Case Study: Healing And Autonomy Mike And Joanne Are 952697 ✓ Solved

Case Study Healing And Autonomymike And Joanne Are The Parents Of Jam

Analyze the ethical decision-making process of Mike and Joanne regarding the treatment of their son James’s kidney failure, considering their religious beliefs and the principle of patient autonomy. Discuss how the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence apply to their decision to pursue faith healing over medical intervention, and evaluate the role of spiritual needs assessment in informing appropriate healthcare interventions for James and his family.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The intersection of faith, ethics, and medical treatment presents complex challenges, especially when familial and spiritual values influence critical healthcare decisions. The case of Mike and Joanne, parents of James suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, exemplifies these dilemmas. Their reluctance to pursue immediate medical intervention in favor of faith healing, driven by religious convictions and personal experiences, raises significant ethical questions about autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. Analyzing their decision-making process through these ethical principles, the importance of spiritual needs assessment, and the implications for healthcare providers offers valuable insights into culturally sensitive patient care.

Background of the Case

James, an eight-year-old boy, develops severe kidney failure secondary to a streptococcal infection. While typical treatment involves antibiotics and dialysis, Mike and Joanne choose to delay medical intervention, trusting in faith healing influenced by recent sermons and personal testimonies. Their decision results in James's condition worsening, necessitating urgent dialysis and eventually a kidney transplant. The potential donor, Samuel, James's brother, presents a viable tissue match, prompting the ethical dilemma of whether Samuel should undergo nephrectomy to save his brother or wait for divine intervention.

Decision-Making and Principle of Autonomy

A core ethical consideration in this scenario revolves around patient autonomy, extended to parental authority in pediatric cases. Respecting autonomy entails honoring the decision-making rights of individuals capable of informed consent; however, in pediatric care, parents generally act as surrogate decision-makers. The crux here lies in balancing parental religious beliefs and the child's best interests. Mike and Joanne’s choice to rely solely on faith healing reflects their autonomous religious convictions, yet their child's autonomy is limited by age and capacity to understand medical implications. The challenge is ensuring these beliefs do not infringe upon James’s right to beneficent and nonmaleficent care, highlighting the importance of healthcare providers gently navigating cultural sensitivities while advocating for necessary treatment.

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence in Medical Ethics

The principles of beneficence—acting in the patient's best interest—and nonmaleficence—avoiding harm—are integral to healthcare ethics. Delaying critical treatment, such as dialysis or transplant, jeopardizes James's health, violating beneficence by risking harm. Conversely, the parents' faith-based approach stems from their belief that divine power can cure or heal, which aligns with their personal understanding of beneficence within their religious framework. Nevertheless, ethically, deliberately postponing evidence-based interventions can cause preventable suffering and deterioration, conflicting with the physician’s obligation to do no harm. Healthcare providers must balance respecting spiritual beliefs with their duty to promote health and prevent harm, employing compassionate communication and evidence-based counseling.

The Role of Spiritual Needs Assessment

A spiritual needs assessment is a valuable tool in understanding the beliefs, values, and spiritual resources of patients and families, informing tailored interventions. In this case, conducting such an assessment could reveal the depth of Mike and Joanne’s faith, their hope for divine healing, and their fears associated with medical procedures. Recognizing these spiritual needs enables healthcare providers to incorporate spiritual support alongside medical treatment, fostering trust and shared decision-making. Addressing spiritual needs may involve involving chaplains, providing spiritual counseling, or facilitating faith-based discussions that respect beliefs while emphasizing the importance of medical interventions. This holistic approach can reconcile spiritual convictions with necessary healthcare actions, ensuring ethically sound and culturally sensitive care.

Implications for Healthcare Practice

Healthcare professionals must navigate complex ethical terrains when cultural and religious beliefs influence medical decisions. Engaging families respectfully, providing clear information, and offering spiritual support are essential strategies. In cases like James’s, integrating spiritual assessments into routine care can aid in understanding families' precise needs and concerns, thereby guiding ethically appropriate care plans. Moreover, fostering open dialogue encourages shared decision-making, aligning treatment with both medical necessity and spiritual values.

Conclusion

The case of Mike and Joanne highlights the ethical complexities inherent in balancing religious beliefs with medical responsibilities. Respecting patient and family autonomy involves honoring spiritual convictions while safeguarding health and well-being through beneficence and nonmaleficence. Spiritual needs assessments serve as vital tools for healthcare providers to deliver culturally competent, compassionate care. Ultimately, bridging faith and medicine requires sensitivity, communication, and a commitment to holistic patient-centered care that respects diverse values and promotes optimal health outcomes.

References

• Beale, D., & Cunningham, P. (2016). Ethics in Children's Healthcare. Journal of Pediatric Ethics, 10(2), 113-122.
• Browning, C. L., & Raue, P. J. (2019). Spirituality and health: The role of spiritual assessments. Journal of Religion and Health, 58(4), 1235-1248.
• Johnstone, M. J., & Kanitsaki, O. (2006). Ethics and cultural competence in health care: A review of the literature. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 17(3), 272-282.
• Koh, K. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2018). Parental decision-making in pediatric healthcare: Ethical dilemmas. International Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(1), 23-28.
• Levin, R. F. (2014). The ethical case for physician-assisted death. NEJM, 371(20), 1887-1888.
• Napier, A., & Anson, J. (2013). Religious beliefs and medical decision-making. British Medical Journal, 346, f3008.
• Park, M., & Gaffney, K. (2020). Integrating spiritual care into medical practice: A review. Journal of Spirituality & Health, 22(2), 251-262.
• Sulmasy, D. P. (2014). Spirituality, religion, and health: Primitive, complex, or controversial? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29(2), 162-168.
• Ulrich, C. M., & Daniel, M. (2018). Culturally competent care: A guide for health professionals. Nursing Clinics of North America, 53(2), 251-268.
• Wilkinson, S., & Bennett, A. (2019). Family decision-making in pediatric health care: Ethical principles and practical considerations. Pediatrics & Child Health, 24(4), 283-288.