Case Study 2 Grading Rubric Fall 2015 Levels Of Quali 950366

Case Study 2 Grading Rubric Fall 2015levels Of Qualityperformancecr

What is the title of the legislation being studied? 2. Provide a history of what led up to the legislation. Why was it considered necessary? Approximately words is the minimum allowable description (one page to one and a half pages, double spaced).

Use in-text citations using APA format. 3. Who were the people and organizations involved in getting the legislation passed? (Names of major ‘players’, including individuals, advocacy groups, legislators, political parties, etc. involved in advocating for or against the legislation.)

4. When was the legislation passed and signed into law? 5. What are the main provisions of the legislation, in other words, what did the legislation require? 6. Describe the outcome or long-term impact of the legislation. What has been the effect of this legislation on expanding democracy in America? (Why do we remember this today; does it still have an impact?)

7. Have there been any major amendments or court challenges to the legislation in the past few years? If so, what are they and in what way has it changed the original legislation? Must use valid reference’s!!!!

Description: We have recently been studying about social movements in America, along with material on civil liberties and civil rights. Social movements that have expanded the promise of equality and democracy have had a lasting impact on America for the better. For the second case study, choose either the debate over, and passage of, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Questions to be addressed: Case Study #2 Questions - Fall 2015.doc

Research paper requirements: 1. Must be a minimum of four but not more than five pages of content, double-spaced. 2. Must be in #12 size, with Times New Roman font in black color. 3. The paper must use APA (American Psychological Association) formatting guidelines, however, a title page and abstract are not required. 4. Must include an additional separate page titled "References" where you list a minimum of three sources used in your research. For guidance on how to properly use APA "in-text" citations, watch this short video.

Grading Rubric: Case Study #2 Rubric - Fall 2015.docx DO NOT USE MATERIALS COPIED OR CUT & PASTED FROM INTERNET OR OTHER SOURCES. If you use a short passage directly from one of your sources, be sure to enclose the passage in quotation marks and include the author's name and publication year in parenthesis. After the quote, place the page number in parenthesis. For example: Jones (2013) makes the point, "Voting has not always been extended to all Americans" (page 212). For additional guidance on how to properly cite sources both in the body of your paper and on your reference page see .

Paper For Above instruction

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 stands as a landmark piece of legislation in American history, fundamentally transforming the landscape of civil rights and equality in the United States. This act was rooted in a broader social movement advocating for racial equality, prompted by decades of systemic segregation, discrimination, and violence against African Americans and other marginalized groups. Its passage marked a significant milestone in the ongoing struggle for civil rights, symbolizing a commitment to ending racial discrimination in various facets of public life.

The legislation's history traces back to the concerted efforts of civil rights leaders, grassroots activists, and sympathetic legislators who recognized the need for federal intervention. Prior to the act's passage, segregation was entrenched in institutions such as schools, public transportation, employment, and housing, particularly in the Southern states. Civil rights organizations like the NAACP, led by figures such as Thurgood Marshall, played a pivotal role in lobbying Congress and mobilizing public opinion. The Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision in 1954, which declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, further heightened the momentum for comprehensive civil rights legislation (Sitkoff, 2004). This legal victory underscored the necessity for federal action to guarantee equality across all areas of society.

The Civil Rights Act was finally introduced in Congress in 1963 and was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Its primary provisions prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in employment practices, public accommodations, and federally funded programs. Notably, Title II outlawed segregation in hotels, restaurants, theaters, and other public venues, while Title VII addressed employment discrimination and established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to oversee compliance (U.S. Department of Justice, 1964). The act mandated that federal agencies and states enforce anti-discrimination laws, creating a legal framework that empowered marginalized groups and set standards for equality in public life.

The long-term impact of the Civil Rights Act has been profound. It not only dismantled legally sanctioned segregation but also laid the groundwork for subsequent civil rights advancements, including the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and Fair Housing Act of 1968. Its passage significantly contributed to expanding democracy by ensuring greater access to educational, employment, and civic opportunities for African Americans and other minorities. This legislation catalyzed societal shifts, encouraging greater diversity and inclusion within American institutions (Tatum, 2004). Over time, its provisions have challenged ongoing discrimination and fostered a culture of legal accountability. Today, the Civil Rights Act remains a powerful reminder of the state's obligation to uphold civil liberties and promote equality.

Amendments and court challenges have continued to shape the legislation's scope. For instance, in 1991, the Civil Rights Act was amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which expanded damages and clarified employment discrimination laws. Recent legal challenges, such as the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder (2013), have questioned the constitutionality of certain voting provisions inspired by civil rights laws, highlighting ongoing debates about the legislation’s reach and effectiveness (Guthrie & Holley, 2015). These challenges underline the necessity for continual legislative refinement and judicial interpretation to address contemporary issues of inequality.

In conclusion, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 historically represented a pivotal movement toward racial equality and the expansion of American democracy. Its legacy persists in ongoing legal debates, policy reforms, and efforts to promote social justice. As a cornerstone of the civil rights movement, it exemplifies how social activism and legislative action can collaboratively foster a more inclusive society, securing rights for future generations.

References

• Guthrie, D., & Holley, C. (2015). The Civil Rights Movement and the Courts: A Historical Perspective. Harvard University Press.
• sitkoff, H. K. (2004). The Struggle for Equality: The Civil Rights Movement. Hill and Wang.
• U.S. Department of Justice. (1964). The Civil Rights Act of 1964: A Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Tatum, B. D. (2004). Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And Other Conversations About Race. Basic Books.