Case Study: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patient Prof ✓ Solved

Case Study acute Respiratory Distress Syndromepatient Profilezq 84 Y

Interpret Z.Q.’s latest set of ABGs. Describe each of Z.Q.'s ventilator settings and the rationale for the selection of each. After reviewing Z.Q’s ABG results, the provider increases the PEEP from 5 cm H2O to 8cm H2O. Why would this be necessary and what is the expected outcome associated with this action? The provider decides to begin Z.Q. on IV dopamine and milrinone. What is the rationale for using each of these medications? Based on the assessment data, what are the nursing priorities for Z.Q.? List three potential adverse complications with mechanical ventilation. You are concerned about Z.Q.’s nutritional status and approach the provider for a dietary consult, thinking that Z.Q. is a candidate for enteral feedings with Pulmocare. What is your reason for making this recommendation?

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe, life-threatening condition characterized by widespread inflammation in the lungs, leading to impaired gas exchange and hypoxemia. In managing ARDS, understanding the latest arterial blood gas (ABG) analyses, ventilator strategies, pharmacologic interventions, and nutritional support are critical. This case study reviews the clinical management of an 84-year-old patient, Z.Q., with ARDS, focusing on interpretation of ABGs, ventilator parameters, medication rationale, nursing priorities, potential complications, and nutritional considerations.

Interpretation of Z.Q.'s Latest ABGs

Z.Q.'s recent ABG results reveal a pH of 7.31, PaCO2 of 58 mm Hg, HCO3 of 28 mmol/L, and PaO2 of 54 mm Hg. The pH indicates acidemia, and the elevated PaCO2 suggests hypoventilation or impaired CO2 elimination. The near-normal bicarbonate indicates a compensatory metabolic response. The low PaO2 reflects significant hypoxemia. This ABG profile signifies a primary respiratory acidosis with hypoxemia, typical of ARDS, where alveolar injury results in impaired oxygenation and ventilation (Gattinoni et al., 2017).

Ventilator Settings and Rationale

Z.Q. is being ventilated with a volume-cycled mode, set at a tidal volume of 450 mL, FIO2 of 60%, PEEP of 5 cm H2O, and rate of 14 breaths per minute. The tidal volume roughly corresponds to 6 mL/kg based on his weight (75 kg), aligning with lung-protective ventilation strategies recommended to minimize volutrauma (Ranieri et al., 2012). The FIO2 is set at 60% to optimize oxygenation while limiting oxygen toxicity. The PEEP of 5 cm H2O helps keep alveoli open and improve oxygenation; however, increasing PEEP aims to prevent alveolar collapse, improve oxygenation, and reduce shunt, which explains the later decision to elevate PEEP from 5 to 8 cm H2O. The respiratory rate of 14 prevents hypercapnia while avoiding excessive airway pressures (Fuller & O’Neill, 2017).

Rationale for Increasing PEEP

Increasing PEEP from 5 to 8 cm H2O enhances alveolar recruitment by preventing alveolar collapse during exhalation. In ARDS, alveoli are prone to collapse due to limited functional residual capacity and surfactant dysfunction. Elevating PEEP improves oxygenation by increasing the surface area for gas exchange and reducing intrapulmonary shunting (Fan et al., 2017). It is essential to balance the benefits of higher PEEP with the risk of barotrauma and decreased venous return. Expected outcomes include improved PaO2, reduced hypoxemia, and better overall oxygen delivery (Brower et al., 2017).

Pharmacologic Management: Dopamine and Milrinone

Dopamine acts as a dose-dependent adrenergic agent, primarily increasing cardiac output and blood pressure at moderate doses by stimulating beta-1 receptors. Milrinone is a phosphodiesterase inhibitor that enhances myocardial contractility and causes vasodilation. Initiating these medications aims to support cardiac function and improve perfusion, especially given Z.Q.'s weak peripheral pulses, signs of systemic vasodilation, and potential cardiopulmonary instability (Kline et al., 2015). This combination helps optimize hemodynamics, improve organ perfusion, and stabilize the critically ill patient.

Nursing Priorities

Key nursing priorities include maintaining adequate oxygenation and ventilation, preventing ventilator-associated complications, supporting hemodynamic stability, and ensuring patient safety. Continuous monitoring of ABGs, vital signs, and ventilator parameters guides therapy adjustments. Providing comfort, sedation, and communication support is essential, especially since Z.Q. intermittently attempts to pull out the ETT. Data suggests fluid management to prevent pulmonary edema and edema assessment of lower extremities is critical, given the presence of bilateral pitting edema. Infection control measures, skin integrity, and nutritional support further form integral components of his care plan (Kallet & Christman, 2016).

Potential Complications of Mechanical Ventilation

  1. Barotrauma and volutrauma caused by excessive airway pressures or large tidal volumes.
  2. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) stemming from bacterial colonization in the respiratory equipment.
  3. Hemodynamic instability due to high PEEP levels decreasing venous return and cardiac output.

Nutritional Assessment and Enteral Feeding with Pulmocare

Z.Q. is at risk of malnutrition due to the metabolic demands of critical illness, sedation, and limited oral intake. Initiating enteral nutrition with Pulmocare, a specialized formula designed for respiratory failure, supplies essential nutrients, preserves gut integrity, and minimizes infection risk associated with parenteral nutrition. Early enteral feeding improves immune function, reduces muscle wasting, and enhances recovery prospects, aligning with current ARDS nutritional protocols (Casaer & Van den Berghe, 2014). Therefore, recommending Pulmocare supports his nutritional status and overall clinical stability.

Conclusion

Effective management of ARDS involves thorough interpretation of ABGs, tailored ventilator settings, strategic pharmacologic interventions, vigilant nursing care, and nutritional support. In Z.Q.'s case, adjusting ventilator parameters to optimize oxygenation, understanding medication roles, and ensuring adequate nutrition are pivotal in improving outcomes. Continuous multidisciplinary collaboration and evidence-based practices remain the cornerstone of successful ARDS management, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities.

References

  • Brower, R. G., Matthay, M. A., Morris, A., Schoenfeld, D., Thompson, B. T., & Wheeler, A. (2017). Ventilation strategy for ARDS. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(24), 2191-2202.
  • Casaer, M. P., & Van den Berghe, G. (2014). Nutrition therapy in critical illness: An update. Clinical Nutrition, 33(6), 1164-1172.
  • Fan, E., Beitler, J. R., Brochard, L., et al. (2017). Ventilation management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. JAMA, 318(7), 623-634.
  • Fuller, B., & O’Neill, B. (2017). Mechanical ventilation strategies in ARDS: Practice and evidence. Critical Care Nurse, 37(3), 36-45.
  • Gattinoni, L., et al. (2017). Ventilator-induced lung injury: The role of PEEP and tidal volume. Intensive Care Medicine, 43(1), 33-44.
  • Kallet, R. H., & Christman, J. W. (2016). Mechanical ventilation in ARDS. Respiratory Care, 61(10), 1348-1365.
  • Kline, J. A., et al. (2015). Hemodynamic support in critical care: Pharmacologic agents. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 33(3), 405-410.
  • Ranieri, V. M., et al. (2012). ARDS Definition Task Force. Berlin definition for ARDS. JAMA, 307(23), 2526-2533.

Related Assignments