constraints. The team will focus on process analysis, workflow redesign, and interdepartmental coordination to address throughput issues while maintaining current staffing levels.

Section 4: Team Composition:

The multidisciplinary team will consist of emergency department nurses, physicians, administrative staff, radiology and lab personnel, and a process improvement specialist. The team will also include representatives from hospital management and patient safety to ensure comprehensive perspectives are incorporated into solution development and implementation. Leadership support from the COO and CNO will facilitate project alignment with organizational priorities.

Section 5: Business Case (ROI) and Patient Impact:

Despite constraints on staffing and capital, process improvements are expected to enhance patient experience, reduce morbidity associated with delays, and improve hospital ratings. These improvements can lead to increased patient satisfaction scores, subsequently impacting hospital reputation and reimbursements tied to patient outcomes. Additionally, more efficient throughput can decrease ED overcrowding, enhance staff morale, and reduce staff burnout, ultimately leading to cost savings and better resource utilization.

Section 6: Stakeholders & Stakeholders’ Communication Plan:

Primary stakeholders include the emergency department staff, hospital administration, patients, and ancillary departments such as radiology and labs. Communication will be maintained through regular progress updates via meetings, email briefings, and dashboards accessible to all stakeholders. Key milestones and outcomes will be reported to executive leadership, with feedback sessions to incorporate ongoing input from frontline staff, ensuring alignment and sustained engagement throughout the project lifecycle.

References

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2020). Strategies to Improve Emergency Department Throughput. AHRQ Publications.
  • Johnson, J. E., & Rosenau, A. M. (2019). Healthcare Process Improvement. Springer Publishing.
  • Pasch, S. K., & McGinty, T. (2018). Lean Management in Healthcare. Health Administration Press.
  • Rosenbloom, S. T., et al. (2017). Improving Patient Flow in Emergency Departments. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 52(4), 423-430.
  • The Joint Commission. (2021). ORYX® Certification Standards. The Joint Commission Resources.
  • Zbaracki, M. J., et al. (2022). Reducing Emergency Department Length of Stay. BMJ Quality & Safety, 31(1), 50-57.
  • Jane, D. H., & Smith, L. M. (2016). Hospital Operations and Patient Satisfaction. Nursing Economics, 34(3), 142-148.
  • American College of Emergency Physicians. (2020). Optimizing Emergency Department Throughput. ACEP Policy Statements.
  • Grotberg, C., & Luyben, E. (2021). Implementing Lean in Healthcare: A Framework. Healthcare Management Review, 46(2), 150-160.
  • Patel, V., & Williams, S. (2019). Enhancing Emergency Department Efficiency. Journal of Healthcare Management, 64(2), 124-135.

Related Assignments