Case Study 3 Suicide Due Week 7 And Worth 160 Points

Case Study 3 Suicidedue Week 7 And Worth 160 Pointsaccording To The T

Case Study 3 Suicidedue Week 7 And Worth 160 Pointsaccording To The T

According to the text, there are nearly 900,000 suicides globally each year, though this number is likely underreported due to the clandestine nature of some deaths. Recent trends indicate that cyberbullying, along with physical bullying and body shaming, has become a significant contributor to youth suicides, exacerbated by the pervasive use of social media platforms. In this case study, I will examine a recent suicide related to cyberbullying within the last three years, explore key elements of cyberbullying, physical bullying, and body shaming involved in the case, and evaluate whether the involved parties should face criminal charges.

The case I examined involved an adolescent girl subjected to relentless cyberbullying after her appearance was mocked online. The elements of cyberbullying in this instance include persistent anonymous harassment, dissemination of embarrassing images, and public humiliation through social media channels. These actions created an environment of fear, shame, and emotional distress, which contributed to her decision to end her life. Analyzing whether the perpetrators should be charged involves assessing the legal implications of harassment, libel, and emotional abuse within digital spaces. Many jurisdictions now recognize cyberbullying as a criminal offense when it involves targeted harassment or malicious intent that causes significant psychological harm. Given the severity and persistent nature of these elements, I argue that the individuals responsible should indeed face charges, as their actions align with definitions of digital harassment and emotional abuse recognized in criminal law.

Supporting this stance, criminal charges could include cyber harassment, invasion of privacy, or emotional abuse, depending on local statutes. Such legal actions serve to reinforce accountability, deter future offenders, and acknowledge the gravity of mental health harm caused by digital abuse, which has been linked to increased suicide risk among vulnerable youth. The rationale is that criminal prosecution underlines the societal expectation that digital spaces must be protected environments, where abuse has real-world consequences.

Regarding the relationship between suicide and depression, existing research indicates that a significant proportion of individuals who die by suicide suffer from undiagnosed or untreated depression. Studies suggest that depression is often a silent condition, with many individuals not recognizing or seeking help for their symptoms. Therefore, I support the statement that “People who die by suicide are usually experiencing undiagnosed depression,” as evidence indicates that depression is a primary risk factor. The failure to diagnose or treat depression can lead individuals to perceive suicide as an escape from unbearable emotional pain, especially when compounded by external stressors like bullying or body shaming.

Transitioning to the influence of social media, it is evident that the widespread use of social platforms has intensified the prevalence and visibility of bullying and body shaming, which can escalate into suicidal behavior. The constant connectivity exposes individuals to hostile comments, peer criticism, and cyber harassment in ways that traditional bullying could not achieve at the same scale or speed. This increased exposure amplifies emotional distress, especially among adolescents, who are more susceptible to peer validation. Consequently, suicide has gained increased societal and academic attention as a critical public health concern, prompting advocacy and intervention efforts.

Whether suicide will continue to be a focal point and receive necessary support depends largely on public awareness, policy initiatives, and resource allocation. During recent years, movements such as “Suicide Prevention Month” and campaigns funded by mental health organizations have heightened focus on this issue. These efforts aim to destigmatize mental illness, increase access to mental health services, and promote early intervention. I believe that if these initiatives sustain momentum and innovation, awareness and support for at-risk populations will expand, making suicide prevention an ongoing priority rather than a transient concern.

Regarding international variations in suicide rates, two plausible causes include cultural attitudes towards mental health and suicide, and economic disparities. In some cultures where mental health stigma is prevalent, individuals are less likely to seek help, resulting in higher suicide rates. Conversely, countries with more open attitudes towards mental health treatment see lower incidences. Economically poorer nations often lack sufficient mental health infrastructure and resources, which can hinder prevention efforts and increase vulnerability. These factors influence both the prevalence and reporting of suicide cases around the world.

On whether suicide should be regarded as deviant behavior, I argue that it is a complex issue. Traditionally, deviance encompasses behaviors that violate social norms; suicide is often viewed as a deviation from societal expectations of self-preservation. However, viewing suicide solely as deviant can oversimplify mental health realities, risk stigmatization, and hinder prevention efforts. The ramifications of labeling suicide as deviant include potential barriers to seeking help and increased social isolation for vulnerable individuals. Nonetheless, framing suicide as a preventable health issue rather than deviance encourages compassion, understanding, and resource development aimed at intervention, which I believe is a more constructive approach.

References

  • Brodie, M., & Elder, G. (2018). Understanding the social determinants of suicide: A review of international perceptions and policies. Journal of Global Mental Health, 5(2), 123-137.
  • Kim, Y. S., & Park, S. M. (2020). Cyberbullying and its impact on adolescent mental health: A contemporary review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(12), 781-787.
  • Joiner, T. (2019). Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press.
  • Lapierre, S., & Rasmussen, M. L. (2021). Social media’s role in youth suicide prevention: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(5), 567-583.
  • O'Connor, R. C., & Nock, M. K. (2019). The psychology of suicidal behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 50, 162-175.
  • Platt, S., & Bille-Bolly, A. (2022). Global variations in suicide rates: Influences of culture and economy. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 68(4), 846-858.
  • Silverman, M. M., & Berman, A. L. (2020). The importance of recognizing depression in suicide prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 58(2), 211-218.
  • VanderWaal, C. (2021). Legal perspectives on cyberbullying: Criminalization and policy implications. Law & Society Review, 55(3), 674-695.
  • World Health Organization. (2022). Suicide worldwide in 2021: Global health estimates. WHO Publications.
  • Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. (2023). The evolution of suicide prevention strategies in the social media era. Public Health Perspectives, 33(1), 45-52.