Case Study Continued Week Five You Have Been Performing In T ✓ Solved

Case Study Continued Week Fiveyou Have Been Performing In The Role O

Analyze and assess the impact of recent changes on a project, including scope, schedule, and budget considerations. Develop a change management process, draft a change request form, and discuss stakeholder communication strategies, all within the context of ongoing project performance and risk factors.

Paper For Above Instructions

In this paper, I will evaluate the recent updates and proposed changes to the existing project, including scope expansion, budget adjustments, and scheduling considerations. The analysis will be framed within the context provided by the original case study and the new developments introduced in the week five continuation. Emphasis will be placed on understanding how these changes influence project performance, risk management, stakeholder engagement, and overall project success.

Current Status of the Project

The project is currently progressing according to the established schedule, with all scheduled tasks being completed on time. Key indicators such as accurate month-end scheduling data and low team turnover suggest stability in staffing and task execution. The recent participant surveys reflect high satisfaction levels, indicating effective training delivery and positive stakeholder engagement. However, certain risk factors, notably the potential turnover of the top trainer, have evolved from high impact risk to current issue, which warrants close monitoring and contingency planning.

Leading indicators, such as schedule adherence and stakeholder satisfaction, suggest the project is on track, whereas lagging indicators, like budget consumption, reveal a forecasted overrun starting month five, with an excess of $10,000 per month. This discrepancy highlights potential cost management challenges that need addressing in the change process.

Impact of the Proposed Changes

The organization has decided to focus heavily on product development over the next three years and introduce an Agile training program centered on Scrum techniques. The scope of the original training program is to be extended to incorporate this Agile component. The initial approved budget does not fully cover the additional $20,000 estimated for Agile training, although Ms. Jackson is willing to allocate an extra $15,000. The addition of the Agile training, scheduled subsequent to the main program, introduces scope, schedule, and budget considerations.

Specifically, this change expands the scope of the current project, potentially impacting the timeline and resources. The budget adjustment is insufficient based on research, indicating a need for formal change management and funding approval processes. Additionally, the risk of trainer turnover may compromise the quality and delivery of the Agile training component, demanding proactive risk mitigation strategies.

Change Management Process

The change management process recommended involves a structured approach with defined approval and review steps. The process will begin with a change request submission, which will be reviewed by the project manager and the change control board (CCB). The CCB comprises key stakeholders, including project sponsors, team leads, and subject matter experts. An evaluation of impact on scope, schedule, and budget will follow, along with an assessment of risk and resource availability.

A flow chart illustrating the change process will be created, detailing steps from change request submission to final approval. The process will include a formal review, stakeholder consultation, and documentation, with the project manager ensuring alignment with project objectives. Final approval will be required from the project sponsor, Ms. Jackson, for scope and budget modifications. The process aims to ensure transparency, accountability, and effective communication.

Recommendations and Solutions

Given the projected budget overrun, scope expansion, and staffing risks, the following recommendations are proposed:

• Budget Adjustment: Officially request additional funding or reallocate existing resources to cover the $20,000 Agile training cost, recognizing the importance of this component to strategic objectives.
• Schedule Realignment: Adjust project timelines to accommodate the additional training, including contingency buffers for trainer recruitment or replacement if turnover occurs.
• Risk Mitigation: Develop a contingency plan for trainer turnover, such as cross-training existing staff or engaging multiple trainers, to mitigate impact on both the initial and Agile training modules.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Communicate transparently with stakeholders, including the project sponsor and team members, about the scope and implications of the changes, emphasizing their strategic importance and risk management.

These steps will help ensure the project remains aligned with organizational goals while managing risks related to scope, schedule, and cost.

Draft Change Request Form

The following is a draft change request form that can be submitted for approval:

In conclusion, addressing these proposed changes systematically through a robust change management process will help control project scope, schedule, and costs while fostering stakeholder confidence and project success.

References

• Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) — Sixth Edition. PMI.
• Kerzner, H. (2013). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government, and Our Community. Prosci.
• Levin, G. (2018). Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products. Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Sutton, R. I., & Rae, J. (2007). The Power of Positive Leadership. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Harvard Business Review. (2016). Leading Change? Why Resistance Is a Sign of Strength. HBR.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
• Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. Wiley.
• Gido, J., & Clements, J. (2018). Successful Project Management. Cengage Learning.